Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Jan;16(1):81-91. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.009. Epub 2011 Dec 10.
A key criticism of the main diagnostic tool in psychiatry, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders (DSM-IV), is that it lacks a biological footing. In this article, we argue for a biological approach to psychiatry based on 'neurocognitive endophenotypes', whereby changes in behavioural or cognitive processes are associated with discrete deficits in defined neural systems. We focus on the constructs of impulsivity and compulsivity as key examples of the approach and discuss their possible cross-diagnostic significance, applying them to co-morbidities and commonalities across a range of disorders (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, substance dependence, obsessive-compulsive disorder and eating disorders). We argue that this approach has important implications for the future classification of psychiatric disorders, genetics and therapeutics.
精神病学主要诊断工具《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM-IV)的一个主要批评是它缺乏生物学基础。本文我们主张基于“神经认知内表型”的精神病学生物学方法,即行为或认知过程的变化与特定神经系统的离散缺陷相关。我们关注冲动性和强迫性等结构作为该方法的关键范例,并讨论它们在多种障碍(注意缺陷/多动障碍、物质依赖、强迫症和饮食障碍)中的可能跨诊断意义。我们认为,这种方法对精神障碍的未来分类、遗传学和治疗具有重要意义。