Suppr超能文献

电动骨髓活检操作比标准手动设备能在更短时间内获取更大的核心标本,且疼痛更少。

Powered bone marrow biopsy procedures produce larger core specimens, with less pain, in less time than with standard manual devices.

作者信息

Miller Larry J, Philbeck Thomas E, Montez Diana F, Puga Tatiana A, Brodie Kim E, Cohen Stephen C, Spadaccini Cathy, Swords Ronan, Brenner Andrew J

机构信息

Vidacare Corporation, Shavano Park, TX;

出版信息

Hematol Rep. 2011 Jan 13;3(1):e8. doi: 10.4081/hr.2011.e8. Epub 2011 Jun 18.

Abstract

Bone marrow sampling remains essential in the evaluation of hematopoietic and many non-hematopoietic disorders. One common limitation to these procedures is the discomfort experienced by patients. To address whether a Powered biopsy system could reduce discomfort while providing equivalent or better results, we performed a randomized trial in adult volunteers. Twenty-six subjects underwent bilateral biopsies with each device. Core samples were obtained in 66.7% of Manual insertions; 100% of Powered insertions (P=0.002). Initial mean biopsy core lengths were 11.1±4.5 mm for the Manual device; 17.0±6.8 mm for the Powered device (P<0.005). Pathology assessment for the Manual device showed a mean length of 6.1±5.6 mm, width of 1.0±0.7 mm, and volume of 11.0±10.8 mm(3). Powered device measurements were mean length of 15.3±6.1 mm, width of 2.0±0.3 mm, and volume of 49.1±21.5 mm(3) (P<0.001). The mean time to core ejection was 86 seconds for Manual device; 47 seconds for the Powered device (P<0.001). The mean second look overall pain score was 33.3 for the Manual device; 20.9 for the Powered (P=0.039). We conclude that the Powered biopsy device produces superior sized specimens, with less overall pain, in less time.

摘要

骨髓采样在评估造血系统疾病和许多非造血系统疾病方面仍然至关重要。这些操作的一个常见局限性是患者会感到不适。为了探讨电动活检系统在减轻不适的同时能否提供同等或更好的结果,我们在成年志愿者中进行了一项随机试验。26名受试者使用每种设备进行双侧活检。手动穿刺获取核心样本的成功率为66.7%;电动穿刺的成功率为100%(P = 0.002)。手动设备的初始平均活检核心长度为11.1±4.5毫米;电动设备为17.0±6.8毫米(P < 0.005)。手动设备的病理评估显示平均长度为6.1±5.6毫米,宽度为1.0±0.7毫米,体积为11.0±10.8立方毫米。电动设备的测量结果为平均长度15.3±6.1毫米,宽度2.0±0.3毫米,体积49.1±21.5立方毫米(P < 0.001)。手动设备核心样本弹出的平均时间为86秒;电动设备为47秒(P < 0.001)。手动设备二次观察时的总体疼痛平均评分为33.3;电动设备为20.9(P = 0.039)。我们得出结论,电动活检设备能在更短时间内获取尺寸更大的样本,且总体疼痛更少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ece/3238476/bb9ea22be50e/hr-2011-1-e8-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验