• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准腹腔镜与单孔腹腔镜结直肠切除术治疗癌症的前瞻性随机对照研究。

Standard laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: early results of a randomized prospective study.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Division of Surgery, Veneziale Hospital, Molise University, Isernia, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2012 Jul;204(1):115-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.09.005
PMID:22178484
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Standard laparoscopic colectomy (SLC) for cancer is a safe, feasible, and oncologically effective procedure with better short-term and similar long-term results of open colectomy. Conversely, owing to technical difficulties in colonic resection and full mesenteric dissection, single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) has been considered unsuitable for oncologic purposes. We compared the technical feasibility and early clinical outcomes of SLC and SILC for cancer.

METHODS

In this prospective randomized clinical trial, 16 (50%) patients underwent SLC (10 left and 6 right) and 16 (50%) patients underwent SILC (8 left and 8 right).

RESULTS

Demographics, preoperative data, and characteristics of the tumor were similar. The mean number of resected lymph nodes was 16 ± 5 in the SLC and 18 ± 6 in the SILC group (P = NS). Surgical time was 124 ± 8 minutes and 147 ± 5 minutes, respectively (P = NS). Surgical mortality was nil and the major morbidity rate was 6.3% in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SILC for cancer is a technically feasible and safe oncologic procedure with short-term results similar to those obtained with a traditional laparoscopic approach.

摘要

背景

标准腹腔镜结直肠切除术(SLC)治疗癌症是一种安全、可行且具有肿瘤学疗效的方法,其短期结果优于开腹结直肠切除术,而长期结果与之相似。然而,由于结肠切除和全肠系膜解剖的技术困难,单切口腹腔镜结直肠切除术(SILC)被认为不适合肿瘤学目的。我们比较了 SILC 和 SLC 治疗癌症的技术可行性和早期临床结果。

方法

在这项前瞻性随机临床试验中,16 例(50%)患者接受了 SLC(10 例左半结肠切除术和 6 例右半结肠切除术),16 例(50%)患者接受了 SILC(8 例左半结肠切除术和 8 例右半结肠切除术)。

结果

两组患者的人口统计学、术前数据和肿瘤特征相似。SLC 组和 SILC 组平均切除的淋巴结数分别为 16 ± 5 个和 18 ± 6 个(P = NS)。手术时间分别为 124 ± 8 分钟和 147 ± 5 分钟(P = NS)。两组均无手术死亡,主要并发症发生率为 6.3%。

结论

SILC 治疗癌症是一种技术可行且安全的肿瘤学方法,其短期结果与传统腹腔镜方法相似。

相似文献

1
Standard laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: early results of a randomized prospective study.标准腹腔镜与单孔腹腔镜结直肠切除术治疗癌症的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Am J Surg. 2012 Jul;204(1):115-20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
2
Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: assessment of oncologic resection and short-term outcomes in a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopy.单孔腹腔镜结直肠切除术治疗癌症:与标准腹腔镜相比的病例匹配对照评估肿瘤切除和短期结果。
Surgery. 2011 Oct;150(4):820-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.07.060.
3
Clinical outcome of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with transvaginal resection, anastomosis, and retrieval of specimen.经阴道切除、吻合和取出标本的腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的临床结果。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Nov;53(11):1473-9. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f1cc17.
4
Single-incision versus standard multiport laparoscopic colectomy: a multicenter, case-controlled comparison.单切口与标准多孔腹腔镜结肠切除术:一项多中心、病例对照比较研究。
Ann Surg. 2012 Jan;255(1):66-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182378442.
5
Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes after single-incision laparoscopic versus multiport laparoscopic right colectomy: a two-center, prospective case-controlled study of 100 patients.单孔腹腔镜与多孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术短期手术结局比较:100 例患者的前瞻性、两中心病例对照研究。
Dig Surg. 2012;29(6):477-83. doi: 10.1159/000346044. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
6
Laparoscopic medial-to-lateral approach for the curative resection of right-sided colon cancer.腹腔镜由内侧向外侧入路治疗右侧结肠癌根治术
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Jun;14(6):1878-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9153-2. Epub 2007 Mar 22.
7
The Radical Extent of lymphadenectomy - D2 dissection versus complete mesocolic excision of LAparoscopic Right Colectomy for right-sided colon cancer (RELARC) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.淋巴结清扫的根治范围——D2 清扫术与腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的全结肠系膜切除术治疗右侧结肠癌(RELARC)试验:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Dec 8;17(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1710-9.
8
Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: the first 100 resections.单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术:前 100 例切除。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Feb;55(2):134-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823c0ae4.
9
Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: experience with 17 consecutive cases and comparison with multiport laparoscopic right colectomy.单切口腹腔镜右半结肠切除术:17 例连续病例的经验及与多孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的比较。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Nov;53(11):1549-54. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181e85875.
10
Oncologic results of laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy for male sigmoid and upper rectal cancer with clinically positive lymph nodes.腹腔镜D3淋巴结清扫术治疗男性乙状结肠和上段直肠癌合并临床阳性淋巴结的肿瘤学结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Jul;14(7):1980-90. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9368-x. Epub 2007 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the safety and efficacy of SILS and SILS+1 port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal resection: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of RCTs.评估单孔腹腔镜手术(SILS)及单孔+1孔腹腔镜手术用于结直肠切除的安全性和有效性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价、Meta分析及试验序贯分析
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 27;15:1605040. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1605040. eCollection 2025.
2
Single-incision Laparoscopic Colonic Surgery: A Systemic Review, Meta-analysis, and Future Prospect.单切口腹腔镜结肠手术:系统评价、荟萃分析及未来展望
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2024 Apr 25;8(2):48-60. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2023-078. eCollection 2024.
3
Perioperative outcomes for single-port robotic versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a comparative analysis in colorectal cancer surgery.
单孔机器人与单切口腹腔镜手术的围手术期结果:结直肠癌手术中的对比分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Mar;38(3):1568-1575. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10629-2. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
4
Short-term and long-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a propensity-matched cohort study with conventional laparoscopic surgery.单切口加单孔腹腔镜手术与传统腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的短期和长期疗效:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov 29;23(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-03058-x.
5
Single incision laparoscopy versus conventional multiport laparoscopy for colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单孔腹腔镜与传统多孔腹腔镜结直肠手术的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Nov;105(8):709-720. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0132. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
6
Short-term outcomes of single-incision robotic colectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer.单孔机器人结直肠切除术与传统多孔腹腔镜结直肠切除术治疗结肠癌的短期疗效比较。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2351-2359. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01666-z. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
7
Comparison of clinical efficacy of single-incision and traditional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score matched studies.单孔与传统腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效比较:一项随机对照试验和倾向评分匹配研究的Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Oct 13;12:997894. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.997894. eCollection 2022.
8
Oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer (CSILS): study protocol for a multicentre, prospective, open-label, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial.单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的肿瘤学结局比较(CSILS):一项多中心、前瞻性、开放标签、非劣效性、随机对照临床试验研究方案。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jul 7;22(1):743. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09821-9.
9
Effect of single-incision plus one port laparoscopic surgery assisted with enhanced recovery after surgery on colorectal cancer: study protocol for a single-arm trial.单切口加单孔腹腔镜手术辅助术后加速康复对结直肠癌的影响:一项单臂试验的研究方案
Transl Cancer Res. 2021 Dec;10(12):5443-5453. doi: 10.21037/tcr-21-1361.
10
Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program Combined With Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis.手术后加速康复计划联合单孔腹腔镜手术在结直肠癌手术中的比较效果:一项回顾性分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 12;11:768299. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.768299. eCollection 2021.