• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The QALY--a measure of social value rather than individual utility?

作者信息

Nord E

机构信息

National Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Health Econ. 1994 Mar-Apr;3(2):89-93. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730030205.

DOI:10.1002/hec.4730030205
PMID:8044215
Abstract

The paper examines different interpretations of the QALY concept. It is suggested that the QALY interpreted as a measure of amounts of well-life does not carry sufficient empirical meaning. As a measure of individuals' personal appreciation of outcomes in their own lives the QALY does not seem to work in comparisons of life saving interventions with interventions that improve health or increase life expectancy. For the QALY to be a generally empirically meaningful concept, it looks as though it needs to be interpreted as a measure of social value. This conclusion has direct implications for how values for health states should be elicited.

摘要

相似文献

1
The QALY--a measure of social value rather than individual utility?
Health Econ. 1994 Mar-Apr;3(2):89-93. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730030205.
2
QALYs for resource allocation: probably not and certainly not now.
Aust J Public Health. 1993 Sep;17(3):278-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.1993.tb00150.x.
3
QALY league tables: handle with care.质量调整生命年排行榜:谨慎对待。
Health Econ. 1993 Apr;2(1):59-64. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730020108.
4
[Pharmacoeconomics in uro-oncology: the concept of QALYs].[泌尿肿瘤学中的药物经济学:质量调整生命年的概念]
Urologe A. 2011 Dec;50(12):1573-7. doi: 10.1007/s00120-011-2731-3.
5
Cost-utility analysis.成本效用分析
BMJ. 1993 Oct 2;307(6908):859-62. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6908.859.
6
The trade-off between severity of illness and treatment effect in cost-value analysis of health care.医疗保健成本效益分析中疾病严重程度与治疗效果之间的权衡。
Health Policy. 1993 Aug;24(3):227-38. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(93)90042-n.
7
Pressure to treat and pressure to cost: a review of cost-effectiveness analysis.治疗压力与成本压力:成本效益分析综述
J Hypertens. 1991 Mar;9(3):193-8. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199103000-00001.
8
The reliability of cost-utility estimates in cost-per-QALY league tables .成本效益分析联盟表中成本效用估计的可靠性。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 May;3(5):345-53. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199303050-00002.
9
Methods for quality adjustment of life years.
Soc Sci Med. 1992 Mar;34(5):559-69. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90211-8.
10
Health Years in Total: A New Health Objective Function for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.健康总寿命:成本效益分析的一个新健康目标函数。
Value Health. 2020 Jan;23(1):96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.10.014. Epub 2019 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Eliciting Distributive Preferences in Health Care Resource Allocation: A Person Trade-Off Study.在医疗资源分配中引出分配偏好:一项个人权衡研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 30;13(11):1309. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13111309.
2
Triage of critical care resources in COVID-19: a stronger role for justice.COVID-19 危重症资源的分诊:正义发挥更大作用。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Aug;46(8):526-530. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106320. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
3
Mapping the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL™) Generic Core Scales onto the Child Health Utility Index-9 Dimension (CHU-9D) Score for Economic Evaluation in Children.
将儿科生活质量量表(PedsQL™)通用核心量表映射到儿童健康效用指数-9 维度(CHU-9D)评分,用于儿童经济评估。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Apr;36(4):451-465. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0600-7.
4
Cost-utility analysis: current methodological issues and future perspectives.成本效用分析:当前的方法学问题与未来展望
Front Pharmacol. 2011 Jun 8;2:29. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2011.00029. eCollection 2011.
5
Trading people versus trading time: what is the difference?交易人还是交易时间:有何不同?
Popul Health Metr. 2005 Nov 10;3:10. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-3-10.
6
Efficient use of health care resources: the interaction between improved health and reduced health related income loss.
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2002 Nov;2(4):285-96. doi: 10.1023/a:1022308217947.
7
Public involvement in health care priority setting: an economic perspective.公众参与医疗保健优先事项的设定:经济学视角
Health Expect. 1999 Dec;2(4):235-244. doi: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1999.00061.x.
8
Resource allocation within Australian indigenous communities: a program for implementing vertical equity.澳大利亚原住民社区的资源分配:一项实施垂直公平的计划。
Health Care Anal. 2000;8(3):217-33. doi: 10.1023/A:1009458714162.
9
Vertical equity in health care resource allocation.医疗保健资源分配中的纵向公平性。
Health Care Anal. 2000;8(3):203-15. doi: 10.1023/A:1009439917796.