Joan Karnell Cancer Center, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19106, USA.
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Sep;20(9):2089-96. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1318-2. Epub 2011 Dec 11.
In July 2007, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) limited coverage of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) through a National Coverage Determination (NCD). The primary objective of this study was to compare transfusion rates in patients with CIA with lung, breast, or colorectal cancer before and after the NCD.
Adult Medicare patients with CIA treated at 49 community oncology clinics were selected from two time periods based on clinics' NCD implementation date. Chart data were abstracted for 12 weeks post-CIA episode start, defined as hemoglobin (Hb) level <11 g/dL while receiving chemotherapy or within 60 days of the last chemotherapy dose. Multivariate analyses were used to calculate the odds of transfusion and to assess the units of blood transfused, controlling for differences in demographics, clinical history, and chemotherapy.
Eight hundred pre-NCD and 994 post-NCD patients from 49 sites were selected. Of the patients, 56% used ESAs post-NCD vs. 88% pre-NCD (p < 0.0001). The duration of ESA use decreased in the post-NCD (32.1 days) vs. pre-NCD (48.4 days, p < 0.0001) group. The post-NCD group reported significantly lower Hb levels, higher odds of receiving a transfusion (odds ratio: 1.41, 95% CI 1.05-1.89, p = 0.0238) and increased blood utilization of 53% (units transfused: OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.15-2.04, p = 0.0034).
Decreased frequency and duration of ESA administration were reported in the post-NCD vs. pre-NCD period. Findings were accompanied by a modest but statistically significant increase in transfusions and a decrease in Hb values.
2007 年 7 月,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)通过国家覆盖决定(NCD)限制了癌症患者化疗引起的贫血(CIA)的促红细胞生成素刺激剂(ESA)的覆盖范围。本研究的主要目的是比较 NCD 前后患有肺癌、乳腺癌或结直肠癌的 CIA 患者的输血率。
根据诊所实施 NCD 的日期,从两个时期选择在 49 家社区肿瘤诊所接受 CIA 治疗的成年医疗保险患者。从 CIA 发作开始后 12 周(定义为接受化疗时血红蛋白(Hb)水平<11g/dL 或最后一次化疗剂量后 60 天内),对图表数据进行了摘录。使用多变量分析计算输血的几率,并评估输血单位,同时控制人口统计学,临床病史和化疗方面的差异。
从 49 个地点中选择了 800 名 NCD 前患者和 994 名 NCD 后患者。在这些患者中,56%的患者在 NCD 后使用 ESA,而 NCD 前为 88%(p<0.0001)。NCD 后(32.1 天)ESA 的使用时间短于 NCD 前(48.4 天,p<0.0001)。NCD 后组报告的 Hb 水平明显较低,接受输血的几率更高(优势比:1.41,95%CI 1.05-1.89,p=0.0238),血液利用率增加了 53%(输血单位:OR 1.53,95%CI 1.15-2.04,p=0.0034)。
与 NCD 前相比,NCD 后报告ESA 的频率和持续时间降低。发现伴随着适度但具有统计学意义的输血增加和 Hb 值降低。