DePaul University, Chicago, IL 60614, USA.
Eval Health Prof. 2012 Sep;35(3):280-304. doi: 10.1177/0163278711424281. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
This article uses data from patients recruited using the 1994 case definition of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) to contrast those meeting criteria for the Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) Canadian case definition with those that did not meet these criteria. The study also contrasts those meeting criteria for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) based on criteria from Ramsay and other theorists with those that did not meet the ME criteria. The ME/CFS case definition criteria identified a subset of patients with more functional impairments and physical, mental, and cognitive problems than the subset not meeting these criteria. The ME subset had more functional impairments, and more severe physical and cognitive symptoms than the subset not meeting ME criteria. When applied to a population meeting the 1994 CFS case definition, both ME/CFS and ME criteria appear to select a more severe subset of patients.
本文使用了根据 1994 年慢性疲劳综合征 (CFS) 病例定义招募的患者数据,将符合肌痛性脑脊髓炎/慢性疲劳综合征 (ME/CFS) 加拿大病例定义标准的患者与不符合这些标准的患者进行对比。该研究还将基于 Ramsay 和其他理论家标准符合肌痛性脑脊髓炎 (ME) 标准的患者与不符合 ME 标准的患者进行对比。ME/CFS 病例定义标准确定了一组比不符合这些标准的患者具有更多功能障碍以及身体、心理和认知问题的患者亚组。ME 亚组的功能障碍更多,且身体和认知症状比不符合 ME 标准的患者亚组更严重。当应用于符合 1994 年 CFS 病例定义的人群时,ME/CFS 和 ME 标准似乎都选择了一组更严重的患者。