Department of Psychiatry, Guangzhou Psychiatric Hospital, 36 Mingxin Road, Fangcun district, Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510370, China; Laboratory of Neuropsychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; Laboratory of Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Department of Psychiatry, Guangzhou Psychiatric Hospital, 36 Mingxin Road, Fangcun district, Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510370, China.
J Affect Disord. 2014 Oct;168:184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.06.032. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
Considerable evidence has demonstrated that melancholic and atypical major depression have distinct biological correlates relative to undifferentiated major depression, but few studies have specifically delineated neuropsychological performance for them.
In a six-week prospective longitudinal study, we simultaneously compared neuropsychological performance among melancholic depression (n=142), atypical depression (n=76), undifferentiated major depression (n=91), and healthy controls (n=200) during a major depressive episode and a clinically remitted state, respectively. We administered neuropsychological tests assessing processing speed, attention, shifting, planning, verbal fluency, visual spatial memory, and verbal working memory to all participants.
During the depressive state, the three subtypes displayed extensive cognitive impairment, except for attention, when compared with the healthy controls. Melancholic depression significantly differed from atypical depression in processing speed and verbal fluency. In the remitted state, the three subtypes recovered their visual spatial memory and verbal working memory functions to the healthy control level. The recovery of the other domains (processing speed, set shifting, planning, and verbal fluency), however, was different across the subtypes. No predictive relationship existed between neuropsychological performance and the treatment outcome.
The drop-out rate in the six-week longitudinal study was relatively high.
Our data provide preliminary evidence that during depressed states the three major depressive subtypes display similar cognitive deficits in some domains but differ in such domains as processing speed and verbal fluency. The recovery of the cognitive deficits following clinical remission from depression may be associated with subtypes of major depressive disorder.
大量证据表明,与未分化的重度抑郁症相比,单相抑郁和非典型性重度抑郁症具有明显不同的生物学相关性,但很少有研究专门描述它们的神经心理学表现。
在一项为期六周的前瞻性纵向研究中,我们分别在重度抑郁发作和临床缓解期,同时比较单相抑郁(n=142)、非典型性抑郁(n=76)、未分化的重度抑郁症(n=91)和健康对照组(n=200)的神经心理学表现。我们对所有参与者进行了评估处理速度、注意力、转换、计划、语言流畅性、视觉空间记忆和言语工作记忆的神经心理学测试。
在抑郁状态下,除了注意力外,与健康对照组相比,三种亚型均表现出广泛的认知障碍。单相抑郁在处理速度和语言流畅性方面与非典型性抑郁显著不同。在缓解期,三种亚型的视觉空间记忆和言语工作记忆功能恢复到健康对照组的水平。然而,其他领域(处理速度、设定转换、计划和语言流畅性)的恢复情况在各亚型之间有所不同。神经心理学表现与治疗结果之间没有预测关系。
六周纵向研究的辍学率相对较高。
我们的数据初步表明,在抑郁状态下,三种重度抑郁亚型在某些领域表现出相似的认知缺陷,但在处理速度和语言流畅性等领域存在差异。从抑郁症的临床缓解中恢复后认知缺陷的恢复可能与重度抑郁障碍的亚型有关。