Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287-7613, USA.
CNS Drugs. 2012 Feb 1;26(2):123-34. doi: 10.2165/11597770-000000000-00000.
In the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), HIV-1-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) continues to be a common and significant morbidity among individuals infected with HIV. The term HAND encompasses a spectrum of progressively severe CNS involvement, ranging from asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment and minor neurocognitive disorder through to the most severe form of HIV-associated dementia (HAD). While the incidence of HAD has declined significantly with HAART, the milder forms of HAND persist. In addition, HAND now develops in individuals with less advanced immunosuppression. The reasons for the persistence of milder forms of HAND in individuals treated with HAART are not entirely known. There are several hypotheses to explain this phenomenon that include the legacy effect, a failure of antiretroviral agents to reverse neurological damage, poor access of antiretroviral agents to the CNS, chronic systemic immune activation associated with microbial translocation products, sustained CNS inflammation, the improved survival of HIV-seropositive individuals and the possible contribution from aging, amyloid deposition and other co-morbidities. In contrast, the incidence of HIV-associated CNS opportunistic processes including progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, tuberculosis, CNS toxoplasmosis, cytomegalovirus encephalitis, cryptococcosis and primary CNS lymphoma has declined dramatically with the introduction of HAART. This review briefly summarizes our current understanding of HAND and the pathological mechanisms involved, namely direct injury from HIV-1 and viral proteins, indirect neurotoxicity from proinflammatory cytokines and chronic, sustained immune activation in the CNS. To date, only HAART has been shown to benefit HAND despite numerous controlled trials of adjunctive 'anti-inflammatory' agents. Although HAART has a profound impact on the incidence and severity of HAND, there exists a 'therapeutic gap' as even HAART that is effective at inducing durable virological suppression may only partially reverse HAND. In addition, there may be potential CNS adverse effects of antiretroviral agents. There is an ongoing multicentre clinical trial to investigate the role of the CNS Penetration-Effectiveness index, an indicator of drug permeability and availability in the CNS, to help guide the choice of antiretroviral agents in the treatment of HAND. With recent recommendations for earlier treatment intervention with HAART for HIV-1 infection, it remains to be seen the effects of this on HAND. There is an urgent need to better define the therapeutic guidelines for the prevention and treatment of HAND.
在高效抗逆转录病毒治疗(HAART)时代,HIV-1 相关神经认知障碍(HAND)仍然是 HIV 感染者中常见且严重的发病率。HAND 一词涵盖了从无症状神经认知障碍和轻度神经认知障碍到最严重形式的 HIV 相关痴呆(HAD)的逐渐严重的中枢神经系统受累范围。虽然随着 HAART 的应用,HAD 的发病率显著下降,但 HAND 的轻度形式仍然存在。此外,HAND 现在也发生在免疫抑制程度较低的个体中。HAART 治疗个体中轻度 HAND 持续存在的原因尚不完全清楚。有几种假设可以解释这种现象,包括遗留效应、抗病毒药物未能逆转神经损伤、抗病毒药物无法进入中枢神经系统、与微生物易位产物相关的慢性全身免疫激活、持续的中枢神经系统炎症、HIV 阳性个体的生存改善以及可能与衰老、淀粉样蛋白沉积和其他合并症有关。相比之下,HIV 相关中枢神经系统机会性疾病的发病率,包括进行性多灶性白质脑病、结核、中枢神经系统弓形体病、巨细胞病毒脑炎、隐球菌病和原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤,随着 HAART 的引入已经显著下降。本文简要总结了我们目前对手 HAND 及其相关病理机制的理解,即 HIV-1 和病毒蛋白的直接损伤、促炎细胞因子的间接神经毒性以及中枢神经系统的慢性、持续免疫激活。迄今为止,尽管有许多辅助“抗炎”药物的对照试验,但只有 HAART 被证明对 HAND 有益。尽管 HAART 对 HAND 的发病率和严重程度有深远影响,但仍存在“治疗差距”,因为即使是能有效诱导持久病毒学抑制的 HAART,也只能部分逆转 HAND。此外,抗病毒药物可能存在潜在的中枢神经系统不良反应。目前正在进行一项多中心临床试验,以研究中枢神经系统渗透效率指数(CNS Penetration-Effectiveness index)的作用,该指数是衡量药物在中枢神经系统中的渗透性和可用性的指标,以帮助指导 HAND 治疗中抗病毒药物的选择。随着 HIV-1 感染早期治疗干预 HAART 的最新建议,尚不清楚这对 HAND 的影响。迫切需要更好地定义 HAND 的预防和治疗治疗指南。