• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国妇产科医师学会患者教育手册的阅读难度水平

Level of reading difficulty in the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists patient education pamphlets.

作者信息

Zion A B, Aiman J

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Dec;74(6):955-60.

PMID:2586962
Abstract

Written educational and informational materials are an important and potentially useful means to complement verbal instructions, assure that consent for tests and procedures is informed, and enhance compliance with treatment. In specialties other than obstetrics and gynecology, many of these materials have been found to be written at a level of difficulty above the reading ability of the intended audience. The SMOG formula was used to assess the level of reading difficulty of all 74 English-language patient education pamphlets developed by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee on Patient Education. Sixty-one of these pamphlets are written at a reading difficulty level of 11th grade or higher. Although the mean reading education level in the United States is at grade 12.6, the mean literacy level is at or below eighth grade. With the exception of one ACOG pamphlet written specifically for low-readability audiences (p-063, Birth Control Pills), all the pamphlets are written at a level higher than the literacy level of many women. The information is unlikely to be understood if it is written above the reading ability of the intended audience. This disparity is accentuated for health-education materials because scientific and technical terms further reduce the level of comprehension. The SMOG formula is a simple means to ensure that educational materials are written at a level appropriate for the intended audience.

摘要

书面教育和信息材料是补充口头指导、确保对检查和程序的同意是知情的以及提高治疗依从性的重要且可能有用的手段。在妇产科以外的专业领域,人们发现许多此类材料的编写难度高于目标受众的阅读能力。烟雾公式(SMOG公式)被用于评估美国妇产科医师学会(ACOG)患者教育委员会编写的所有74份英文患者教育手册的阅读难度水平。其中61份手册的阅读难度水平为11年级或更高。尽管美国的平均阅读教育水平为12.6年级,但平均识字水平在八年级及以下。除了ACOG专门为低阅读能力受众编写的一份手册(p - 063,避孕药)外,所有手册的编写水平都高于许多女性的识字水平。如果信息的编写高于目标受众的阅读能力,就不太可能被理解。对于健康教育材料来说,这种差异更加明显,因为科学和技术术语进一步降低了理解水平。烟雾公式是确保教育材料以适合目标受众的水平编写的一种简单方法。

相似文献

1
Level of reading difficulty in the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists patient education pamphlets.美国妇产科医师学会患者教育手册的阅读难度水平
Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Dec;74(6):955-60.
2
Parent comprehension of polio vaccine information pamphlets.家长对脊髓灰质炎疫苗信息手册的理解。
Pediatrics. 1996 Jun;97(6 Pt 1):804-10.
3
Readability levels of selected hypercholesterolemia patient education literature.所选高胆固醇血症患者教育文献的可读性水平。
Heart Lung. 1993 Sep-Oct;22(5):415-20.
4
Literacy in patients with a chronic disease: systemic lupus erythematosus and the reading level of patient education materials.慢性病患者的读写能力:系统性红斑狼疮与患者教育材料的阅读水平
J Rheumatol. 1997 Dec;24(12):2335-9.
5
Readability of American Cancer Society patient education literature.美国癌症协会患者教育文献的可读性。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1992 Jan-Feb;19(1):51-5.
6
Readability of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry patient education materials.美国儿科学会牙科患者教育材料的可读性。
Pediatr Dent. 2007 Sep-Oct;29(5):431-5.
7
American Academy of Family Physicians patient education materials: can patients read them?美国家庭医师学会患者教育资料:患者能读懂吗?
Fam Med. 2004 Sep;36(8):571-4.
8
Evaluation of the readability of ACOG patient education pamphlets. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.美国妇产科医师学会患者教育手册可读性评估。美国妇产科医师学会。
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 May;93(5 Pt 1):771-4. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00518-3.
9
Research briefs reading grade level and readability of printed cancer education materials.研究简报:癌症印刷教育材料的阅读年级水平与可读性
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003 Sep-Oct;30(5):867-70. doi: 10.1188/03.ONF.867-870.
10
Patient literacy and the readability of written cancer educational materials.患者的读写能力与癌症书面教育材料的可读性
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1995 Oct;22(9):1345-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Literacy and Associated Outcomes in the Postpartum Period at Grady Memorial Hospital.格迪纪念医院产后时期的健康素养及相关结局。
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Apr;25(4):599-605. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-03030-1. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
2
Assessing the readability and patient comprehension of rheumatology medicine information sheets: a cross-sectional Health Literacy Study.评估风湿病医学信息单的可读性和患者理解度:一项横断面健康素养研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 5;9(2):e024582. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024582.
3
Development and Formative Assessment of the Hearing Loss Toolkit for Self-Management.
听力损失自我管理工具包的开发与形成性评估
Semin Hear. 2019 Feb;40(1):49-67. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1676783. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
4
Exploring clinicians' attitudes about using aspirin for risk reduction in people with Lynch Syndrome with no personal diagnosis of colorectal cancer.探究临床医生对于在未个人诊断为结直肠癌的林奇综合征患者中使用阿司匹林进行风险降低的态度。
Fam Cancer. 2017 Jan;16(1):99-109. doi: 10.1007/s10689-016-9933-1.
5
The impact of an educational pamphlet on knowledge and anxiety in women with preeclampsia.一本教育手册对先兆子痫女性知识水平及焦虑情绪的影响。
Obstet Med. 2008 Sep;1(1):11-7. doi: 10.1258/om.2008.070001. Epub 2008 Sep 1.
6
Relationship between health literacy, health status, and healthy behaviors among older adults in Isfahan, Iran.伊朗伊斯法罕老年人的健康素养、健康状况与健康行为之间的关系。
J Educ Health Promot. 2012;1:31. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.100160. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
7
Written information about individual medicines for consumers.面向消费者的关于个别药品的书面信息。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD002104. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002104.pub3.
8
Impact of the informed consent process on patients' understanding of varicose veins and their treatment.知情同意过程对患者对静脉曲张及其治疗的理解的影响。
Ir J Med Sci. 2005 Jul-Sep;174(3):23-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03169143.
9
Materials and strategies that work in low literacy health communication.适用于低文化水平健康沟通的材料和策略。
Public Health Rep. 1994 Jan-Feb;109(1):86-92.