Department of Endocrinology, Osteoporosis, and Reproductive Medicine, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Osteoporos Int. 2012 Aug;23(8):2141-50. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1856-y. Epub 2011 Dec 13.
The effect of teriparatide and risedronate on back pain was tested, and there was no difference in the proportion of patients experiencing a reduction in back pain between groups after 6 or 18 months. Patients receiving teriparatide had greater increases in bone mineral density and had fewer vertebral fractures.
This study aimed to understand the effect of teriparatide in reducing back pain in patients with prevalent back pain and vertebral fracture compared to risedronate.
In an 18-month randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial, we investigated the effects of teriparatide (20 μg/day) vs. risedronate (35 mg/week) in postmenopausal women with back pain likely due to vertebral fracture. The primary objective was to compare the proportion of subjects reporting ≥30% reduction in worst back pain severity from baseline to 6 months as assessed by a numeric rating scale in each treatment group. Pre-specified secondary and exploratory outcomes included assessments of average and worst back pain at additional time points, disability and quality of life, bone mineral density, incidence of fractures, and safety.
At 6 months, 59% of teriparatide and 57% of risedronate patients reported ≥30% reduction in worst back pain and there were no differences between groups in the proportion of patients experiencing reduction in worst or average back pain at any time point, disability, or quality of life. There was a greater increase from baseline in bone mineral density at the lumbar spine (p = 0.001) and femoral neck (p = 0.02) with teriparatide compared to risedronate and a lower incidence of vertebral fractures at 18 months (4% teriparatide and 9% risedronate; p = 0.01). Vertebral fractures were less severe (p = 0.04) in the teriparatide group. There was no difference in the overall incidence of adverse events.
Although there were no differences in back pain-related endpoints, patients receiving teriparatide had greater skeletal benefit than those receiving risedronate.
测试了特立帕肽和利塞膦酸钠对背痛的影响,6 个月和 18 个月后,两组患者背痛减轻的比例没有差异。接受特立帕肽治疗的患者骨密度增加更多,且椎体骨折更少。
本研究旨在比较特立帕肽与利塞膦酸钠对伴有常见背痛和椎体骨折的患者减轻背痛的效果。
在一项为期 18 个月的随机、双盲、双模拟试验中,我们研究了特立帕肽(20μg/天)与利塞膦酸钠(35mg/周)治疗背痛可能由椎体骨折引起的绝经后妇女的效果。主要目的是比较两组患者报告的数字评定量表(Numeric Rating Scale)评估的自基线至 6 个月时最差背痛严重程度较基线至少减轻 30%的比例。预先规定的次要和探索性结局包括在每个治疗组中评估其他时间点的平均和最差背痛、残疾和生活质量、骨密度、骨折发生率和安全性。
在 6 个月时,特立帕肽组 59%和利塞膦酸钠组 57%的患者报告了最差背痛减轻至少 30%,两组患者在任何时间点报告最差或平均背痛减轻的比例、残疾或生活质量均无差异。与利塞膦酸钠相比,特立帕肽组的腰椎(p=0.001)和股骨颈(p=0.02)骨密度从基线的增加更大,18 个月时椎体骨折的发生率更低(特立帕肽组 4%,利塞膦酸钠组 9%;p=0.01)。特立帕肽组的椎体骨折程度较轻(p=0.04)。不良事件的总发生率无差异。
尽管在与背痛相关的终点方面无差异,但接受特立帕肽治疗的患者的骨骼获益大于接受利塞膦酸钠治疗的患者。