• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

苏格兰扁桃体切除术后医嘱的可读性和内容:一个已完成的审核周期。

Readability and content of postoperative tonsillectomy instructions given to patients in Scotland, a completed audit cycle.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Glasgow G3 8SJ, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

Scott Med J. 2012 Feb;57(1):4-7. doi: 10.1258/smj.2011.011184. Epub 2011 Dec 22.

DOI:10.1258/smj.2011.011184
PMID:22194401
Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the recommendations and interventions of the 2003 audit of 'readability and content of postoperative tonsillectomy instructions, given to patients in Scotland'. A two-cycle audit of readability and content of postoperative tonsillectomy instructions was undertaken. All National Health Service (NHS) hospital wards and associated Otolaryngology Departments in Scotland where tonsillectomies were being performed were contacted. Interventions following the first cycle included the mailing copies of original audit results and conclusions to all ear, nose and throat wards in Scotland, presentation at a National Meeting and publication of results in a peer reviewed journal. While changes had occurred in 61% of the information sheets, and with six of the 31 (19%) postoperative information sheets now being written at or below the recommended reading level, the average reading grade/age required to understand these information sheets still remains above those recommended by patient education experts. In conclusion, the majority of postoperative tonsillectomy information sheets in Scotland remain written at a level above those recommended by patient education experts. The interventions undertaken in this audit were of limited success. The ENT-UK Tonsillectomy Information sheets (2006) are written at reasonable reading levels, have good content levels and we continue to recommend these information sheets.

摘要

本研究旨在评估苏格兰“术后扁桃体切除术医嘱的可读性和内容”审核(2003 年)的建议和干预措施的影响。我们进行了两轮术后扁桃体切除术医嘱的可读性和内容审核。联系了苏格兰所有提供扁桃体切除术的国民保健服务(NHS)医院病房和相关耳鼻喉科部门。第一轮审核结束后,我们将原始审核结果和结论的副本邮寄给了苏格兰所有耳鼻喉科病房,在全国会议上进行了演讲,并在同行评审的期刊上发表了结果。虽然 61%的信息表中的信息发生了变化,且 31 份信息表中的 6 份(19%)的书写水平达到或低于推荐的阅读水平,但理解这些信息表所需的平均阅读年级/年龄仍然高于患者教育专家推荐的水平。总之,苏格兰大多数术后扁桃体切除术信息表的书写水平仍高于患者教育专家推荐的水平。本审核中采取的干预措施收效有限。英国耳鼻喉科协会的扁桃体切除术信息表(2006 年)的书写水平合理,内容水平良好,我们继续推荐这些信息表。

相似文献

1
Readability and content of postoperative tonsillectomy instructions given to patients in Scotland, a completed audit cycle.苏格兰扁桃体切除术后医嘱的可读性和内容:一个已完成的审核周期。
Scott Med J. 2012 Feb;57(1):4-7. doi: 10.1258/smj.2011.011184. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
2
Readability and content of postoperative tonsillectomy instructions given to patients in Scotland.
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004 Apr;29(2):149-52. doi: 10.1111/j.0307-7772.2004.00757.x.
3
The Scottish tonsillectomy audit. Audit Sub-Committee of the Scottish Otolaryngological Society.苏格兰扁桃体切除术审计。苏格兰耳鼻喉科学会审计小组委员会。
J Laryngol Otol. 1996 Aug;110 Suppl 20:1-25.
4
The Scottish tonsillectomy audit. The Audit Sub-Committee of the Scottish Otolaryngological Society.苏格兰扁桃体切除术审计。苏格兰耳鼻喉科学会审计小组委员会。
J Laryngol Otol Suppl. 1996;20:1-25.
5
Readability of information leaflets given to attenders at hospital with a head injury.给因头部受伤而到医院就诊的患者发放的信息传单的可读性。
Emerg Med J. 2010 Apr;27(4):279-82. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.075424.
6
Readability of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry patient education materials.美国儿科学会牙科患者教育材料的可读性。
Pediatr Dent. 2007 Sep-Oct;29(5):431-5.
7
Readability of out-patient letters copied to patients: can patients understand what is written about them?复印给患者的门诊信件的可读性:患者能理解关于他们的内容吗?
J Laryngol Otol. 2010 Mar;124(3):324-7. doi: 10.1017/S0022215109991770. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
8
Research briefs reading grade level and readability of printed cancer education materials.研究简报:癌症印刷教育材料的阅读年级水平与可读性
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003 Sep-Oct;30(5):867-70. doi: 10.1188/03.ONF.867-870.
9
The impact of medical terminology on readability of patient education materials.医学术语对患者教育材料可读性的影响。
J Community Health Nurs. 2007 Summer;24(2):119-29. doi: 10.1080/07370010701316254.
10
Level of reading difficulty in the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists patient education pamphlets.美国妇产科医师学会患者教育手册的阅读难度水平
Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Dec;74(6):955-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Resource development in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery: an analysis on patient education resource development.耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学中的资源开发:患者教育资源开发分析
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Jul 16;43(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40463-014-0027-5. eCollection 2014.