• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

室外脉冲噪声所致听觉风险的评估。I:鞭炮

Estimates of the auditory risk from outdoor impulse noise. I: Firecrackers.

作者信息

Flamme Gregory A, Liebe Kevin, Wong Adam

机构信息

Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008, USA.

出版信息

Noise Health. 2009 Oct-Dec;11(45):223-30. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.56216.

DOI:10.4103/1463-1741.56216
PMID:19805932
Abstract

Firecrackers are common impulse noise exposures in the United States. In this study, impulses produced outdoors by consumer firecrackers were recorded, described, and analyzed with respect to the amount of the auditory risk they pose to the unprotected listener under various listening conditions. Risk estimates were obtained using three contemporary damage risk criteria (DRC), including a waveform parameter-based approach (peak SPL and B duration), an energy-based criterion (A-weighted sound exposure level and equivalent continuous level), and a physiological model (the AHAAH model developed by Price and Kalb). Results from these DRC were converted into numbers of maximum permissible unprotected exposures to facilitate comparison. Acoustic characteristics of firecracker impulses varied with the distance, but only subtle differences were observed across firecrackers. Typical peak levels ranged between 171 dB SPL at 0.5 m and 142 dB SPL at 8 m. Estimates of the auditory risk did not differ significantly across firecrackers, but varied with the distance. Vast differences in maximum permissible exposures were observed, and the directions of the differences varied with the level of the impulse. Typical estimates of maximum permissible exposures ranged between 0 and 2 at 0.5 m and between 31 and 227,000 at 8 m. Unprotected exposures to firecracker impulses should be limited or avoided entirely if the firecrackers are ignited in batches within 8 m of the listener. Differences across DRC are inconsequential at 0.5 m, but have substantial implications at distances of 1 m and more.

摘要

在美国,鞭炮是常见的脉冲噪声源。在本研究中,对消费型鞭炮在户外产生的脉冲进行了记录、描述,并分析了它们在各种聆听条件下对未受保护的聆听者所造成的听觉风险量。使用三种当代损害风险标准(DRC)来获得风险估计值,包括基于波形参数的方法(峰值声压级和B持续时间)、基于能量的标准(A加权声暴露级和等效连续级)以及一种生理模型(由普赖斯和卡尔布开发的AHAAH模型)。这些DRC的结果被转换为最大允许的未受保护暴露次数,以便于比较。鞭炮脉冲的声学特性随距离而变化,但不同鞭炮之间仅观察到细微差异。典型的峰值水平在0.5米处为171分贝声压级,在8米处为142分贝声压级之间。不同鞭炮的听觉风险估计没有显著差异,但随距离而变化。观察到最大允许暴露次数存在巨大差异,且差异方向随脉冲水平而变化。典型的最大允许暴露估计值在0.5米处为0至2次,在8米处为31至227000次之间。如果在距离聆听者8米以内成批点燃鞭炮,应限制或完全避免未受保护地暴露于鞭炮脉冲之下。在0.5米处,不同DRC之间的差异无关紧要,但在1米及更远的距离上具有重大影响。

相似文献

1
Estimates of the auditory risk from outdoor impulse noise. I: Firecrackers.室外脉冲噪声所致听觉风险的评估。I:鞭炮
Noise Health. 2009 Oct-Dec;11(45):223-30. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.56216.
2
Estimates of auditory risk from outdoor impulse noise. II: Civilian firearms.户外脉冲噪声导致的听觉风险评估。II:民用枪支。
Noise Health. 2009 Oct-Dec;11(45):231-42. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.56217.
3
Attenuation of high-level impulses by earmuffs.耳罩对高强度脉冲的衰减作用。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Oct;122(4):2082-96. doi: 10.1121/1.2756973.
4
Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise.接触枪击噪音后听力的暂时变化。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2004;17(2):285-93.
5
Toy weapons and firecrackers: a source of hearing loss.
Laryngoscope. 1989 Mar;99(3):330-4. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198903000-00018.
6
Risk of noise-induced hearing loss following exposure to Chinese firecrackers.
Audiology. 1993 Nov-Dec;32(6):333-43. doi: 10.3109/00206099309071864.
7
[Impulsive noise: PTS and anatomic correlations].[脉冲噪声:永久性阈移与解剖学关联]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 1995 Apr;15(2):61-4.
8
Auditory risk to unprotected bystanders exposed to firearm noise.暴露于枪支噪音中的未受保护旁观者的听觉风险。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Feb;22(2):93-103. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.2.4.
9
Duration and peak level as co-factors in hearing loss from exposure to impact noise.暴露于冲击噪声导致听力损失中,持续时间和峰值水平作为共同因素。
Scand Audiol Suppl. 1998;48:27-36.
10
[Adjustment of dose-response relationship of industrial impulse noise induced high frequency hearing loss with different exchange rate].[不同折算率下工业脉冲噪声所致高频听力损失剂量-反应关系的调整]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Jan 3;86(1):48-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Cochlear Damage Caused by the Striking Noise of Titanium Head Golf Driver.钛头高尔夫球杆击球噪音导致的耳蜗损伤
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Feb;12(1):18-26. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2017.01669. Epub 2018 May 3.
2
Prevention of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss from Recreational Firearms.预防娱乐性枪支导致的噪声性听力损失。
Semin Hear. 2017 Nov;38(4):267-281. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606323. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
3
Auditory risk of air rifles.气步枪的听觉风险。
Int J Audiol. 2016;55 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S51-8. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1131851.
4
Temporary threshold shift after impulse-noise during video game play: laboratory data.玩视频游戏期间受脉冲噪声影响后的暂时阈移:实验室数据。
Int J Audiol. 2014 Mar;53 Suppl 2(0 2):S53-65. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.865844.
5
Auditory risk estimates for youth target shooting.青少年射击的听觉风险评估。
Int J Audiol. 2014 Mar;53 Suppl 2(0 2):S16-25. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.865845.
6
Impulse noise generated by starter pistols.发令枪产生的脉冲噪声。
Int J Audiol. 2013 Feb;52 Suppl 1(0 1):S9-19. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.745650.
7
Measurement of impulse peak insertion loss for four hearing protection devices in field conditions.现场条件下四种听力保护器的脉冲峰值插入损失测量。
Int J Audiol. 2012 Feb;51 Suppl 1(0 1):S31-42. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.630330. Epub 2011 Dec 19.