Goldberg E
Medical College of Pennsylvania/Eastern Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute, Philadelphia 19129.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1990 Aug;12(4):467-84. doi: 10.1080/01688639008400994.
Associative agnosias are traditionally regarded as perceptual, and ideational apraxia as motor, deficits, but they can be understood as amnesias for generic knowledge, caused by bilateral or unilateral left-hemispheric cortical lesions. Current theories of hemispheric specialization explain these syndromes' mandatory link with left-hemispheric damage, and are validated by this link. This link reflects the multiple nature of generic, categorical representational systems, not all reducible to natural language, and the left hemisphere's principal role as their substrate, regardless of their dependence on language. The distinction between processing novel information, and processing based on well-established, routinized representations, captures a fundamental difference between the functions of the right and left hemispheres. The complementary link of apperceptive agnosias with right-and associative agnosias with left-hemisphere lesions is an expression of this general principle in the posterior cortex. Future studies of the neuroanatomy of agnosias in animals may offer insights into the evolutionary continuities of hemispheric specialization.
联想性失认症传统上被视为感知缺陷,观念性失用症被视为运动缺陷,但它们可被理解为由双侧或单侧左半球皮质病变导致的一般知识失忆症。当前关于半球特化的理论解释了这些综合征与左半球损伤的必然联系,并通过这种联系得到验证。这种联系反映了一般范畴表征系统的多重性质,并非所有都可简化为自然语言,以及左半球作为其基础的主要作用,无论它们对语言的依赖程度如何。处理新信息与基于既定的、常规化表征进行处理之间的区别,体现了右半球和左半球功能的根本差异。统觉性失认症与右半球病变以及联想性失认症与左半球病变的互补联系,是这一普遍原则在后皮质的一种体现。未来对动物失认症神经解剖学的研究可能会为半球特化的进化连续性提供见解。