Suppr超能文献

一致的统计数据:测量方法比较。

Agreed statistics: measurement method comparison.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 2012 Jan;116(1):182-5. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823d7784.

Abstract

Statistical Methods for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Clinical Measurement. By J. Martin Bland, Douglas G. Altman. Lancet 1986; 1(8476):307-10. Abstract reprinted with permission of Elsevier, copyright 1986. In clinical measurement comparison of a new measurement technique with an established one is often needed to see whether they agree sufficiently for the new to replace the old. Such investigations are often analyzed inappropriately, notably by using correlation coefficients. The use of correlation is misleading. An alternative approach, based on graphical techniques and simple calculations, is described, together with the relation between this analysis and the assessment of repeatability.

摘要

评价两种临床测量方法间一致性的统计学方法。作者:J. 马丁·布兰德,道格拉斯 G. 阿特曼。柳叶刀 1986;1(8476):307-10. 摘要经 Elsevier 许可重印,版权所有 1986。在临床测量中,通常需要比较新的测量技术与已建立的技术,以观察它们是否足够一致,以便用新方法替代旧方法。此类研究通常分析不当,特别是使用相关系数。相关系数的使用具有误导性。本文介绍了一种基于图形技术和简单计算的替代方法,并讨论了该分析与可重复性评估之间的关系。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验