• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

现场条件下四种听力保护器的脉冲峰值插入损失测量。

Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss for four hearing protection devices in field conditions.

机构信息

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Hearing Loss Prevention Team, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226, USA.

出版信息

Int J Audiol. 2012 Feb;51 Suppl 1(0 1):S31-42. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.630330. Epub 2011 Dec 19.

DOI:10.3109/14992027.2011.630330
PMID:22176308
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4677999/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In 2009, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed an impulse noise reduction rating (NRR) for hearing protection devices based upon the impulse peak insertion loss (IPIL) methods in the ANSI S12.42-2010 standard. This study tests the ANSI S12.42 methods with a range of hearing protection devices measured in field conditions.

DESIGN

The method utilizes an acoustic test fixture and three ranges for impulse levels: 130-134, 148-152, and 166-170 dB peak SPL. For this study, four different models of hearing protectors were tested: Bilsom 707 Impact II electronic earmuff, E·A·R Pod Express, E·A·R Combat Arms version 4, and the Etymotic Research, Inc. Electronic BlastPLG™ EB1.

STUDY SAMPLE

Five samples of each protector were fitted on the fixture or inserted in the fixture's ear canal five times for each impulse level. Impulses were generated by a 0.223 caliber rifle.

RESULTS

The average IPILs increased with peak pressure and ranged between 20 and 38 dB. For some protectors, significant differences were observed across protector examples of the same model, and across insertions.

CONCLUSIONS

The EPA's proposed methods provide consistent and reproducible results. The proposed impulse NRR rating should utilize the minimum and maximum protection percentiles as determined by the ANSI S12.42-2010 methods.

摘要

目的

2009 年,美国环境保护署(EPA)根据 ANSI S12.42-2010 标准中的脉冲峰值插入损耗(IPIL)方法,提出了一种基于脉冲噪声降低等级(NRR)的听力保护装置。本研究采用 ANSI S12.42 方法,在现场条件下对一系列听力保护装置进行了测试。

设计

该方法利用声学测试夹具和三个脉冲水平范围:130-134、148-152 和 166-170dB 峰值 SPL。在这项研究中,测试了四种不同型号的听力保护器:Bilsom 707 Impact II 电子耳罩、E·A·R Pod Express、E·A·R Combat Arms 版本 4 和 Etymotic Research,Inc. Electronic BlastPLG™ EB1。

研究样本

每个保护器的五个样本都安装在夹具上,或在夹具的耳道中插入五次,每个脉冲水平进行五次插入。脉冲由 0.223 口径的步枪产生。

结果

平均 IPIL 随峰值压力而增加,范围在 20 到 38dB 之间。对于一些保护器,同一型号的保护器样本之间以及插入之间存在显著差异。

结论

EPA 提出的方法提供了一致和可重复的结果。拟议的脉冲 NRR 等级应利用 ANSI S12.42-2010 方法确定的最小和最大保护百分位数。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/4677999/bc36b3b370e7/nihms-742347-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/4677999/1ef2ef4b5ba6/nihms-742347-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/4677999/ad3b0ca83f82/nihms-742347-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/4677999/8d8a26538475/nihms-742347-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/4677999/66ee3a320dd5/nihms-742347-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/4677999/77a42c037b52/nihms-742347-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/4677999/5b745e257cc2/nihms-742347-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/4677999/c72a885200b5/nihms-742347-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/4677999/bc36b3b370e7/nihms-742347-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/4677999/1ef2ef4b5ba6/nihms-742347-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/4677999/ad3b0ca83f82/nihms-742347-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/4677999/8d8a26538475/nihms-742347-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/4677999/66ee3a320dd5/nihms-742347-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/4677999/77a42c037b52/nihms-742347-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/4677999/5b745e257cc2/nihms-742347-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/4677999/c72a885200b5/nihms-742347-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/909c/4677999/bc36b3b370e7/nihms-742347-f0008.jpg

相似文献

1
Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss for four hearing protection devices in field conditions.现场条件下四种听力保护器的脉冲峰值插入损失测量。
Int J Audiol. 2012 Feb;51 Suppl 1(0 1):S31-42. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.630330. Epub 2011 Dec 19.
2
Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube.使用声冲击管测量来自两个声学测试夹具和四种听力保护器条件下的脉冲峰值插入损耗。
Noise Health. 2015 Sep-Oct;17(78):364-73. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.165067.
3
Spectral analysis of hearing protector impulsive insertion loss.听力保护器脉冲插入损失的频谱分析
Int J Audiol. 2017;56(sup1):13-21. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1257869. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
4
Noise reduction at the shooting range by means of level-dependent hearing protectors.通过使用与噪声水平相关的听力保护器在射击场降低噪音。
Med Pr. 2019 Jun 14;70(3):265-273. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00730. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
5
Noise attenuation of communication hearing protectors against impulses from assault rifle.通信听力保护器对突击步枪脉冲的噪声衰减。
Mil Med. 1998 Jan;163(1):40-3.
6
Attenuation characteristics of an extended-wear hearing aid: Impulse and continuous noise.延长佩戴助听器的衰减特性:脉冲噪声和连续噪声。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Sep;148(3):1404. doi: 10.1121/10.0001899.
7
Assessment of noise exposure for indoor and outdoor firing ranges.室内和室外射击场噪声暴露评估。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2007 Sep;4(9):688-97. doi: 10.1080/15459620701537390.
8
Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise.接触枪击噪音后听力的暂时变化。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2004;17(2):285-93.
9
Hearing protection against high-level shooting impulses in relation to hearing damage risk criteria.针对与听力损伤风险标准相关的高强度射击脉冲的听力保护。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Jan;91(1):196-202. doi: 10.1121/1.402754.
10
Protection efficiency of hearing protectors against military noise from handheld weapons and vehicles.听力保护器对来自手持武器和车辆的军事噪声的防护效果。
Noise Health. 2005 Jan-Mar;7(26):11-20. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.31644.

引用本文的文献

1
A 3D Printed Human Ear Model for Standardized Testing of Hearing Protection Devices to Blast Exposure.一种用于听力保护设备对爆炸暴露标准化测试的3D打印人体耳朵模型。
Otol Neurotol Open. 2022 May 26;2(2):e010. doi: 10.1097/ONO.0000000000000010. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Selection of Level-Dependent Hearing Protectors for Use in An Indoor Shooting Range.在室内射击场使用的与级别相关的听力保护器的选择。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jun 27;16(13):2266. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132266.
3
Localization of Vehicle Back-Up Alarms by Users of Level-Dependent Hearing Protectors under Industrial Noise Conditions Generated at a Forge.在锻造厂产生的工业噪声环境下,具有级差式听力保护器的使用者对车辆倒车警报的定位。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 30;16(3):394. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030394.
4
Prevention of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss from Recreational Firearms.预防娱乐性枪支导致的噪声性听力损失。
Semin Hear. 2017 Nov;38(4):267-281. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606323. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
5
Spectral analysis of hearing protector impulsive insertion loss.听力保护器脉冲插入损失的频谱分析
Int J Audiol. 2017;56(sup1):13-21. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1257869. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
6
Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss from two acoustic test fixtures and four hearing protector conditions with an acoustic shock tube.使用声冲击管测量来自两个声学测试夹具和四种听力保护器条件下的脉冲峰值插入损耗。
Noise Health. 2015 Sep-Oct;17(78):364-73. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.165067.
7
Hearing loss associated with US military combat deployment.与美军战斗部署相关的听力损失。
Noise Health. 2015 Jan-Feb;17(74):34-42. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.149574.
8
Evaluation of hearing protection used by police officers in the shooting range.评估警察在射击场使用的听力保护装置。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Nov-Dec;80(6):515-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.08.003. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
9
Impulse noise generated by starter pistols.发令枪产生的脉冲噪声。
Int J Audiol. 2013 Feb;52 Suppl 1(0 1):S9-19. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.745650.

本文引用的文献

1
Auditory risk to unprotected bystanders exposed to firearm noise.暴露于枪支噪音中的未受保护旁观者的听觉风险。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Feb;22(2):93-103. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.2.4.
2
Effects of training on hearing protector attenuation.训练对听力保护器衰减的影响。
Noise Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;13(51):132-41. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.77215.
3
Application of the kurtosis statistic to the evaluation of the risk of hearing loss in workers exposed to high-level complex noise.峭度统计量在评估高水平复合噪声暴露工人听力损失风险中的应用。
Ear Hear. 2010 Aug;31(4):527-32. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d94e68.
4
Auditory and vestibular dysfunction associated with blast-related traumatic brain injury.与爆炸相关的创伤性脑损伤相关的听觉和前庭功能障碍。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(6):797-810. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2008.09.0118.
5
Estimates of auditory risk from outdoor impulse noise. II: Civilian firearms.户外脉冲噪声导致的听觉风险评估。II:民用枪支。
Noise Health. 2009 Oct-Dec;11(45):231-42. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.56217.
6
Estimates of the auditory risk from outdoor impulse noise. I: Firecrackers.室外脉冲噪声所致听觉风险的评估。I:鞭炮
Noise Health. 2009 Oct-Dec;11(45):223-30. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.56216.
7
Attenuation of high-level impulses by earmuffs.耳罩对高强度脉冲的衰减作用。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Oct;122(4):2082-96. doi: 10.1121/1.2756973.
8
Assessment of noise exposure for indoor and outdoor firing ranges.室内和室外射击场噪声暴露评估。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2007 Sep;4(9):688-97. doi: 10.1080/15459620701537390.
9
Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimation of the field attenuation of hearing protection devices: sample size necessary to provide acceptable reproducibility.制定一种用于评估听力保护装置现场衰减的新的标准实验室方案:提供可接受再现性所需的样本量。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2004 Jan;115(1):311-23. doi: 10.1121/1.1633559.
10
Impulse noise and risk criteria.脉冲噪声与风险标准。
Noise Health. 2003 Jul-Sep;5(20):63-73.