Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, United Kingdom.
Anesthesiology. 2012 Jan;116(1):182-5. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823d7784.
Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. By J. Martin Bland, Douglas G. Altman. Lancet 1986; 1(8476):307-10. Abstract reprinted with permission of Elsevier, copyright 1986. In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often needed to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old. Such investigations are often analyzed inappropriately, notably by using correlation coefficients. The use of correlation is misleading. An alternative approach, based on graphical techniques and simple calculations, is described, together with the relation between this analysis and the assessment of repeatability.
评价两种临床测量方法间一致性的统计学方法。作者:J. 马丁·布兰德,道格拉斯 G. 阿特曼。柳叶刀 1986;1(8476):307-10. 摘要经 Elsevier 许可重印,版权所有 1986。在临床测量中,通常需要比较新的测量技术与已建立的技术,以观察它们是否足够一致,以便用新方法替代旧方法。此类研究通常分析不当,特别是使用相关系数。相关系数的使用具有误导性。本文介绍了一种基于图形技术和简单计算的替代方法,并讨论了该分析与可重复性评估之间的关系。