• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辐射风险的主观感知。

Subjective perception of radiation risk.

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

J Nucl Med. 2011 Dec;52 Suppl 2:29S-35S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.085720.

DOI:10.2967/jnumed.110.085720
PMID:22144552
Abstract

Physicians, medical staff, and patients, much like the general population, are becoming increasingly sensitized to the issue of radiation exposure from diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. The attitudes of patients undergoing diagnostic imaging procedures that use ionizing radiation vary widely. Patient perception of radiation dose strongly influences their acceptance of diagnostic examinations or therapies involving radioactivity. Here, we review perceptions and concerns about radiation and radioactivity by laypersons and medical experts. Several studies show that physicians are frequently poorly informed about radiation levels associated with nuclear medicine and radiologic examinations. In addition, patients' decisions against undergoing an imaging procedure are frequently based on partial and sometimes incorrect information. Thus, physicians must take the concerns of their patients seriously. From the literature and our own experience, we conclude that it is extremely important to thoroughly and carefully educate all involved in patient work-up about radiation exposure levels and perceived or actual health risks. Although the choice and timing of imaging examinations should always outweigh the risk that secondary illness will develop, the patients' concerns still must be alleviated.

摘要

医生、医务人员和患者,就像一般大众一样,对诊断或治疗程序中的辐射暴露问题越来越敏感。接受使用电离辐射的诊断成像程序的患者的态度差异很大。患者对辐射剂量的感知强烈影响他们对涉及放射性的诊断检查或治疗的接受程度。在这里,我们回顾了非专业人士和医学专家对辐射和放射性的看法和担忧。多项研究表明,医生经常对核医学和放射学检查相关的辐射水平知之甚少。此外,患者拒绝进行成像程序的决定经常基于部分且有时是不正确的信息。因此,医生必须认真对待患者的担忧。根据文献和我们自己的经验,我们得出的结论是,彻底、仔细地向所有参与患者检查的人员教育辐射暴露水平以及感知或实际健康风险极其重要。尽管选择和时间成像检查应始终大于继发疾病发展的风险,但仍必须减轻患者的担忧。

相似文献

1
Subjective perception of radiation risk.辐射风险的主观感知。
J Nucl Med. 2011 Dec;52 Suppl 2:29S-35S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.085720.
2
Radiation and your patient: a guide for medical practitioners.辐射与您的患者:医学从业者指南
Ann ICRP. 2001;31(4):5-31.
3
A doctor talks about radiation risk from medical imaging.一位医生谈论医学成像带来的辐射风险。
Harv Womens Health Watch. 2010 Oct;18(2):4-5.
4
The physician should benefit, not harm the patient.医生应该使患者受益,而不是伤害患者。
Hell J Nucl Med. 2006 May-Aug;9(2):82-4.
5
Perception of radiation exposure and risk among patients, medical students, and referring physicians at a tertiary care community hospital.三级社区医院的患者、医学生和转诊医生对辐射暴露和风险的认知。
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2013 Aug;64(3):208-12. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Dec 23.
6
Communicating the harmful effects of radiation exposure from medical imaging: malpractice considerations.交流医学影像辐射暴露的有害影响:医疗事故考量。
Health Phys. 2011 Nov;101(5):583-8. doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3182259a81.
7
Significance of radiation dose in medical imaging.医学成像中辐射剂量的意义。
Minn Med. 2009 Dec;92(12):42-4.
8
[Sustainability of medical imaging in cardiology].[心脏病学中医学成像的可持续性]
Recenti Prog Med. 2006 Nov;97(11):652-62.
9
Regarding: Rosenthal DI, Glatstein E. "We've Got a Treatment, but What's the Disease?" The Oncologist 1996;1.关于:罗森塔尔·迪、格拉茨坦·埃。《我们有了一种治疗方法,但疾病是什么?》,《肿瘤学家》1996年;第1期。
Oncologist. 1997;2(1):59-61.
10
Effective patient education in medical imaging: public perceptions of radiation exposure risk.医学成像中的有效患者教育:公众对辐射暴露风险的认知。
J Allied Health. 2002 Fall;31(3):159-64.

引用本文的文献

1
EANM procedural recommendations for managing the paediatric patient in diagnostic nuclear medicine.EANM 程序建议,用于管理诊断核医学中的儿科患者。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023 Nov;50(13):3862-3879. doi: 10.1007/s00259-023-06357-3. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
2
The why, who, how, and what of communicating CT radiation risks to patients and healthcare providers.向患者和医疗服务提供者传达CT辐射风险的原因、对象、方式及内容。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Apr;48(4):1514-1525. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03778-w. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
3
Improper weapons are a neglected category of harmful objects.
不当武器是被忽视的有害物类别。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 22;12(1):20078. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24613-8.
4
A Survey of Awareness of Parents and Caretakers on Diagnostic Radiological Examination Related Radiation Exposure in a Tertiary Hospital in Malaysia.马来西亚一家三级医院家长和看护者对诊断放射检查相关辐射暴露认知的调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 25;19(7):3898. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073898.
5
Assessment of Health Professionals' Attitudes on Radiation Protection Measures.评估卫生专业人员对辐射防护措施的态度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 19;18(24):13380. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413380.
6
Radiation exposure awareness from patients undergoing nuclear medicine diagnostic 99mTc-MDP bone scans and 2-deoxy-2-(18F) fluoro-D-glucose PET/computed tomography scans.核医学诊断 99mTc-MDP 骨扫描和 2-脱氧-2-(18F)氟代-D-葡萄糖 PET/CT 扫描患者的辐射暴露意识。
Nucl Med Commun. 2020 Jun;41(6):582-588. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001177.
7
Patient Knowledge and Perception of Radiation Risk in Diagnostic Imaging: A Cross-Sectional Study.患者对诊断性成像中辐射风险的认知与看法:一项横断面研究。
J Patient Exp. 2020 Feb;7(1):110-115. doi: 10.1177/2374373518825118. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
8
Attitudes and Perceptions Towards Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients: The Role of a Multidisciplinary Care Team.乳腺癌患者对放射治疗的态度和看法:多学科护理团队的作用。
J Cancer Educ. 2021 Jun;36(3):639-645. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01677-1.
9
Drivers and strategies for avoiding overuse. A cross-sectional study to explore the experience of Spanish primary care providers handling uncertainty and patients' requests.避免过度医疗的驱动因素和策略。一项横断面研究,旨在探索西班牙初级保健提供者处理不确定性和患者需求的经验。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 15;8(6):e021339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021339.
10
Computed tomography and patient risk: Facts, perceptions and uncertainties.计算机断层扫描与患者风险:事实、认知与不确定性。
World J Radiol. 2016 Dec 28;8(12):902-915. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i12.902.