Assuring the patient centeredness of patient-reported outcomes: content validity in medical product development and comparative effectiveness research.
作者信息
Basch Ethan, Abernethy Amy P, Reeve Bryce B
出版信息
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):965-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.10.002.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Assuring the patient centeredness of patient-reported outcomes: content validity in medical product development and comparative effectiveness research.确保患者报告结局以患者为中心：医疗产品开发和比较效果研究中的内容效度。
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):965-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.10.002.
2
Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding.内容效度——在新开发的用于医疗产品评估的患者报告结局（PRO）工具中建立和报告证据：ISPOR PRO 良好研究实践工作组报告：第 2 部分——评估受访者的理解。
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):978-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
3
Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1--eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument.内容效度——在新开发的用于医疗产品评估的患者报告结局（PRO）工具中建立和报告证据：ISPOR PRO 良好研究实践工作组报告：第 1 部分——为新 PRO 工具征集概念。
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):967-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.014. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
4
Interviewing to develop Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) measures for clinical research: eliciting patients' experience.为临床研究制定患者报告结局（PRO）指标的访谈：获取患者的体验
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Feb 5;12:15. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-15.
5
[Motivational interviews: what are their effectiveness in prevalent primary care problems?].[动机性访谈：在常见的基层医疗问题中其效果如何？]
Aten Primaria. 2008 May;40(5):257-61. doi: 10.1157/13120020.
6
Validating English- and Spanish-language patient-reported outcome measures in underserved patients with rheumatic disease.验证英语和西班牙语患者报告的风湿性疾病服务不足患者的结果测量。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2011 Jan 5;13(1):R1. doi: 10.1186/ar3219.
7
Exploring and Leveraging Known Resources to Support Pediatric Clinical Outcomes Assessment (COA) Development.探索和利用已知资源以支持儿科临床结局评估（COA）的发展。
Curr Pediatr Rev. 2020;16(3):232-240. doi: 10.2174/1573396316666200331132259.
8
PRO development: rigorous qualitative research as the crucial foundation.专业发展：严谨的定性研究是关键基础。
Qual Life Res. 2010 Oct;19(8):1087-96. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9677-6. Epub 2010 May 30.
9
Questionnaire validation practice: a protocol for a systematic descriptive literature review of health literacy assessments.问卷验证实践：健康素养评估系统描述性文献综述的方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):e030753. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030753.
10
Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research.定性研究方法和混合研究方法为结果研究做出了独特贡献。
Circulation. 2009 Mar 17;119(10):1442-52. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.742775.
引用本文的文献
1
Recommendations for evaluation of neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction after spinal cord injury and/or disease.脊髓损伤和/或疾病后神经源性膀胱和肠功能障碍的评估建议。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2020 Mar;43(2):141-164. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1706033.
2
Need for Digital Biomarkers in Musculoskeletal Trials.肌肉骨骼试验中对数字生物标志物的需求。
Digit Biomark. 2017 Aug 17;1(1):82-86. doi: 10.1159/000479753. eCollection 2017 Sep-Dec.
3
Truthfulness in patient-reported outcomes: factors affecting patients' responses and impact on data quality.患者报告结局中的真实性：影响患者回答的因素及其对数据质量的影响。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2019 Jun 11;10:171-186. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S178344. eCollection 2019.
4
Ophthalmology Patient Perceptions of Open Payments Information.眼科患者对公开支付信息的看法。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec 1;136(12):1375-1381. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.4167.
5
Maintaining primacy of the patient perspective in the development of patient-centered patient reported outcomes.在以患者为中心的患者报告结局的制定过程中保持患者视角的首要地位。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 3;12(3):e0171114. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171114. eCollection 2017.
6
On the validity of measuring change over time in routine clinical assessment: a close examination of item-level response shifts in psychosomatic inpatients.关于常规临床评估中随时间变化测量的有效性：对身心疾病住院患者项目层面反应转移的深入研究。
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jun;25(6):1339-47. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1123-3. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
7
Use of novel technology-based techniques to improve alcohol-related outcomes in clinical trials.利用基于新技术的技术来改善临床试验中与酒精相关的结果。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2013 Nov-Dec;48(6):712-9. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agt134. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
本文引用的文献
1
Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: part 2--assessing respondent understanding.内容效度——在新开发的用于医疗产品评估的患者报告结局（PRO）工具中建立和报告证据：ISPOR PRO 良好研究实践工作组报告：第 2 部分——评估受访者的理解。
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):978-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
2
Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1--eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument.内容效度——在新开发的用于医疗产品评估的患者报告结局（PRO）工具中建立和报告证据：ISPOR PRO 良好研究实践工作组报告：第 1 部分——为新 PRO 工具征集概念。
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):967-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.014. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
3
Content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: perspectives from a PROMIS meeting.患者报告结局测量的内容效度：来自 PROMIS 会议的观点。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Jun;21(5):739-46. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9990-8. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
4
The Brief Pain Inventory and its "pain at its worst in the last 24 hours" item: clinical trial endpoint considerations.简短疼痛量表及其“过去 24 小时内最剧烈的疼痛”项目：临床试验终点的考虑因素。
Pain Med. 2010 Mar;11(3):337-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00774.x. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
5
Evaluation of item candidates: the PROMIS qualitative item review.条目候选的评估：患者报告结果测量信息系统（PROMIS）定性条目审查
Med Care. 2007 May;45(5 Suppl 1):S12-21. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000254567.79743.e2.
6
Use of the McGill pain questionnaire in the assessment of cancer pain: replicability and consistency.麦吉尔疼痛问卷在癌症疼痛评估中的应用：可重复性和一致性。
Pain. 1980 Jun;8(3):377-387. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(80)90081-0.
Zotero 插件