Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;53(2):197-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02469.x. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
Reviews have highlighted anxious youths' affective disturbances, specifically, elevated negative emotions and reliance on ineffective emotion regulation strategies. However, no study has examined anxious youth's emotional reactivity and regulation in real-world contexts.
This study utilized an ecological momentary assessment approach to compare real-world emotional experiences of 65 youth with generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, or social phobia (ANX) and 65 age-matched healthy controls (CON), ages 9-13 years.
Hierarchical linear models revealed that ANX reported higher levels of average past-hour peak intensity of nervous, sad and upset emotions than CON youth but similar levels during momentary reports of current emotion. As expected, ANX youth reported more frequent physiological reactions in response to a negative event; however, there were no group differences in how frequently they used cognitive-behavioral strategies. Avoidance, distraction and problem solving were associated with the down-regulation of all negative emotions except nervousness for both ANX and CON youth; however, group differences emerged for acceptance, rumination and physiological responding.
In real-world contexts, ANX youth do not report higher levels of momentary negative emotions but do report heightened negative emotions in response to challenging events. Moreover, ANX youth report no differences in how frequently they use adaptive regulatory strategies but are more likely to have physiological responses to challenging events. They are also less effective at using some strategies to down-regulate negative emotion than CON youth.
综述强调了焦虑青少年的情感障碍,特别是升高的负性情绪和对无效情绪调节策略的依赖。然而,尚无研究检查过焦虑青少年在现实情境中的情绪反应和调节。
本研究采用生态瞬时评估方法,比较了 65 名广泛性焦虑障碍、社交焦虑障碍或社交恐惧症(ANX)青少年和 65 名年龄匹配的健康对照组(CON)青少年在真实世界中的情绪体验,年龄为 9-13 岁。
分层线性模型显示,与 CON 青少年相比,ANX 青少年报告过去 1 小时内平均高峰强度的紧张、悲伤和不安情绪更高,但在当前情绪的瞬时报告中水平相似。正如预期的那样,ANX 青少年对负面事件的生理反应更为频繁;然而,他们使用认知行为策略的频率没有差异。回避、分心和解决问题与除紧张外的所有负性情绪的下调均相关,对于 ANX 和 CON 青少年都是如此;然而,在接受、沉思和生理反应方面出现了组间差异。
在现实情境中,焦虑青少年不会报告更高水平的瞬时负性情绪,但会报告对挑战性事件的负性情绪增强。此外,焦虑青少年报告他们使用适应性调节策略的频率没有差异,但更有可能对挑战性事件产生生理反应。他们在使用一些策略来下调负性情绪方面也不如 CON 青少年有效。