Suppr超能文献

半月板缝合:“桑蚕”和水平环技术的生物力学研究。

Meniscal sutures: biomechanical study of "mulberry" and horizontal loop techniques.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Nuova Clinica San Francesco, Foggia, Italy.

出版信息

J Orthop Traumatol. 2012 Mar;13(1):13-9. doi: 10.1007/s10195-011-0162-y. Epub 2011 Dec 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This in vitro biomechanical study tested the pullout strength of meniscal repair in human menisci using two different biodegradable suture techniques: the "mulberry" and the horizontal loop.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-five human menisci were used, to which a longitudinal tear of 1.5 cm was applied. If the thread broke or the knot was pulled inside the suture, as happened with the mulberry technique, the repair was considered a failure. Furthermore, we evaluated possible lesions of the meniscus due to changes the structural properties caused by the suture, leading to the loss of elastic return.

RESULTS

The results showed there was a statistically significant difference between the two suture techniques used and the unsutured menisci. Furthermore, five menisci with vertical sutures were analyzed for which the breakup loads were superior to the breakup loads of the mulberry suture and the horizontal loop suture. Nevertheless, the load strengths with respect to elastic return were similar to those of the mulberry and the horizontal loop techniques. Finally, in five menisci, we analyzed the suture-healthy meniscus interface, and found breakup values similar to those of the unsutured meniscus.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show the need to perform meniscal sutures and the futility of sutures that are intended to withstand elevated loads such as traction strengths of >30 N, as these produce irreparable secondary lesions that alter the histological structure of the meniscus and prevent healing.

摘要

背景

本体外生物力学研究测试了两种不同可生物降解缝线技术(“桑蚕结”和水平环)在人半月板修复中的半月板拔出强度。

材料和方法

使用 55 个人半月板,在半月板上施加 1.5cm 的纵向撕裂。如果缝线断裂或结在缝线内被拉出(如“桑蚕结”技术中发生的那样),则认为修复失败。此外,我们评估了由于缝线改变结构特性导致的半月板可能出现的损伤,从而导致弹性回复丧失。

结果

结果表明,两种缝线技术与未缝合的半月板之间存在统计学上的显著差异。此外,分析了 5 个带有垂直缝线的半月板,其断裂负荷优于“桑蚕结”和水平环缝线的断裂负荷。然而,关于弹性回复的负荷强度与“桑蚕结”和水平环技术相似。最后,在 5 个半月板中,我们分析了缝线-健康半月板界面,发现断裂值与未缝合的半月板相似。

结论

我们的结果表明需要进行半月板缝合,并且需要避免使用旨在承受高负荷的缝线,例如超过 30N 的牵拉力,因为这些缝线会产生不可修复的继发性损伤,改变半月板的组织学结构,并阻止愈合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da47/4417834/fde2c8e86aa0/10195_2011_162_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验