Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(6):424-32. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e31823346fc.
To compare in-person versus telehealth (TH) assessment of discourse ability in adults with chronic traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Repeated-measures design with random order of conditions.
Twenty adults with moderate-to-severe TBI.
Participants completed conversation, picture description, story-generation, and procedural description tasks. Sessions were video-recorded and transcribed.
Measures of productivity and quality of discourse.
Significant differences between conditions were not detected in this sample, and feedback from participants was positive.
These preliminary results support the use of TH for the assessment of discourse ability in adults with TBI, at least for individuals with sufficient cognitive skills to follow TH procedures.
比较面对面评估与远程医疗（TH）评估对慢性创伤性脑损伤（TBI）成人话语能力的差异。
具有随机条件顺序的重复测量设计。
20 名中重度 TBI 成人。
参与者完成对话、图片描述、故事生成和程序描述任务。会话被录像并转录。
话语的产量和质量的测量。
在本样本中未发现条件之间存在显著差异，且参与者的反馈是积极的。
这些初步结果支持在 TBI 成人中使用 TH 进行话语能力评估，至少对于那些有足够认知技能来遵循 TH 程序的个体是如此。
