An Empirical Bayes Method for Multivariate Meta-analysis with an Application in Clinical Trials.
作者信息
Chen Yong, Luo Sheng, Chu Haitao, Su Xiao, Nie Lei
出版信息
Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2014 Jul 29;43(16):3536-3551. doi: 10.1080/03610926.2012.700379.
Abstract
We propose an empirical Bayes method for evaluating overall and study-specific treatment effects in multivariate meta-analysis with binary outcome. Instead of modeling transformed proportions or risks via commonly used multivariate general or generalized linear models, we directly model the risks without any transformation. The exact posterior distribution of the study-specific relative risk is derived. The hyperparameters in the posterior distribution can be inferred through an empirical Bayes procedure. As our method does not rely on the choice of transformation, it provides a flexible alternative to the existing methods and in addition, the correlation parameter can be intuitively interpreted as the correlation coefficient between risks.
摘要
相似文献
1
An Empirical Bayes Method for Multivariate Meta-analysis with an Application in Clinical Trials.
Commun Stat Theory Methods. 2014 Jul 29;43(16):3536-3551. doi: 10.1080/03610926.2012.700379.
2
Bayesian inference on risk differences: an application to multivariate meta-analysis of adverse events in clinical trials.
Stat Biopharm Res. 2013 May 1;5(2):142-155. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2013.791483.
3
Meta-analysis of studies with bivariate binary outcomes: a marginal beta-binomial model approach.
Stat Med. 2016 Jan 15;35(1):21-40. doi: 10.1002/sim.6620. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
4
Bayesian analysis on meta-analysis of case-control studies accounting for within-study correlation.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2015 Dec;24(6):836-55. doi: 10.1177/0962280211430889. Epub 2011 Dec 4.
5
mmeta: An R Package for Multivariate Meta-Analysis.
J Stat Softw. 2014 Jan 1;56(11):11.
6
Using empirical Bayes predictors from generalized linear mixed models to test and visualize associations among longitudinal outcomes.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 May;28(5):1399-1411. doi: 10.1177/0962280218758357. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
7
Use of copula to model within-study association in bivariate meta-analysis of binomial data at the aggregate level: A Bayesian approach and application to surrogate endpoint evaluation.
Stat Med. 2022 Nov 10;41(25):4961-4981. doi: 10.1002/sim.9547. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
8
Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data.
Stat Med. 2010 Dec 20;29(29):3046-67. doi: 10.1002/sim.4040.
9
Bivariate random effects models for meta-analysis of comparative studies with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2012 Dec;21(6):621-33. doi: 10.1177/0962280210393712. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
10
Assessing the hierarchical beta-binomial model as a basic information sharing tool in basket trials.
J Biopharm Stat. 2024 Sep 26:1-33. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2024.2399203.
引用本文的文献
1
Meta-analysis with zero-event studies: a comparative study with application to COVID-19 data.
Mil Med Res. 2021 Jul 3;8(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40779-021-00331-6.
2
Bayesian hierarchical methods for meta-analysis combining randomized-controlled and single-arm studies.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 May;28(5):1293-1310. doi: 10.1177/0962280218754928. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
3
A composite likelihood method for bivariate meta-analysis in diagnostic systematic reviews.
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Apr;26(2):914-930. doi: 10.1177/0962280214562146. Epub 2014 Dec 14.
4
mmeta: An R Package for Multivariate Meta-Analysis.
J Stat Softw. 2014 Jan 1;56(11):11.
本文引用的文献
1
Multivariate meta-analysis: potential and promise.
Stat Med. 2011 Sep 10;30(20):2481-98. doi: 10.1002/sim.4172. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
2
The Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) study: paving the way for new diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;202(6):654.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.006.
3
Type 2 diabetes mellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lancet. 2009 May 23;373(9677):1773-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60731-5.
4
Meta-analysis of diagnostic studies: a comparison of random intercept, normal-normal, and binomial-normal bivariate summary ROC approaches.
Med Decis Making. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):639-49. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08323917. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
5
Risk of development of diabetes mellitus after diagnosis of gestational diabetes.
CMAJ. 2008 Jul 29;179(3):229-34. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.080012.
6
Prevalence of type 2 diabetes among women with a previous history of gestational diabetes mellitus.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 Jul;81(1):124-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.02.017. Epub 2008 May 23.
7
A 20-year prospective study of childbearing and incidence of diabetes in young women, controlling for glycemia before conception: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study.
Diabetes. 2007 Dec;56(12):2990-6. doi: 10.2337/db07-1024. Epub 2007 Sep 26.
8
An alternative model for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis when the within-study correlations are unknown.
Biostatistics. 2008 Jan;9(1):172-86. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm023. Epub 2007 Jul 11.
9
Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis and the estimation of between-study correlation.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007 Jan 12;7:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-3.
10
Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;59(12):1331-2; author reply 1332-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.06.011. Epub 2006 Sep 28.
Zotero 插件