• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Calibration of FRAX ® 3.1 to the Dutch population with data on the epidemiology of hip fractures.FRAX ® 3.1 对荷兰髋部骨折流行病学数据的校准。
Osteoporos Int. 2012 Mar;23(3):861-9. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1852-2. Epub 2011 Nov 26.
2
Incidence of hip fracture in Romania and the development of a Romanian FRAX model.罗马尼亚的髋部骨折发生率和罗马尼亚 FRAX 模型的建立。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2013 May;92(5):429-36. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9697-7. Epub 2013 Jan 19.
3
Incidence of hip fracture in Brazil and the development of a FRAX model.巴西髋部骨折的发生率和 FRAX 模型的建立。
Arch Osteoporos. 2015;10:224. doi: 10.1007/s11657-015-0224-5. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
4
Fracture prediction and calibration of a Canadian FRAX® tool: a population-based report from CaMos.加拿大 FRAX®工具的骨折预测和校准:来自 CaMos 的基于人群的报告。
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Mar;22(3):829-37. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1465-1. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
5
Incidence of hip fracture in Barranquilla, Colombia, and the development of a Colombian FRAX model.哥伦比亚巴兰基亚的髋部骨折发生率和哥伦比亚 FRAX 模型的建立。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2013 Jul;93(1):15-22. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9717-7. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
6
The Epidemiology of Hip and Major Osteoporotic Fractures in a Dutch Population of Community-Dwelling Elderly: Implications for the Dutch FRAX® Algorithm.荷兰社区居住老年人髋部和主要骨质疏松性骨折的流行病学:对荷兰FRAX®算法的启示
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 3;10(12):e0143800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143800. eCollection 2015.
7
Performance of FRAX in a cohort of community-dwelling, ambulatory older men: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study.FRAX 在社区居住、活动能力正常的老年男性队列中的表现:男性骨质疏松性骨折研究(MrOS)。
Osteoporos Int. 2013 Apr;24(4):1185-93. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2215-3. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
8
Construction of a FRAX® model for the assessment of fracture probability in Canada and implications for treatment.构建加拿大骨折风险评估 FRAX®模型及其对治疗的影响。
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Mar;22(3):817-27. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1464-2. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
9
Development and application of FRAX in the management of osteoporosis in Ireland.FRAX 在爱尔兰骨质疏松症管理中的开发与应用。
Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8:146. doi: 10.1007/s11657-013-0146-z. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
10
Assessing the risk of osteoporotic fractures: the Ecuadorian FRAX model.评估骨质疏松性骨折风险:厄瓜多尔 FRAX 模型。
Arch Osteoporos. 2019 Aug 22;14(1):93. doi: 10.1007/s11657-019-0644-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of CT-Based Finite Element Modeling for Osteoporosis Screening in Secondary Fracture Prevention: An Early Health Technology Assessment in the Netherlands.基于CT的有限元模型在继发性骨折预防中骨质疏松症筛查的成本效益分析:荷兰的一项早期卫生技术评估
MDM Policy Pract. 2023 Oct 26;8(2):23814683231202993. doi: 10.1177/23814683231202993. eCollection 2023 Jul-Dec.
2
Romosozumab efficacy and safety in European patients enrolled in the FRAME trial.FRAME 试验中纳入的欧洲患者的 Romosozumab 疗效和安全性。
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Dec;33(12):2527-2536. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06544-2. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
3
Bone material strength index as measured by in vivo impact microindentation is normal in subjects with high-energy trauma fractures.体内冲击微钻测量的骨材料强度指数在高能创伤骨折患者中正常。
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Jul;33(7):1511-1519. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06368-0. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
4
Bone Material Strength Index as Measured by Impact Microindentation is Low in Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism.通过冲击微压痕测量的骨材料强度指数在原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进患者中较低。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Jun 16;106(7):e2527-e2534. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab207.
5
Homogeneity in prediction of survival probabilities for subcategories of hipprosthesis data: the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association, 2000-2013.髋关节假体数据亚类生存概率预测的同质性:北欧关节置换登记协会,2000 - 2013年
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 10;11:519-524. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S199227. eCollection 2019.
6
A brief history of FRAX.FRAX 的简史。
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Oct 31;13(1):118. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0510-0.
7
Frequency and Associated Factors of Bone Fractures in Russians: The Ural Eye and Medical Study.俄罗斯人群骨折的发生频率及相关因素:乌拉尔眼科与医学研究。
Sci Rep. 2018 May 10;8(1):7483. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25928-1.
8
Bone material strength index as measured by impact microindentation is low in patients with fractures irrespective of fracture site.骨材料强度指数由冲击微压痕测量,无论骨折部位如何,骨折患者的该指数均较低。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Aug;28(8):2433-2437. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4054-8. Epub 2017 May 2.
9
Rationale of the Spanish FRAX model in decision-making for predicting osteoporotic fractures: an update of FRIDEX cohort of Spanish women.西班牙FRAX模型在预测骨质疏松性骨折决策中的原理:西班牙女性FRIDEX队列的更新
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jun 17;17:262. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1096-6.
10
High prevalence of secondary factors for bone fragility in patients with a recent fracture independently of BMD.近期骨折患者中,与骨密度无关的骨脆性继发因素的高患病率。
Arch Osteoporos. 2016;11(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s11657-016-0258-3. Epub 2016 Feb 23.

本文引用的文献

1
FRAX(®) with and without bone mineral density.FRAX(®) 联合或不联合骨密度。
Calcif Tissue Int. 2012 Jan;90(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s00223-011-9544-7. Epub 2011 Nov 6.
2
Official Positions for FRAX(®) clinical regarding glucocorticoids: the impact of the use of glucocorticoids on the estimate by FRAX(®) of the 10 year risk of fracture from Joint Official Positions Development Conference of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX(®).FRAX(®)临床关于糖皮质激素的官方立场:糖皮质激素的使用对 FRAX(®)评估 10 年骨折风险的影响——国际临床骨密度学会和国际骨质疏松基金会关于 FRAX(®)的联合官方立场发展会议。
J Clin Densitom. 2011 Jul-Sep;14(3):212-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.05.014.
3
Joint Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX(®). Executive Summary of the 2010 Position Development Conference on Interpretation and use of FRAX® in clinical practice.国际临床密度测定学会和国际骨质疏松基金会关于 FRAX(®)的联合官方立场。2010 年 FRAX®临床实践解释和应用立场发展会议执行摘要。
J Clin Densitom. 2011 Jul-Sep;14(3):171-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.05.007.
4
Interpretation and use of FRAX in clinical practice.FRAX 在临床实践中的解读和应用。
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Sep;22(9):2395-411. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1713-z. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
5
Secular trends in the incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures.髋部和其他骨质疏松性骨折发病率的长期变化趋势。
Osteoporos Int. 2011 May;22(5):1277-88. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1601-6. Epub 2011 Apr 2.
6
Hip fractures in a city in Northern Norway over 15 years: time trends, seasonal variation and mortality : the Harstad Injury Prevention Study.挪威北部一城市 15 年以上的髋部骨折:时间趋势、季节性变化和死亡率:哈斯塔德伤害预防研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Oct;22(10):2603-10. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1485-x. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
7
Guidance for the adjustment of FRAX according to the dose of glucocorticoids.根据糖皮质激素剂量调整 FRAX 的指南。
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Mar;22(3):809-16. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1524-7. Epub 2011 Jan 13.
8
Fracture prediction and calibration of a Canadian FRAX® tool: a population-based report from CaMos.加拿大 FRAX®工具的骨折预测和校准:来自 CaMos 的基于人群的报告。
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Mar;22(3):829-37. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1465-1. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
9
Dopaminergic drugs and the risk of hip or femur fracture: a population-based case-control study.多巴胺能药物与髋部或股骨骨折风险:基于人群的病例对照研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Jul;22(7):2197-204. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1455-3. Epub 2010 Oct 22.
10
Development of a simple prognostic nomogram for individualising 5-year and 10-year absolute risks of fracture: a population-based prospective study among postmenopausal women.制定一个简单的预后列线图,以个体化绝经后妇女 5 年和 10 年骨折绝对风险:一项基于人群的前瞻性研究。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jan;70(1):92-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.131813. Epub 2010 Sep 27.

FRAX ® 3.1 对荷兰髋部骨折流行病学数据的校准。

Calibration of FRAX ® 3.1 to the Dutch population with data on the epidemiology of hip fractures.

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Osteoporos Int. 2012 Mar;23(3):861-9. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1852-2. Epub 2011 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1007/s00198-011-1852-2
PMID:22120910
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3277691/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The FRAX tool has been calibrated to the entire Dutch population, using nationwide (hip) fracture incidence rates and mortality statistics from the Netherlands. Data used for the Dutch model are described in this paper.

INTRODUCTION

Risk communication and decision making about whether or not to treat with anti-osteoporotic drugs with the use of T-scores are often unclear for patients. The recently developed FRAX models use easily obtainable clinical risk factors to estimate an individual's 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture that is useful for risk communication and subsequent decision making in clinical practice. As of July 1, 2010, the tool has been calibrated to the total Dutch population. This paper describes the data used to develop the current Dutch FRAX model and illustrates its features compared to other countries.

METHODS

Age- and sex-stratified hip fracture incidence rates (LMR database) and mortality rates (Dutch national mortality statistics) for 2004 and 2005 were extracted from Dutch nationwide databases (patients aged 50+ years). For other major fractures, Dutch incidence rates were imputed, using Swedish ratios for hip to osteoporotic fracture (upper arm, wrist, hip, and clinically symptomatic vertebral) probabilities (age- and gender-stratified). The FRAX tool takes into account age, sex, body mass index (BMI), presence of clinical risk factors, and bone mineral density (BMD).

RESULTS

Fracture incidence rates increased with increasing age: for hip fracture, incidence rates were lowest among Dutch patients aged 50-54 years (per 10,000 inhabitants: 2.3 for men, 2.1 for women) and highest among the oldest subjects (95-99 years; 169 of 10,000 for men, 267 of 10,000 for women). Ten-year probability of hip or major osteoporotic fracture was increased in patients with a clinical risk factor, lower BMI, female gender, a higher age, and a decreased BMD T-score. Parental hip fracture accounted for the greatest increase in 10-year fracture probability.

CONCLUSION

The Dutch FRAX tool is the first fracture prediction model that has been calibrated to the total Dutch population, using nationwide incidence rates for hip fracture and mortality rates. It is based on the original FRAX methodology, which has been externally validated in several independent cohorts. Despite some limitations, the strengths make the Dutch FRAX tool a good candidate for implementation into clinical practice.

摘要

未标注

FRAX 工具已针对荷兰全国范围内(髋部)骨折发生率和死亡率统计数据进行校准,以适用于全体荷兰人群。本文介绍了用于荷兰模型的数据。

简介

使用 T 评分进行风险沟通和是否使用抗骨质疏松药物治疗的决策,对患者来说往往不明确。最近开发的 FRAX 模型使用容易获得的临床危险因素来估计个体 10 年内发生主要骨质疏松性骨折和髋部骨折的概率,这对于风险沟通和随后的临床实践决策很有用。截至 2010 年 7 月 1 日,该工具已针对全体荷兰人群进行校准。本文介绍了用于开发当前荷兰 FRAX 模型的数据,并说明了与其他国家相比的特点。

方法

从荷兰全国范围内的数据库(年龄≥50 岁的患者)中提取了 2004 年和 2005 年按年龄和性别分层的髋部骨折发生率(LMR 数据库)和死亡率(荷兰国家死亡率统计数据)。对于其他主要骨折,使用瑞典的髋部骨折与骨质疏松性骨折(上臂、腕部、髋部和有症状的椎体)概率比(按年龄和性别分层)对荷兰的发生率进行了推断。FRAX 工具考虑了年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、临床危险因素的存在情况和骨密度(BMD)。

结果

骨折发生率随年龄增长而增加:对于髋部骨折,荷兰患者中年龄 50-54 岁的发生率最低(每 10,000 名居民:男性 2.3 例,女性 2.1 例),年龄最大的患者(95-99 岁)的发生率最高(男性 169 例/10,000,女性 267 例/10,000)。存在临床危险因素、BMI 较低、女性、年龄较大和 BMD T 评分较低的患者,发生髋部或主要骨质疏松性骨折的 10 年概率增加。父母髋部骨折对 10 年骨折概率的影响最大。

结论

荷兰 FRAX 工具是第一个针对全体荷兰人群进行校准的骨折预测模型,使用了全国范围内的髋部骨折发生率和死亡率。它基于原始的 FRAX 方法学,该方法学已在几个独立的队列中得到外部验证。尽管存在一些局限性,但该模型的优势使其成为临床实践中实施的一个很好的候选方案。