Lynn S J, Rhue J W, Myers B P, Weekes J R
Psychology Department, Ohio University, Athens 45701.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1994 Apr;42(2):118-29. doi: 10.1080/00207149408409345.
High hypnotizable (n = 23) and low hypnotizable simulating (n = 13) subjects received pseudomemory suggestions. High hypnotizable and low hypnotizable simulating subjects were equally likely to pass the target noise suggestion during hypnosis and were also equally likely (high hypnotizables, 47.83%; low hypnotizable simulators, 64.29%) to report pseudomemories when tested for pseudomemory after instructions to awaken. As in previous research with task-motivated subjects, pseudomemory rate (high hypnotizables, 47.48%; low hypnotizable simulators, 46.15%) was not reduced by informing subjects that they could distinguish fantasy and reality in a nonhypnotic state of deep concentration. At final inquiry, after deep concentration, high hypnotizable and low hypnotizable simulating subjects' pseudomemories remained comparable (43.48% and 38.46%, respectively). Unlike previous research, high hypnotizable subjects did not report more unsuggested noises and more pseudomemories of novel sounds than did awake low hypnotizable simulating subjects. Pseudomemory reports were generally consistent with subjects' ratings of whether the hypnotist expected them to believe the sounds were real or imagined.
高催眠易感性组（n = 23）和低催眠易感性模拟组（n = 13）的受试者接受了虚假记忆暗示。高催眠易感性组和低催眠易感性模拟组的受试者在催眠过程中通过目标噪音暗示的可能性相同，并且在接到唤醒指令后进行虚假记忆测试时报告虚假记忆的可能性也相同（高催眠易感性组为47.83%；低催眠易感性模拟组为64.29%）。与之前针对任务驱动型受试者的研究一样，告知受试者他们可以在非催眠的深度专注状态下区分幻想和现实，并不会降低虚假记忆发生率（高催眠易感性组为47.48%；低催眠易感性模拟组为46.15%）。在深度专注后的最终询问中，高催眠易感性组和低催眠易感性模拟组受试者的虚假记忆仍然相当（分别为43.48%和38.46%）。与之前的研究不同，高催眠易感性组受试者并未比清醒的低催眠易感性模拟组受试者报告更多未被暗示的噪音和更多新声音的虚假记忆。虚假记忆报告总体上与受试者对催眠师是否期望他们相信声音是真实的还是想象的评分一致。
