Department of Zoology and Ecology, University of Navarra, Calle Irunlarrea 1 31008, Pamplona (Navarra), Spain.
J Fish Biol. 2011 Dec;79(6):1563-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2011.03073.x. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
To detect differences in the information available on freshwater fish species found in Mexican biosphere reserves, the number of species considered in three sources of information: management programmes, Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and the scientific literature were compared. Additionally, management actions for the reserves were evaluated. More than 55% of freshwater fish species registered for the reserves were found only in one of the three sources of information, while just 12% was shared among all the three. Fifteen threatened species were registered in GBIF and the scientific literature that were not found in management programmes. Although all the management programmes described conservation actions, none of them gave details about how they would be implemented. Lack of communication among the sources studied, unawareness of the existence of threatened species and the absence of detailed management actions hinder the development of adequate conservation strategies.
为了检测在墨西哥生物圈保护区中发现的淡水鱼类物种的信息差异，比较了三种信息来源（管理计划、全球生物多样性信息设施（GBIF）和科学文献）中考虑的物种数量。此外，还评估了保护区的管理措施。在登记的保护区淡水鱼类物种中，有超过 55%的物种仅在三种信息来源中的一种中找到，而只有 12%的物种在所有三种来源中共享。在 GBIF 和科学文献中登记了 15 种受威胁物种，但在管理计划中没有发现。虽然所有的管理计划都描述了保护措施，但没有一个计划详细说明了如何实施这些措施。研究中来源之间缺乏沟通、对受威胁物种的存在缺乏认识以及缺乏详细的管理措施，都阻碍了制定适当的保护策略的发展。
