Suppr超能文献

普通大众对希夫皮肤试验的解读能力如何?

How well do the general public read Heaf skin tests?

作者信息

Selby C D, Allen M B, Leitch A G

机构信息

Royal Victoria Dispensary, Edinburgh, U.K.

出版信息

Respir Med. 1990 May;84(3):245-8. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(08)80043-1.

Abstract

The ability of 550 consecutive patients attending a tuberculosis clinic to grade their own Heaf skin test reaction, using an illustrated card designed for such self-reporting, was assessed. Individuals were asked to grade their own Heaf skin reaction and at the same attendance the reaction was formally graded by a respiratory health visitor. There was overall excellent agreement with only 58 (10.5%) disparate gradings. We conclude that self-reporting of Heaf skin tests using an illustrated card is simple, usually accurate and may preclude an otherwise unnecessary early reattendance. This study also validates an often used system of self-reporting.

摘要

我们评估了550名连续前往结核病诊所就诊的患者使用专门为此类自我报告设计的图文卡片对自身希夫皮肤试验反应进行分级的能力。我们要求患者对自己的希夫皮肤反应进行分级,并且在同一就诊时,由呼吸健康访视员对反应进行正式分级。总体上一致性极佳,只有58例(10.5%)分级不同。我们得出结论,使用图文卡片对希夫皮肤试验进行自我报告简单易行,通常准确无误,并且可以避免原本不必要的过早复诊。本研究还验证了一种常用的自我报告系统。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验