开始即结束。
The end at the beginning.
作者信息
White Michael
机构信息
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA.
出版信息
Ochsner J. 2011 Winter;11(4):309-16.
Abstract
The clinical management of infants born with disabilities and at the cusp of viability has been a focus of attention in recent years because of medical advances as well as legislative activity. This article looks at the history, in terms of law and medical tradition, of this issue as well as how healthcare providers have been and could be affected.
摘要
近年来，由于医学进步和立法活动，对患有残疾且处于可存活边缘的婴儿的临床管理一直是关注焦点。本文从法律和医学传统的角度审视了这个问题的历史，以及医疗服务提供者过去和未来可能受到的影响。
相似文献
1
The end at the beginning.开始即结束。
Ochsner J. 2011 Winter;11(4):309-16.
2
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演？美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》：关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
3
Rejecting the Baby Doe rules and defending a "negative" analysis of the Best Interests Standard.拒绝《婴儿多伊规则》并为对“最佳利益标准”的“否定性”分析进行辩护。
J Med Philos. 2005 Aug;30(4):331-52. doi: 10.1080/03605310591008487.
4
The antiabortion movement and Baby Jane Doe.反堕胎运动与无名女婴简
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):255-69. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-255.
5
The legal landscape at the threshold of viability for extremely premature infants: a nursing perspective, part I.
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2005 Apr-Jun;19(2):155-66; quiz 167-8. doi: 10.1097/00005237-200504000-00012.
6
The case of Baby Jane Doe. 2. Baby Jane Doe in the courts.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1984 Feb;14(1):13-9.
7
Neonatologists judge the "Baby Doe" regulations.新生儿科医生评判《“宝贝多伊”法规》。
N Engl J Med. 1988 Mar 17;318(11):677-83. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198803173181105.
8
The ballad of Baby Doe: parental discretion or medical neglect?
Prim Care. 1986 Jun;13(2):271-83.
9
Civil rights and regulatory wrongs: the Reagan administration and the medical treatment of handicapped infants.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Summer;11(2):231-54. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11-2-231.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
引用本文的文献
1
Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Surgery.小儿外科中的伦理考量
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2024 Mar-Apr;29(2):93-97. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_223_23. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
2
Legal Discrepancies and Expectations of Women: Abortion, Fetal Therapy, and NICU Care.法律差异与女性的期望：堕胎、胎儿治疗和新生儿重症监护。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2023 Mar;53(2):36-43. doi: 10.1002/hast.1472.
3
The first nationwide study on facing and solving ethical dilemmas among healthcare professionals in Slovenia.斯洛文尼亚首项关于医疗保健专业人员面临及解决伦理困境的全国性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 14;15(7):e0235509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235509. eCollection 2020.
4
Recent publications by ochsner authors.奥克斯纳作者近期发表的作品。
Ochsner J. 2012 Summer;12(2):175-80.
本文引用的文献
1
Noninitiation or withdrawal of intensive care for high-risk newborns.高危新生儿重症监护的不启动或撤离
Pediatrics. 2007 Feb;119(2):401-3. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3180.
2
Baby Doe rules.
Pediatrics. 2005 Dec;116(6):1600-1; discussion 1601-3. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-2002.
3
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演？美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》：关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
4
Extreme prematurity and parental rights after Baby Doe.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2004 Jul-Aug;34(4):32-9.
5
Discrimination against the handicapped by withholding treatment or nourishment; notice to health care providers.
Fed Regist. 1982 Jun 16;47(116):26027.
6
Nondiscrimination on the basis of handicap--Office of the Secretary, HHS. Interim final rule.
Fed Regist. 1983 Mar 7;48(45):9630-2.
7
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Bioethics: Guidelines on foregoing life-sustaining medical treatment.
Pediatrics. 1994 Mar;93(3):532-6.
8
The initiation or withdrawal of treatment for high-risk newborns. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn.
Pediatrics. 1995 Aug;96(2 Pt 1):362-3.
9
The case of Baby Jane Doe: child abuse or unlawful Federal intervention?无名女婴简的案例：虐待儿童还是联邦政府的非法干预？
Am J Public Health. 1984 Jul;74(7):727-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.74.7.727.
10
American Academy of Pediatrics Infant Bioethics Task Force and Consultants: Guidelines for infant bioethics committees.
Pediatrics. 1984 Aug;74(2):306-10.
Zotero 插件