Department of Liver Disease and Digestive Interventional Radiology, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, No. 15 West Changle Road, 710032 Xi'an, China.
Dig Dis Sci. 2012 Apr;57(4):1072-82. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1975-5. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
Portal cavernoma is regarded as a contraindication to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).
To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of TIPS for symptomatic portal hypertension in non-cirrhotic patients with portal cavernoma.
Between July 2002 and December 2009, 46 consecutive non-cirrhotic patients with portal cavernoma were admitted to our center. Twenty patients presented with variceal rebleeding (n = 20) and refractory ascites (n = 1), and were treated with TIPS. They were followed until either death or July 2010. Data were compared using the Fisher's exact test or t test.
TIPS were successfully placed in 35% (7/20) of patients via a transjugular approach alone (n = 1), a combined transjugular/transhepatic approach (n = 4), and a combined transjugular/transsplenic approach (n = 2). TIPS were inserted in a large collateral vein in two patients in whom recanalization of the occluded main portal vein was impossible. Procedure-related complication was hepatic capsule perforation in one patient who was cured by medical therapy alone. Shunt dysfunction occurred in two patients, but TIPS revision was failed in one of them. Portosystemic pressure gradient was significantly reduced in TIPS success group (26.3 ± 1.1 vs. 12.4 ± 1.1 mmHg, p < 0.001). The incidence of variceal bleeding in TIPS success group is lower than that in TIPS failure group (14 vs. 69%, p = 0.057). In TIPS success group, two patients died of systemic infection and accident, respectively. In TIPS failure group, two patients died of liver failure.
TIPS procedures are feasible and safe in selected patients with portal cavernoma. Successful TIPS insertions may decrease the incidence of variceal rebleeding.
门脉海绵状瘤被认为是经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)的禁忌证。
评估 TIPS 治疗非肝硬化门静脉海绵状瘤伴症状性门静脉高压的可行性、安全性和疗效。
2002 年 7 月至 2009 年 12 月,我们中心收治了 46 例连续的非肝硬化门静脉海绵状瘤患者。20 例患者因静脉曲张再出血(n = 20)和难治性腹水(n = 1)而接受 TIPS 治疗。他们随访至死亡或 2010 年 7 月。使用 Fisher 确切检验或 t 检验比较数据。
20 例患者中有 35%(7/20)经单纯经颈静脉途径(n = 1)、经颈静脉/经肝途径(n = 4)和经颈静脉/经脾途径(n = 2)成功放置 TIPS。2 例患者因闭塞主门静脉再通困难而在较大的侧支静脉中置入 TIPS。1 例患者发生肝包膜穿孔,仅经药物治疗治愈。2 例患者发生分流功能障碍,但 1 例 TIPS 再通失败。TIPS 成功组门静脉系统压力梯度显著降低(26.3 ± 1.1 比 12.4 ± 1.1 mmHg,p < 0.001)。TIPS 成功组静脉曲张出血发生率低于 TIPS 失败组(14 比 69%,p = 0.057)。TIPS 成功组 2 例患者分别死于全身感染和意外,TIPS 失败组 2 例患者死于肝功能衰竭。
在选择的门静脉海绵状瘤患者中,TIPS 操作是可行和安全的。成功的 TIPS 置入可能会降低静脉曲张再出血的发生率。