Hépatogastroentérologie CHU Trousseau, F 37044 Tours Cedex, France.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Sep;22(9):1093-8. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328338d995.
Many researchers consider portal thrombosis (PT) as a contraindication to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the feasibility and long-term prognosis of TIPS in cirrhotic patients, with and without, complete PT.
Four hundred and thirty-six consecutive cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension were referred for TIPS, between 1990 and 2004. These patients were divided into two groups according to their portal patency. PT+: 34 patients with complete PT with cavernoma (19) or without (15) cavernoma versus PT-: 402 patients with normal portal patency (308) and partial PT (94). Epidemiological data were compared using the chi and Student's t-tests, and comparative evolution was made from actuarial data using the log-rank test.
PT+ patients were more frequently women with viral hepatitis, and TIPS was performed more often for bleeding indications. The TIPS success rate was significantly lower in the PT+ group (79%) than in the PT- group (99.5%) (P<10). Presence of a cavernoma decreased the success rate to 63%. TIPS was always feasible in cases of recent PT and portal cavernoma with an accessible intrahepatic patent portal branch. Early and late outcome and complications were not significantly different between the two groups.
Complete PT does not modify TIPS' long-term outcome. Rather than a contraindication, PT should be considered as an indication for TIPS in cirrhotic patients with accessible intrahepatic portal vein. Further randomized studies should be planned in cirrhotic patients with recent PT to better qualify TIPS and anticoagulation indications, respectively.
许多研究人员认为门静脉血栓形成(PT)是经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)的禁忌证。本回顾性研究的目的是比较伴有和不伴有完全性 PT 的肝硬化患者行 TIPS 的可行性和长期预后。
1990 年至 2004 年期间,共有 436 例门静脉高压的连续肝硬化患者因 TIPS 而被转诊。这些患者根据其门静脉通畅情况分为两组。PT+:34 例完全性 PT 伴海绵状(19 例)或不伴海绵状(15 例)患者;PT-:402 例门静脉通畅(308 例)和部分性 PT(94 例)患者。使用卡方检验和学生 t 检验比较了两组的流行病学数据,并使用对数秩检验对两组的累计生存率进行了比较。
PT+患者中女性和病毒性肝炎更为常见,且 TIPS 更多地用于出血适应证。PT+组 TIPS 的成功率明显低于 PT-组(79%比 99.5%)(P<10)。存在海绵状则会使成功率降低至 63%。只要新近发生的 PT 和有可利用的肝内门静脉分支的门静脉海绵状,TIPS 始终是可行的。两组的早期和晚期结果及并发症无显著差异。
完全性 PT 并不改变 TIPS 的长期预后。PT 不应被视为肝硬化患者 TIPS 的禁忌证,而应将其视为可行的适应证,尤其是对于有可利用的肝内门静脉分支的患者。应计划在近期发生 PT 的肝硬化患者中进行进一步的随机研究,以更好地确定 TIPS 和抗凝适应证。