Suppr超能文献

国家卫生与临床优化研究所单一技术评估流程:头四年的经验教训。

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Single Technology Appraisal process: lessons from the first 4 years.

机构信息

ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.

出版信息

Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):1158-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Single Technology Appraisal (STA) process in the United Kingdom was established in 2005 in order to provide guidance on new technologies as close to their launch as possible. The NICE recommended timeframe for completion of an STA is 34 weeks. The purpose of this study was to map the first 95 STAs to collect information on a range of issues including timelines and appraisal decisions.

METHODS

A mapping tool was devised to collect information from the NICE Web site. Data were analyzed by calculating frequencies. Simple descriptive statistics were applied where appropriate.

RESULTS

Ninety-five STAs were included in the analysis. Almost one-third (30/95) initially identified topics did not go on to be appraised often due to licensing issues. Timelines were measured for 29 completed STAs. Eight (28%) of these were completed by 37 weeks and 20 (69%) by 42 weeks. When STAs with appeals were excluded, 31% (8/26) were completed by 37 weeks and 85% (22/26) by 42 weeks. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios reported by manufacturers were consistently lower than those estimated by the evidence review groups. In all, 76% (38/50) of the completed STAs resulted in an approval.

CONCLUSIONS

The NICE Web site enabled access to almost all necessary information, although electronic documents were sometimes difficult to locate. One-third of the referred topics were suspended or terminated. The NICE STA process is slower than initially anticipated and this is primarily due to events outside of NICE's direct control.

摘要

目的

英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)的单一技术评估(STA)程序于 2005 年建立,旨在尽可能在新技术推出时就为其提供指导。NICE 建议完成 STA 的时间框架为 34 周。本研究旨在对前 95 项 STA 进行映射,以收集有关各种问题的信息,包括时间表和评估决策。

方法

设计了一个映射工具来从 NICE 网站收集信息。通过计算频率来分析数据。在适当的情况下应用了简单的描述性统计。

结果

95 项 STA 被纳入分析。由于许可问题,最初确定的主题中有近三分之一(30/95)没有进行评估。对 29 项已完成 STA 的时间表进行了测量。其中 8 项(28%)在 37 周内完成,20 项(69%)在 42 周内完成。当排除具有上诉的 STA 时,31%(8/26)在 37 周内完成,85%(22/26)在 42 周内完成。制造商报告的增量成本效益比始终低于证据审查小组估计的成本效益比。在所有已完成的 STA 中,76%(38/50)的结果是批准。

结论

NICE 网站使几乎所有必要的信息都可以访问,尽管有时电子文档难以定位。三分之一的参考主题被暂停或终止。NICE STA 程序比最初预期的要慢,这主要是由于 NICE 无法直接控制的事件。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验