Cognitive Science Department, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Oct;38(5):1289-314. doi: 10.1037/a0026585. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
Current debate in mental imagery research revolves around the perceptual and cognitive role of eye movements to "nothing" (Ferreira, Apel, & Henderson, 2008; Richardson, Altmann, Spivey, & Hoover, 2009). While it is established that eye movements are comparable when inspecting a scene (or hearing a scene description) as when visualizing it from memory (Johansson, Holsanova, & Holmqvist, 2006), the exact purpose of these eye movements remains elusive. Are eye movements during recall purely epiphenomenal or do they have a functional purpose? Here we address this question in four experiments where eye movements were prohibited either during the encoding or recall phases. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that maintaining central fixation during visual or auditory encoding, respectively, had no effect on how eye movements were executed during recall (but it did hinder memory retrieval). Thus, oculomotor events during recall are not reinstatements of those produced during encoding. When fixation was restricted during recall, Experiments 3 and 4 revealed that scene recollection was altered and impaired, irrespective of the modality of encoding. The functional role of eye movements during mental visualization is therefore apparent in this perturbation of visuospatial capabilities.
当前,在心理意象研究领域,争论的焦点集中在眼动在“无物”(即想象)中的知觉和认知作用上(Ferreira、Apel 和 Henderson,2008;Richardson、Altmann、Spivey 和 Hoover,2009)。虽然已经证实,当人们观察一个场景(或听到对场景的描述)时,他们的眼动与回忆该场景时的眼动是相似的(Johansson、Holsanova 和 Holmqvist,2006),但这些眼动的确切目的仍然难以捉摸。在回忆过程中,眼动是纯粹的副现象还是具有功能目的?在这里,我们在四个实验中探讨了这个问题,在这些实验中,眼动要么在编码阶段,要么在回忆阶段被禁止。实验 1 和实验 2 表明,在视觉或听觉编码期间保持中央注视,对回忆期间眼动的执行方式没有影响(但确实会阻碍记忆检索)。因此,回忆期间的眼动事件并不是对编码期间产生的眼动事件的再现。当在回忆期间限制注视时,实验 3 和实验 4 表明,无论编码的模态如何,场景回忆都会发生改变和受损。因此,在这种对视空间能力的干扰中,眼动在心理可视化过程中的功能作用是显而易见的。