Suppr超能文献

随机Ⅱ/Ⅲ期试验评估吉西他滨/卡铂和甲氨蝶呤/卡铂/长春碱在不适合顺铂为基础化疗的晚期尿路上皮癌患者中的疗效:EORTC 研究 30986。

Randomized phase II/III trial assessing gemcitabine/carboplatin and methotrexate/carboplatin/vinblastine in patients with advanced urothelial cancer who are unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy: EORTC study 30986.

机构信息

Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital and ACR-ITR Vienna/CEADDP and LBI-ACR Vienna-CTO, Kundratstraße 3,Vienna, Austria 1100.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jan 10;30(2):191-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.3571. Epub 2011 Dec 12.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This is the first randomized phase II/III trial comparing two carboplatin-based chemotherapy regimens in patients with urothelial cancer who are ineligible ("unfit") for cisplatin chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The primary objective of the phase III part of this study was to compare the overall survival (OS) of chemotherapy-naive patients with measurable disease and an impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate < 60 but > 30 mL/min) and/or performance score of 2 who were randomly assigned to receive either gemcitabine/carboplatin (GC) or methotrexate/carboplatin/vinblastine (M-CAVI). To detect an increase of 50% in median survival with GC compared with M-CAVI (13.5 v 9 months) based on a two-sided log-rank test at error rates α = .05 and β = .20, 225 patients were required. Secondary end points were overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and quality of life.

RESULTS

In all, 238 patients were randomly assigned by 29 institutions over a period of 7 years. The median follow-up was 4.5 years. Best ORRs were 41.2% (36.1% confirmed response) for patients receiving GC versus 30.3% (21.0% confirmed response) for patients receiving M-CAVI (P = .08). Median OS was 9.3 months in the GC arm and 8.1 months in the M-CAVI arm (P = .64). There was no difference in PFS (P = .78) between the two arms. Severe acute toxicity (death, grade 4 thrombocytopenia with bleeding, grade 3 or 4 renal toxicity, neutropenic fever, or mucositis) was observed in 9.3% of patients receiving GC and 21.2% of patients receiving M-CAVI.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences in efficacy between the two treatment groups. The incidence of severe acute toxicities was higher for those receiving M-CAVI.

摘要

目的

这是第一项比较两种含卡铂化疗方案在不适合顺铂化疗的尿路上皮癌患者中的疗效的随机 II/III 期试验。

患者和方法

本研究 III 期部分的主要目的是比较初治、有可测量疾病、肾功能受损(肾小球滤过率<60 但>30mL/min)和/或功能状态评分 2 的患者的总生存期(OS),这些患者随机接受吉西他滨/卡铂(GC)或甲氨蝶呤/卡铂/长春碱(M-CAVI)治疗。基于双侧对数秩检验,假设 GC 组的中位生存期比 M-CAVI 组延长 50%(13.5 个月比 9 个月),错误率 α=0.05,β=0.20,需要 225 例患者。次要终点包括总缓解率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、毒性和生活质量。

结果

共 238 例患者在 7 年内被 29 家机构随机分配。中位随访时间为 4.5 年。GC 组最佳 ORR 为 41.2%(36.1%确认为完全缓解),M-CAVI 组为 30.3%(21.0%确认为完全缓解)(P=0.08)。GC 组的中位 OS 为 9.3 个月,M-CAVI 组为 8.1 个月(P=0.64)。两组的 PFS 无差异(P=0.78)。GC 组 9.3%的患者和 M-CAVI 组 21.2%的患者发生严重急性毒性(死亡、血小板<4 级伴出血、3 或 4 级肾毒性、中性粒细胞发热或黏膜炎)。

结论

两组治疗效果无显著差异。M-CAVI 组严重急性毒性发生率较高。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Application of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer.免疫检查点抑制剂在癌症中的应用。
MedComm (2020). 2025 Aug 10;6(8):e70176. doi: 10.1002/mco2.70176. eCollection 2025 Aug.
6
Novel Strategies and Therapeutic Advances for Bladder Cancer.膀胱癌的新型策略与治疗进展
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 20;17(13):2070. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132070.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验