Trovato M J, Scholer A J, Vallejo E, Buncke G M, Granick M S
Eplasty. 2011;11:e48. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
Early studies of plastic surgery patient triage using telemedicine are descriptive and deal with feasibility rather than accuracy. The inpatient study arm compares on-site wound-evaluation accuracy with remotely viewed digital images. The outpatient arm prospectively compares on-site and remote diagnosis, management, and outcomes in a busy, urban, reconstructive-surgery clinic. The concurrent 6 patient case studies illustrate significant systems improvement by using remote consultation.
A total of 43 inpatients and 100 consecutive outpatients were evaluated by on-site and remote surgeons as performed in previous arms with digital-camera and store and forward technology. Consent was obtained from all patients participating. Agreements regarding diagnosis (skin lesion, hand injury, wound type, and scar character) and management (healing problem, emergent evaluation, antibiotics, and hospitalization) were calculated.
In the first study arm, on-site and remote agreement (46%-86% for wound description and 65%-81% for management) generally matched agreement among on-site surgeons (68%-100% and 84%-89%). Moreover, when on-site agreement was low (68% for edema), agreement between on-site and remote surgeons was also low (57%). Remote evaluation was least sensitive detecting wound drainage (46%). On-site surgeons opted for more treatment, often prescribing antibiotics and admitting the patient. The second teleconsult arm provides further evidence of accuracy, overall agreement of 32%, sensitivity 48.55%, specificity 96.92%, positive predictive value 49.26%, negative predictive value 96.83%, and P < .001 regarding diagnosis (skin lesion, hand injury, wound type, wound problem, and scar character). Patient transfer, postoperative monitoring, and outcomes via electronic image transfer, as well as cost-benefit analysis of this clinic-based study, are presented.
eConsultation renders similar outcomes to standard, on-site examination in a selected group of plastic surgery patients. Remote evaluation may assist triage decisions, thereby decreasing emergency room throughput time and office-visit frequency, supplementing satellite facility consultation by plastic surgeons, and providing real-time postoperative assessments, thereby improving quality and reducing costs.
早期关于利用远程医疗对整形手术患者进行分诊的研究多为描述性研究,主要探讨可行性而非准确性。住院患者研究组比较现场伤口评估与远程查看数字图像的准确性。门诊患者研究组前瞻性地比较了在一家繁忙的城市整形手术诊所中现场诊断、管理及结果与远程诊断、管理及结果。同时进行的6例患者案例研究表明,使用远程会诊可显著改善系统。
共有43例住院患者和100例连续的门诊患者接受了现场和远程外科医生的评估,评估方式与之前研究组相同,采用数码相机及存储转发技术。所有参与患者均已获得同意。计算了关于诊断(皮肤病变、手部损伤、伤口类型及瘢痕特征)和管理(愈合问题、紧急评估、抗生素及住院治疗)的一致性。
在首个研究组中,现场与远程评估的一致性(伤口描述方面为46%-86%,管理方面为65%-81%)总体上与现场外科医生之间的一致性(68%-100%和84%-89%)相符。此外,当现场评估一致性较低时(水肿方面为68%),现场与远程外科医生之间的一致性也较低(57%)。远程评估在检测伤口引流方面最不敏感(46%)。现场外科医生选择了更多的治疗方式,经常开具抗生素并收治患者。第二个远程会诊研究组进一步证明了准确性,总体一致性为32%,敏感性为48.55%,特异性为96.92%,阳性预测值为49.26%,阴性预测值为96.83%,关于诊断(皮肤病变、手部损伤、伤口类型、伤口问题及瘢痕特征)P <.001。还介绍了通过电子图像传输实现的患者转诊、术后监测及结果,以及这项基于诊所研究的成本效益分析。
在特定的整形手术患者群体中,电子会诊与标准的现场检查效果相似。远程评估可协助分诊决策,从而减少急诊室周转时间和门诊就诊频率,补充整形外科医生对卫星机构的会诊,并提供实时术后评估,进而提高质量并降低成本。