Department Public Health, University of Otago, PO Box 7343, Wellington South, Wellington 6021, New Zealand.
Tob Control. 2013 Mar;22(2):130-5. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050119. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
The objective is to (a) refine and use methods to measure the point prevalence of smoking and of secondhand smoke exposure in moving vehicles and (b) compare these prevalences (1) between two areas of contrasting socioeconomic status and (2) over time.
The authors developed and tested a single-observer method and observed the point prevalence of smoking in vehicles in Wellington, New Zealand. The two observation sites represented high and low areas of socioeconomic deprivation (based on a small area deprivation index).
A total of 149 886 vehicles were observed. The mean point prevalence of smoking in vehicles at both sites combined was 3.2% (95% CI 3.1% to 3.3%). Of those vehicles with smoking, 4.1% had children present. Smoking point prevalence in vehicles was 3.9 times higher in the area of high deprivation than in the area of low deprivation (95% CI 3.6 to 4.2). The same pattern was seen for vehicles with only the driver at 3.6 times (95% CI 3.4 to 4.0), in vehicles with other adults at 4.0 times (95% CI 3.4 to 4.7) and in vehicles with children at 10.9 times (95% CI 6.8 to 21.3), with all results adjusted for vehicle occupancy.
Observing smoking in vehicles using a single-observer method provides a feasible and objective indicator of the different smoking behaviours, especially around children, within an area. This study further supports the evidence from this country and internationally that adults and children from high-deprivation areas are much more likely to be exposed to secondhand smoke.
(a)改进并使用方法来测量移动车辆中吸烟和二手烟暴露的时点患病率,(b)比较这两种患病率(1)在两个社会经济地位差异较大的地区之间,(2)随时间的变化情况。
作者开发并测试了一种单观察者方法,并观察了新西兰惠灵顿车辆中吸烟的时点患病率。两个观察点代表了社会经济贫困程度较高和较低的地区(基于小面积贫困指数)。
共观察了 149886 辆车。两个观察点的车辆吸烟的平均时点患病率均为 3.2%(95%置信区间 3.1%至 3.3%)。在有吸烟的车辆中,有 4.1%有儿童在场。高贫困地区车辆吸烟的时点患病率比低贫困地区高 3.9 倍(95%置信区间 3.6 至 4.2)。在只有司机的车辆中,这一比例为 3.6 倍(95%置信区间 3.4 至 4.0),在有其他成年人的车辆中为 4.0 倍(95%置信区间 3.4 至 4.7),在有儿童的车辆中为 10.9 倍(95%置信区间 6.8 至 21.3),所有结果均根据车辆占用情况进行了调整。
使用单观察者方法观察车辆中的吸烟情况,为评估一个地区内不同的吸烟行为,特别是与儿童有关的吸烟行为,提供了一种可行和客观的指标。本研究进一步支持了来自该国家和国际上的证据,即来自高贫困地区的成年人和儿童更有可能接触到二手烟。