• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Multiple rubric-based assessments of student case presentations.基于多种评分标准对学生病例展示进行评估。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Jun 15;72(3):58. doi: 10.5688/aj720358.
2
Peer- and self-grading compared to faculty grading.同伴评价和自我评估与教师评价的比较。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Sep 10;75(7):130. doi: 10.5688/ajpe757130.
3
Assessment of the validity of peer scores and peer feedback in an online peer assessment platform (Kritik).在线同伴评估平台(Kritik)中同伴评分和同伴反馈的有效性评估。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2023 Apr;15(4):400-407. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2023.04.004. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
4
A mentor-based portfolio program to evaluate pharmacy students' self-assessment skills.基于导师的作品集计划评估药学学生的自我评估技能。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 May 13;77(4):81. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77481.
5
A workshop series using peer-grading to build drug information, writing, critical-thinking, and constructive feedback skills.一个使用同伴互评来培养药物信息、写作、批判性思维和建设性反馈技能的系列研讨会。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Dec 15;78(10):191. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7810191.
6
The development of a rubric for peer assessment of individual teamwork skills in undergraduate midwifery students.制定一个用于评估本科助产学生个体团队合作技能的同侪评估表。
Women Birth. 2014 Sep;27(3):220-6. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
7
Inter-Rater Reliability of Web-Based Calibrated Peer Review within a Pharmacy Curriculum.基于网络的药学课程中经过校准的同伴互评的评分者间信度。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Apr;84(4):7583. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7583.
8
[Rubric Assessment for Pharmacotherapy in Spiral Curriculum: Development and Usefulness Evaluation].[螺旋式课程中药物治疗的评分评估:开发与实用性评价]
Yakugaku Zasshi. 2020;140(12):1441-1454. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.20-00029.
9
A progress assessment to evaluate pharmacy students' knowledge prior to beginning advanced pharmacy practice experiences.一项用于在开始高级药学实践经验之前评估药学专业学生知识的进展评估。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Aug 15;72(4):88. doi: 10.5688/aj720488.
10
Improvement of student confidence and competence through a self-care skills multi-course integration.通过自我护理技能多课程整合提高学生的信心和能力。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020 Apr;12(4):378-387. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2019.12.022. Epub 2019 Dec 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiential Education in Pharmacy Curriculum: The Lebanese International University Model.药学课程中的体验式教育:黎巴嫩国际大学模式
Pharmacy (Basel). 2020 Dec 29;9(1):5. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9010005.
2
Implementation of Oral Case Presentations in an Immunology Course.免疫学课程中口头病例报告的实施
Mo Med. 2018 Jan-Feb;115(1):66-70.
3
Reliability of rubrics in the assessment of orthodontic oral presentation.正畸口腔展示评估中评分标准的可靠性
Saudi Dent J. 2017 Oct;29(4):135-139. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
4
Practical Team-Based Learning from Planning to Implementation.基于团队的实践学习:从规划到实施
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Dec 25;79(10):149. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7910149.
5
Assessment of a Revised Method for Evaluating Peer-graded Assignments in a Skills-based Course Sequence.评估基于技能的课程序列中同伴评分作业的修订评估方法。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2015 Oct 25;79(8):123. doi: 10.5688/ajpe798123.
6
An elective course on application of clinical pharmacy principles.临床药学原理应用选修课程。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Dec 16;77(10):216. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7710216.
7
Communications training in pharmacy education, 1995-2010.药学教育中的沟通培训,1995-2010 年。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Mar 12;77(2):36. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77236.
8
Rubric evaluation of pediatric emergency medicine fellows.儿科急诊医学住院医师的分项评估
J Grad Med Educ. 2010 Dec;2(4):523-9. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-10-00083.1.
9
The development of a competency-based assessment rubric to measure resident milestones.用于衡量住院医师里程碑的基于能力的评估量表的开发。
J Grad Med Educ. 2009 Sep;1(1):45-8. doi: 10.4300/01.01.0008.
10
Peer- and self-grading compared to faculty grading.同伴评价和自我评估与教师评价的比较。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Sep 10;75(7):130. doi: 10.5688/ajpe757130.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing Medical Student Professionalism: An Analysis of a Peer Assessment.评估医学生的职业素养:一项同行评估分析
Med Educ Online. 2006 Dec;11(1):4587. doi: 10.3402/meo.v11i.4587.
2
An analysis of peer, self, and tutor assessment in problem-based learning tutorials.基于问题的学习辅导中同伴、自我和导师评估的分析。
Med Teach. 2007 Jun;29(5):e122-32. doi: 10.1080/01421590701294323.
3
Development of an instrument to assess individual student performance in small group tutorials.
J Nurs Educ. 2004 Oct;43(10):447-55. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20041001-01.
4
A quantitative assessment of a medicinal chemistry problem-based learning sequence.基于问题的药物化学学习序列的定量评估。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2006 Aug 15;70(4):89. doi: 10.5688/aj700489.
5
Self-assessment in pharmacy education.药学教育中的自我评估。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2006 Jun 15;70(3):64. doi: 10.5688/aj700364.
6
Peer assessment in problem-based learning: a qualitative study.基于问题的学习中的同伴评估:一项定性研究。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007 May;12(2):169-86. doi: 10.1007/s10459-005-5046-6. Epub 2006 Oct 28.
7
A simple instrument for the assessment of student performance in problem-based learning tutorials.一种用于评估基于问题的学习辅导中学生表现的简易工具。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2006 Sep;35(9):634-41.
8
An online evaluation of problem-based learning (PBL) in Chung Shan Medical University, Taiwan - a pilot study.台湾中山医学大学基于问题式学习(PBL)的在线评估——一项试点研究。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2006 Sep;35(9):624-33.
9
Not knowing that they do not know: self-assessment accuracy of third-year medical students.医科三年级学生对自身知识欠缺的不自知:自我评估的准确性
Med Educ. 2006 Feb;40(2):173-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02372.x.
10
Students' and assessors' attitudes towards students' self-assessment of their personal and professional behaviours.学生和评估者对学生个人及职业行为自我评估的态度。
Med Educ. 2005 Jan;39(1):30-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02030.x.

基于多种评分标准对学生病例展示进行评估。

Multiple rubric-based assessments of student case presentations.

作者信息

O'Brien Catherine E, Franks Amy M, Stowe Cindy D

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 West Markham Street, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Jun 15;72(3):58. doi: 10.5688/aj720358.

DOI:10.5688/aj720358
PMID:18698367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2508736/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate a rubric-based method of assessing pharmacy students' case presentations in the recitation component of a therapeutics course.

METHODS

A rubric was developed to assess knowledge, skills, and professional behavior. The rubric was used for instructor, student peer, and student self-assessment of case presentations. Rubric-based composite scores were compared to the previous dichotomous checklist-based scores.

RESULTS

Rubric-based instructor scores were significantly lower and had a broader score distribution than those resulting from the checklist method. Spring 2007 rubric-based composite scores from instructors and peers were significantly lower than those from the pilot study results, but self-assessment composite scores were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful development and implementation of a grading rubric facilitated evaluation of knowledge, skills, and professional behavior from the viewpoints of instructor, peer, and self in a didactic course.

摘要

目的

评估一种基于评分标准的方法,用于在治疗学课程的背诵环节评估药学专业学生的病例展示。

方法

制定了一个评分标准来评估知识、技能和专业行为。该评分标准用于教师、学生同伴和学生自我对病例展示的评估。将基于评分标准的综合分数与之前基于二分法清单的分数进行比较。

结果

基于评分标准的教师评分显著低于基于清单法的评分,且分数分布更广泛。2007年春季教师和同伴基于评分标准的综合分数显著低于试点研究结果,但自我评估综合分数没有显著差异。

结论

成功开发和实施评分标准有助于从教学课程中教师、同伴和自我的角度评估知识、技能和专业行为。