Labelle L, Laurence J R, Nadon R, Perry C
Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
J Abnorm Psychol. 1990 Aug;99(3):222-8. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.99.3.222.
We sought to extend the finding (Laurence & Perry, 1983) that it is possible through hypnosis to create a pseudomemory of a specific event. Subjects were compared on their responses to a hypnotic suggestion. We also examined the relation between nonhypnotic measures (Preference for an Imagic Cognitive Style [PICS] test and the Tellegen Absorption Scale [TAS]) and response to the suggestion. Highly (45.45%) and moderately-highly (46.15%) susceptible subjects believed that the pseudomemory was veridical, but none of the low susceptible subjects did so. Together, hypnotic susceptibility, the PICS, and their interaction more strongly predicted pseudomemory creation than any of these main effects alone. Performance on the TAS was also related to the occurrence of pseudomemory, but this relation was redundant with performance on the other measures. These results point to the complexity of the variables involved in pseudomemory creation during hypnosis.
我们试图扩展一项研究发现（劳伦斯和佩里，1983年），即通过催眠有可能创造出特定事件的伪记忆。研究人员比较了受试者对催眠暗示的反应。我们还研究了非催眠测量方法（意象认知风格偏好[PICS]测试和泰勒根吸收量表[TAS]）与对暗示的反应之间的关系。高度易受催眠影响（45.45%）和中度高度易受催眠影响（46.15%）的受试者认为伪记忆是真实的，但低易受催眠影响的受试者中没有人这样认为。总体而言，与单独的任何一个主要效应相比，催眠易感性、PICS及其相互作用更能有力地预测伪记忆的产生。TAS的表现也与伪记忆的出现有关，但这种关系与其他测量方法的表现是冗余的。这些结果表明，催眠过程中伪记忆产生所涉及的变量具有复杂性。
