Suppr超能文献

考虑研究内相关性的病例对照研究Meta分析的贝叶斯分析

Bayesian analysis on meta-analysis of case-control studies accounting for within-study correlation.

作者信息

Chen Yong, Chu Haitao, Luo Sheng, Nie Lei, Chen Sining

机构信息

Division of Biostatistics, The University of Texas Health Science Centre at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Stat Methods Med Res. 2015 Dec;24(6):836-55. doi: 10.1177/0962280211430889. Epub 2011 Dec 4.

Abstract

In retrospective studies, odds ratio is often used as the measure of association. Under independent beta prior assumption, the exact posterior distribution of odds ratio given a single 2 × 2 table has been derived in the literature. However, independence between risks within the same study may be an oversimplified assumption because cases and controls in the same study are likely to share some common factors and thus to be correlated. Furthermore, in a meta-analysis of case-control studies, investigators usually have multiple 2 × 2 tables. In this article, we first extend the published results on a single 2 × 2 table to allow within study prior correlation while retaining the advantage of closed-form posterior formula, and then extend the results to multiple 2 × 2 tables and regression setting. The hyperparameters, including within study correlation, are estimated via an empirical Bayes approach. The overall odds ratio and the exact posterior distribution of the study-specific odds ratio are inferred based on the estimated hyperparameters. We conduct simulation studies to verify our exact posterior distribution formulas and investigate the finite sample properties of the inference for the overall odds ratio. The results are illustrated through a twin study for genetic heritability and a meta-analysis for the association between the N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) acetylation status and colorectal cancer.

摘要

在回顾性研究中,比值比常被用作关联度的衡量指标。在独立贝塔先验假设下,文献中已推导得出给定单个2×2列联表时比值比的精确后验分布。然而,同一研究中风险之间的独立性可能是一个过于简化的假设,因为同一研究中的病例和对照可能共享一些共同因素,从而存在相关性。此外,在病例对照研究的荟萃分析中,研究者通常有多个2×2列联表。在本文中,我们首先将已发表的关于单个2×2列联表的结果进行扩展,以允许研究内先验相关性,同时保留封闭形式后验公式的优势,然后将结果扩展到多个2×2列联表和回归设置。通过经验贝叶斯方法估计包括研究内相关性在内的超参数。基于估计的超参数推断总体比值比和研究特异性比值比的精确后验分布。我们进行模拟研究以验证我们的精确后验分布公式,并研究总体比值比推断的有限样本性质。通过一项关于遗传遗传性的双胞胎研究和一项关于N-乙酰转移酶2(NAT2)乙酰化状态与结直肠癌关联的荟萃分析来说明结果。

相似文献

1
Bayesian analysis on meta-analysis of case-control studies accounting for within-study correlation.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2015 Dec;24(6):836-55. doi: 10.1177/0962280211430889. Epub 2011 Dec 4.
2
Meta-analysis of studies with bivariate binary outcomes: a marginal beta-binomial model approach.
Stat Med. 2016 Jan 15;35(1):21-40. doi: 10.1002/sim.6620. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
3
mmeta: An R Package for Multivariate Meta-Analysis.
J Stat Softw. 2014 Jan 1;56(11):11.
5
An Empirical Bayes Method for Multivariate Meta-analysis with an Application in Clinical Trials.
Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2014 Jul 29;43(16):3536-3551. doi: 10.1080/03610926.2012.700379.
6
Association Between N-acetyltransferase 2 Polymorphism and Bladder Cancer Risk: Results From Studies of the Past Decade and a Meta-Analysis.
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016 Apr;14(2):122-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
7
N-acetyltransferase 2 status and gastric cancer risk: a meta-analysis.
Tumour Biol. 2014 Jul;35(7):6861-5. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-1847-7. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
9
Pooling controls from different studies.
Stat Med. 1991 Sep;10(9):1417-26. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780100909.

引用本文的文献

1
Accounting for publication bias using a bivariate trim and fill meta-analysis procedure.
Stat Med. 2022 Aug 15;41(18):3466-3478. doi: 10.1002/sim.9428. Epub 2022 May 16.
4
A Bayesian approach for correcting exposure misclassification in meta-analysis.
Stat Med. 2019 Jan 15;38(1):115-130. doi: 10.1002/sim.7969. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
5
Practical guide to the meta-analysis of rare events.
Evid Based Ment Health. 2018 May;21(2):72-76. doi: 10.1136/eb-2018-102911. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
6
A model for meta-analysis of correlated binary outcomes: The case of split-body interventions.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Jul;28(7):1998-2014. doi: 10.1177/0962280217746436. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
7
A simple and robust method for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
Stat Med. 2017 Jan 15;36(1):105-121. doi: 10.1002/sim.7093. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
8
Meta-analysis of studies with bivariate binary outcomes: a marginal beta-binomial model approach.
Stat Med. 2016 Jan 15;35(1):21-40. doi: 10.1002/sim.6620. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
9
A composite likelihood method for bivariate meta-analysis in diagnostic systematic reviews.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Apr;26(2):914-930. doi: 10.1177/0962280214562146. Epub 2014 Dec 14.
10
mmeta: An R Package for Multivariate Meta-Analysis.
J Stat Softw. 2014 Jan 1;56(11):11.

本文引用的文献

1
Prioritizing GWAS results: A review of statistical methods and recommendations for their application.
Am J Hum Genet. 2010 Jan;86(1):6-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.11.017.
3
Meta-analysis in genome-wide association studies.
Pharmacogenomics. 2009 Feb;10(2):191-201. doi: 10.2217/14622416.10.2.191.
4
An alternative model for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis when the within-study correlations are unknown.
Biostatistics. 2008 Jan;9(1):172-86. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm023. Epub 2007 Jul 11.
5
Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;59(12):1331-2; author reply 1332-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.011. Epub 2006 Sep 28.
7
Frequentist performance of Bayesian confidence intervals for comparing proportions in 2 x 2 contingency tables.
Biometrics. 2005 Jun;61(2):515-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.031228.x.
10
The estimation and significance of the logarithm of a ratio of frequencies.
Ann Hum Genet. 1956 May;20(4):309-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1955.tb01285.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验