• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

户外脉冲噪声导致的听觉风险评估。II:民用枪支。

Estimates of auditory risk from outdoor impulse noise. II: Civilian firearms.

作者信息

Flamme Gregory A, Wong Adam, Liebe Kevin, Lynd James

机构信息

Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008, USA.

出版信息

Noise Health. 2009 Oct-Dec;11(45):231-42. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.56217.

DOI:10.4103/1463-1741.56217
PMID:19805933
Abstract

Firearm impulses are common noise exposures in the United States. This study records, describes and analyzes impulses produced outdoors by civilian firearms with respect to the amount of auditory risk they pose to the unprotected listener under various listening conditions. Risk estimates were obtained using three contemporary damage risk criteria (DRC) including a waveform parameter-based approach (peak SPL and B-duration), an energy-based criterion (A-weighted SEL and equivalent continuous level) and a physiological model (AHAAH). Results from these DRC were converted into a number of maximum permissible unprotected exposures to facilitate interpretation. Acoustic characteristics of firearm impulses differed substantially across guns, ammunition, and microphone location. The type of gun, ammunition and the microphone location all significantly affected estimates of auditory risk from firearms. Vast differences in maximum permissible exposures were observed; the rank order of the differences varied with the source of the impulse. Unprotected exposure to firearm noise is not recommended, but people electing to fire a gun without hearing protection should be advised to minimize auditory risk through careful selection of ammunition and shooting environment. Small-caliber guns with long barrels and guns loaded with the least powerful ammunition tend to be associated with the least auditory risk.

摘要

在美国,枪支脉冲是常见的噪声暴露源。本研究记录、描述并分析了民用枪支在户外产生的脉冲,以及在各种聆听条件下这些脉冲对未受保护的聆听者所造成的听觉风险程度。使用三种当代损伤风险标准(DRC)来获取风险估计值,包括基于波形参数的方法(峰值声压级和B持续时间)、基于能量的标准(A加权等效连续声级和等效连续水平)以及一种生理模型(AHAAH)。这些DRC的结果被转换为一些最大允许的未受保护暴露次数,以便于解读。枪支脉冲的声学特性在不同的枪支、弹药和麦克风位置之间存在显著差异。枪支类型、弹药以及麦克风位置均对枪支产生的听觉风险估计有显著影响。观察到最大允许暴露次数存在巨大差异;差异的排序随脉冲源的不同而变化。不建议在无保护的情况下暴露于枪支噪声中,但对于那些选择在无听力保护措施下开枪的人,应建议他们通过仔细选择弹药和射击环境来将听觉风险降至最低。枪管较长的小口径枪支以及装填威力最小弹药的枪支往往与最低的听觉风险相关。

相似文献

1
Estimates of auditory risk from outdoor impulse noise. II: Civilian firearms.户外脉冲噪声导致的听觉风险评估。II:民用枪支。
Noise Health. 2009 Oct-Dec;11(45):231-42. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.56217.
2
Estimates of the auditory risk from outdoor impulse noise. I: Firecrackers.室外脉冲噪声所致听觉风险的评估。I:鞭炮
Noise Health. 2009 Oct-Dec;11(45):223-30. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.56216.
3
Temporary changes in hearing after exposure to shooting noise.接触枪击噪音后听力的暂时变化。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2004;17(2):285-93.
4
Auditory risk to unprotected bystanders exposed to firearm noise.暴露于枪支噪音中的未受保护旁观者的听觉风险。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Feb;22(2):93-103. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.2.4.
5
Auditory risk estimates for youth target shooting.青少年射击的听觉风险评估。
Int J Audiol. 2014 Mar;53 Suppl 2(0 2):S16-25. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.865845.
6
Auditory risk of air rifles.气步枪的听觉风险。
Int J Audiol. 2016;55 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S51-8. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1131851.
7
The reduction of gunshot noise and auditory risk through the use of firearm suppressors and low-velocity ammunition.通过使用枪支消音器和低速弹药来降低枪声噪音和听觉风险。
Int J Audiol. 2018 Feb;57(sup1):S28-S41. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1407459. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
8
Attenuation of high-level impulses by earmuffs.耳罩对高强度脉冲的衰减作用。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Oct;122(4):2082-96. doi: 10.1121/1.2756973.
9
Auditory risk of exposure to ballistic N-waves from bullets.子弹产生的弹道 N 波的听觉风险。
Int J Audiol. 2019 Feb;58(sup1):S58-S64. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1534009.
10
Validation of the auditory hazard assessment algorithm for the human with impulse noise data.基于脉冲噪声数据的人体听觉危害评估算法验证
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Nov;122(5):2786-802. doi: 10.1121/1.2785810.

引用本文的文献

1
Generalizability of clinically measured acoustic reflexes to brief sounds.临床测量的声反射对短暂声音的可推广性。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Nov;146(5):3993. doi: 10.1121/1.5132705.
2
The Noise Exposure Structured Interview (NESI): An Instrument for the Comprehensive Estimation of Lifetime Noise Exposure.噪声暴露结构化访谈(NESI):一种用于全面估计终生噪声暴露的工具。
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518803213. doi: 10.1177/2331216518803213.
3
Cochlear Damage Caused by the Striking Noise of Titanium Head Golf Driver.钛头高尔夫球杆击球噪音导致的耳蜗损伤
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Feb;12(1):18-26. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2017.01669. Epub 2018 May 3.
4
Prevention of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss from Recreational Firearms.预防娱乐性枪支导致的噪声性听力损失。
Semin Hear. 2017 Nov;38(4):267-281. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606323. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
5
Epidemiology of firearm and other noise exposures in the United States.美国枪支及其他噪音暴露的流行病学研究。
Laryngoscope. 2017 Oct;127(10):E340-E346. doi: 10.1002/lary.26540. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
6
Auditory risk of air rifles.气步枪的听觉风险。
Int J Audiol. 2016;55 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S51-8. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1131851.
7
Shooting history and presence of high-frequency hearing impairment in swedish hunters: A cross-sectional internet-based observational study.瑞典猎人的射击史及高频听力损伤情况:一项基于网络的横断面观察性研究。
Noise Health. 2015 Sep-Oct;17(78):273-81. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.165043.
8
Assessment of impulse noise level and acoustic trauma in military personnel.军事人员脉冲噪声水平及听觉损伤评估
Trauma Mon. 2012 Jan;16(4):182-7. doi: 10.5812/kowsar.22517464.2674. Epub 2012 Jan 15.
9
Temporary threshold shift after impulse-noise during video game play: laboratory data.玩视频游戏期间受脉冲噪声影响后的暂时阈移:实验室数据。
Int J Audiol. 2014 Mar;53 Suppl 2(0 2):S53-65. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.865844.
10
Auditory risk estimates for youth target shooting.青少年射击的听觉风险评估。
Int J Audiol. 2014 Mar;53 Suppl 2(0 2):S16-25. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.865845.