Department of Ophthalmology, Corneal and External Disease Service, Santa Casa of São Paulo, Brazil.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(12):2013-8. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322011001200003.
To identify Chlamydia trachomatis via polymerase chain reaction and a direct fluorescent antibody assay in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis while comparing the efficacies of both tests for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in these conditions.
Conjunctival scraping samples were obtained from 177 patients who were divided into two groups: a vernal keratoconjunctivitis group (group A) and a control group (group B). The polymerase chain reaction and a direct fluorescent antibody assay were performed. Sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic curves, and areas under the curve were calculated for both tests in groups A and B. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted using a categorical variable with only two possible outcomes (positive and negative).
Statistical analysis revealed a significant association between vernal keratoconjunctivitis and Chlamydia trachomatis infection detected by a direct fluorescent antibody assay with high sensitivity and specificity. All patients in group A with positive polymerase chain reactions also presented with positive direct fluorescent antibody assays.
The association between vernal keratoconjunctivitis and Chlamydia trachomatis infection was confirmed by positive direct fluorescent antibody assays in 49.4% of vernal keratoconjunctivitis patients and by positive polymerase chain reactions in 20% of these patients. The direct fluorescent antibody assay detected Chlamydia trachomatis in a higher number of patients than did the polymerase chain reaction. Although the diagnosis of trachoma is essentially clinical, the disease may not be detected in vernal keratoconjunctivitis patients. Due to the high frequency of chlamydial infection detected in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis, we suggest considering routine laboratory tests to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in patients with severe and refractory allergic disease.
通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)和直接荧光抗体检测法(DFA)在春季角结膜炎患者中检测沙眼衣原体,并比较两种方法在这些情况下检测沙眼衣原体的效果。
从 177 例患者中采集结膜刮片样本,将其分为两组:春季角结膜炎组(A 组)和对照组(B 组)。进行聚合酶链反应和直接荧光抗体检测。计算两组中两种检测方法的敏感性、特异性、受试者工作特征曲线和曲线下面积。使用只有两种可能结果(阳性和阴性)的分类变量绘制受试者工作特征曲线。
统计分析显示,春季角结膜炎与 DFA 检测沙眼衣原体感染之间存在显著相关性,具有较高的敏感性和特异性。A 组中所有聚合酶链反应阳性的患者均呈现直接荧光抗体检测阳性。
49.4%的春季角结膜炎患者通过直接荧光抗体检测法和 20%的患者通过聚合酶链反应检测法呈沙眼衣原体感染阳性,证实了春季角结膜炎与沙眼衣原体感染之间的相关性。直接荧光抗体检测法检测到的沙眼衣原体感染患者多于聚合酶链反应。尽管沙眼的诊断主要基于临床,但可能会漏诊春季角结膜炎患者。由于春季角结膜炎患者中检测到沙眼衣原体感染的频率较高,我们建议在严重和难治性过敏性疾病患者中考虑常规实验室检测来检测沙眼衣原体。