Malgo F, Appelman-Dijkstra N M, Termaat M F, van der Heide H J L, Schipper I B, Rabelink T J, Hamdy N A T
Center for Bone Quality and Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9600, 2300, RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Center for Bone Quality and Department of Traumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Arch Osteoporos. 2016;11(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s11657-016-0258-3. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
In this study, we demonstrate a high prevalence of secondary factors in patients with a recent fracture independently of bone mineral density (BMD). Our results suggest that patients with a recent fracture should be screened for secondary factors for bone fragility regardless of BMD values.
Secondary factors for bone fragility are common in patients with osteoporosis who have sustained a fracture. The majority of fragility fractures occurs, however, in patients with osteopenia, and it is not known whether secondary factors may contribute to fracture risk in these patients or in those with normal BMD.
Prospective cohort study evaluating the prevalence of secondary factors for bone fragility in consecutive patients referred to our fracture liaison service from June 2012 to June 2014 after a recent fracture.
Seven hundred nine patients were included, 201 (28 %) with osteoporosis, 391 (55 %) with osteopenia and 117 (17 %) with normal BMD. Mean age was 66.0 ± 9.8 years, 504 (73 %) were women and 390 (57 %) had one or more underlying secondary factor. Evaluation of clinical risk factors using fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) identified 38 % of patients with ≥1 secondary factor including smoking (18 %), excessive alcohol use (12 %), glucocorticoid use (12 %) and rheumatoid arthritis (3 %). Laboratory investigations revealed chronic kidney disease in 13 %, monoclonal gammopathy also in 13 % and primary or secondary hyperparathyroidism in 1 and 6 %, respectively. Secondary factors for bone fragility were equally prevalent in patients with osteoporosis, osteopenia or normal BMD.
Our findings demonstrate a high prevalence of secondary factors for bone fragility in patients who have sustained a recent fracture, independently of BMD. The significant number of documented factors, which were treatable, suggest that patients who sustained a fracture should be screened for secondary factors for bone fragility regardless of BMD values to optimise secondary fracture prevention.
在本研究中,我们证明近期骨折患者中,与骨矿物质密度(BMD)无关的继发性因素普遍存在。我们的结果表明,无论BMD值如何,近期骨折患者均应筛查骨脆性的继发性因素。
骨脆性的继发性因素在发生骨折的骨质疏松症患者中很常见。然而,大多数脆性骨折发生在骨量减少的患者中,目前尚不清楚继发性因素是否会增加这些患者或骨密度正常患者的骨折风险。
前瞻性队列研究,评估2012年6月至2014年6月期间因近期骨折转诊至我们骨折联络服务中心的连续患者中骨脆性继发性因素的患病率。
共纳入709例患者,其中骨质疏松症患者201例(28%),骨量减少患者391例(55%),骨密度正常患者117例(17%)。平均年龄为66.0±9.8岁,504例(73%)为女性,390例(57%)有一个或多个潜在的继发性因素。使用骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)评估临床风险因素,发现38%的患者有≥1个继发性因素,包括吸烟(18%)、过量饮酒(12%)、使用糖皮质激素(12%)和类风湿性关节炎(3%)。实验室检查显示,13%的患者患有慢性肾脏病,13%的患者患有单克隆丙种球蛋白病,原发性或继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进分别为1%和6%。骨脆性继发性因素在骨质疏松症、骨量减少或骨密度正常的患者中同样普遍。
我们的研究结果表明,近期骨折患者中,与BMD无关的骨脆性继发性因素普遍存在。大量可治疗的记录因素表明,无论BMD值如何,骨折患者均应筛查骨脆性继发性因素,以优化继发性骨折预防。