• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 ACQ 和 ACT 与 GINA 标准对当前哮喘控制进行前瞻性评估。

Prospective evaluation of current asthma control using ACQ and ACT compared with GINA criteria.

机构信息

Pulmonary Department, Mainz University Hospital, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011 Dec;107(6):474-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.anai.2011.09.001
PMID:22123375
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The goal of asthma treatment is to achieve and maintain current best control and reduce future risk of exacerbations and long-term morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

To prospectively compare current asthma control as defined by ACQ (asthma control questionnaire) and ACT (asthma control test) criteria with the GINA (Global Initiative for Asthma) classification in treated patients in a real-life setting.

METHODS

In 150 adult patients (48% male, age 46.3 ± 14.4 years., forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV(1)], 2.3 ± 0.9 L or 78.5 ± 21.8% pred.), asthma control was evaluated using the GINA classification as the "true" and ACQ-7, ACQ-5, and ACT as "predictor" criteria. The relationship between GINA-defined uncontrolled vs controlled/partly controlled asthma and ACQ and ACT scores was assessed with the ACQ cutpoint of ≥ 1.50 and the ACT cut-point of ≤ 19 for uncontrolled asthma.

RESULTS

The ACQ-7 and ACT correctly predicted GINA-defined uncontrolled asthma in 71.3% and 80.7% of patients, respectively. Sensitivity was high, with 88% for ACQ-7 and 94% for ACT, specificity was 57% and 70%, positive predictive value was 63% and 72%, and negative predictive value was 86% and 93%. Similar results were obtained using ACQ-5. ACQ-7 and ACT classified significantly more patients as having uncontrolled asthma compared with the GINA criteria (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

ACQ scores ≥ 1.50 and ACT scores ≤ 19 are suitable to indicate uncontrolled asthma. To identify GINA-defined uncontrolled asthma, cutoff points for ACQ-5 should be ≥ 1.9 and for ACT ≤ 16, at least in real-life adult patients with mostly moderate and severe asthma.

摘要

背景

哮喘治疗的目标是实现并维持当前最佳控制水平,降低未来加重和长期发病的风险。

目的

前瞻性比较 ACQ(哮喘控制问卷)和 ACT(哮喘控制测试)标准定义的当前哮喘控制与 GINA(全球哮喘倡议)分类在真实环境中治疗患者的情况。

方法

在 150 名成年患者(48%为男性,年龄 46.3 ± 14.4 岁,用力呼气量 1 秒 [FEV1],2.3 ± 0.9 L 或 78.5 ± 21.8%预测值)中,使用 GINA 分类作为“真实”标准,ACQ-7、ACQ-5 和 ACT 作为“预测”标准评估哮喘控制情况。使用 ACQ 切点≥1.50 和 ACT 切点≤19 评估 GINA 定义的未控制与控制/部分控制哮喘与 ACQ 和 ACT 评分之间的关系。

结果

ACQ-7 和 ACT 分别正确预测了 71.3%和 80.7%患者的 GINA 定义的未控制哮喘。敏感性高,ACQ-7 为 88%,ACT 为 94%,特异性为 57%和 70%,阳性预测值为 63%和 72%,阴性预测值为 86%和 93%。使用 ACQ-5 也得到了类似的结果。与 GINA 标准相比,ACQ-7 和 ACT 分类显著将更多患者归类为未控制哮喘(P<0.001)。

结论

ACQ 评分≥1.50 和 ACT 评分≤19 适合表明未控制哮喘。要确定 GINA 定义的未控制哮喘,ACQ-5 的截止值应为≥1.9,ACT 的截止值应为≤16,至少在现实生活中患有中重度哮喘的成年患者中是这样。

相似文献

1
Prospective evaluation of current asthma control using ACQ and ACT compared with GINA criteria.使用 ACQ 和 ACT 与 GINA 标准对当前哮喘控制进行前瞻性评估。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011 Dec;107(6):474-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
2
[Comparison of the Asthma Control Test (ACT) with lung function, levels of exhaled nitric oxide and control according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA)].[哮喘控制测试(ACT)与肺功能、呼出气一氧化氮水平以及根据全球哮喘防治创议(GINA)的控制情况的比较]
Arch Bronconeumol. 2010 Jul;46(7):370-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2010.04.003.
3
Measuring asthma control: a comparison of three classification systems.哮喘控制的评估:三种分类系统的比较。
Eur Respir J. 2010 Aug;36(2):269-76. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00124009. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
4
Can the Asthma Control Questionnaire be used to differentiate between patients with controlled and uncontrolled asthma symptoms? A pilot study.哮喘控制问卷能否用于区分哮喘症状得到控制和未得到控制的患者?一项初步研究。
Fam Pract. 2006 Dec;23(6):674-81. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cml041. Epub 2006 Jul 31.
5
Cut-off points for defining asthma control in three versions of the Asthma Control Questionnaire.哮喘控制问卷三个版本中用于定义哮喘控制的切点。
J Asthma. 2010 Oct;47(8):865-70. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2010.491149.
6
Evaluation of the asthma control test: a reliable determinant of disease stability and a predictor of future exacerbations.哮喘控制测试评估:疾病稳定性的可靠决定因素,也是未来加重的预测指标。
Respirology. 2012 Feb;17(2):370-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.02105.x.
7
Discrepancy between clinical asthma control assessment tools and fractional exhaled nitric oxide.临床哮喘控制评估工具与呼出一氧化氮分数之间的差异。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Aug;101(2):124-9. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60199-8.
8
A psychometric comparison of three patient-based measures of asthma control.三种基于患者的哮喘控制测量方法的心理测量学比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Feb;23(2):369-77. doi: 10.1185/030079906X167426.
9
Asthma control measurement using five different questionnaires: a prospective study.采用五种不同问卷评估哮喘控制:一项前瞻性研究。
Respir Med. 2013 Sep;107(9):1314-21. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
10
Association between asthma control and bronchial hyperresponsiveness and airways inflammation: a cross-sectional study in daily practice.哮喘控制与支气管高反应性和气道炎症的关系:日常实践中的横断面研究。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2009 Dec;39(12):1822-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03332.x. Epub 2009 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Nurses' Role in the Control and Treatment of Asthma in Adults: A Systematic Literature Review.护士在成人哮喘控制和治疗中的作用:系统文献回顾。
Adv Respir Med. 2024 Apr 25;92(3):175-189. doi: 10.3390/arm92030019.
2
Association between pre-biologic T2-biomarker combinations and response to biologics in patients with severe asthma.严重哮喘患者中 T2 生物标志物组合与生物制剂应答之间的关联。
Front Immunol. 2024 Apr 19;15:1361891. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1361891. eCollection 2024.
3
Exploring Definitions and Predictors of Severe Asthma Clinical Remission after Biologic Treatment in Adults.
探索成人接受生物治疗后重度哮喘临床缓解的定义和预测因素。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Oct 1;210(7):869-880. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202311-2192OC.
4
A Predictive Machine Learning Tool for Asthma Exacerbations: Results from a 12-Week, Open-Label Study Using an Electronic Multi-Dose Dry Powder Inhaler with Integrated Sensors.一种用于哮喘急性加重的预测性机器学习工具:使用带有集成传感器的电子多剂量干粉吸入器进行的为期12周的开放标签研究结果。
J Asthma Allergy. 2022 Nov 11;15:1623-1637. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S377631. eCollection 2022.
5
Cigarette smoke aggravates asthma by inducing memory-like type 3 innate lymphoid cells.香烟烟雾通过诱导记忆样 3 型先天淋巴细胞加重哮喘。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jul 4;13(1):3852. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31491-1.
6
Misperception of poor asthma control in the outpatients clinic of a tertiary hospital in Rio de Janeiro.里约热内卢一家三级医院门诊中对哮喘控制不佳的误判
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2022 Jan 5;19:eAO6259. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2021AO6259. eCollection 2022.
7
Feasibility and acceptability of monitoring personal air pollution exposure with sensors for asthma self-management.使用传感器监测个人空气污染暴露以进行哮喘自我管理的可行性和可接受性。
Asthma Res Pract. 2021 Sep 5;7(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40733-021-00079-9.
8
Real-World Multicenter Experience with Mepolizumab and Benralizumab in the Treatment of Uncontrolled Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Over 12 Months.美泊利珠单抗和贝那利珠单抗治疗12个月以上未控制的重度嗜酸性粒细胞性哮喘的真实世界多中心经验
J Asthma Allergy. 2021 Jul 12;14:863-871. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S319572. eCollection 2021.
9
Depressive Symptoms and Overperception of Airflow Obstruction in Older Adults With Asthma.老年人哮喘患者的抑郁症状与气流阻塞过度感知。
Psychosom Med. 2021 Sep 1;83(7):787-794. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000951.
10
Effect of nocturnal Temperature-controlled Laminar Airflow on the reduction of severe exacerbations in patients with severe allergic asthma: a meta-analysis.夜间温控层流空气对重度过敏性哮喘患者严重病情加重减少的影响:一项荟萃分析
Eur Clin Respir J. 2021 Mar 10;8(1):1894658. doi: 10.1080/20018525.2021.1894658.