Suppr超能文献

管理养老院居民和社区居住的老年人中的高血压:一项比较药物流行病学研究。

Managing hypertension among nursing-home residents and community-dwelling elderly in Germany: a comparative pharmacoepidemiological study.

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Faculty, Technical University of Dresden, Fiedlerstrasse 27, D - 01307 Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012 May;68(5):867-75. doi: 10.1007/s00228-011-1195-0. Epub 2011 Dec 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the adequacy of hypertension management in hypertensive elderly living in long-term-care facilities compared with home-living elderly.

METHODS

This retrospective, cross-sectional, pharmacoepidemiological study compared data from a community-dwelling population (CD) and from four nursing homes (NH) in Dresden, Germany. Individuals aged ≥ 65 with the diagnosis of arterial hypertension were included. Demographical, medical, and drug prescription data as well as blood pressure (BP) values were analyzed and compared descriptively after matching the populations by age and gender.

RESULTS

Each population comprised 209 patients (mean age 80.4 years [± 6], 70.3% women). NH showed a higher number of diseases [7 (5-9) vs. 5 (3-7); p < 0.001]. BP (<140/90 mmHg) was better controlled in NH (61.0% vs. 48.1%; p = 0.015). The median number of BP-lowering drugs was three (2-4; CD) and two (1-3; NH) (range: 0-9). Most frequently used antihypertensives were diuretics and beta-blockers. Among renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers, angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) were preferred in CD and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in NH. Drug treatment for secondary prevention of myocardial infarction or stroke [acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 100, RAS-blocker, beta-blocker, statin] was low among both groups (CD 21.3%; NH 1.6%; p = 0.01). NH received more inappropriate drugs, especially tranquillizers (31.2% vs. 21.0%; p < 0.05) [according to the PRISCUS (Latin for "old and venerable") list for potentially inappropriate medications in the elderly (PIM)].

CONCLUSIONS

NH residents showed better BP control than CD elderly while receiving less antihypertensive drugs. The prescription of antihypertensives was assumed to be more cost effective in NH. Nevertheless, inappropriate drug use is still high (NH > CD), and there is an extended need for professional medication assessment in both groups of elderly.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查与居家生活的老年人相比,长期护理机构中高血压老年患者的高血压管理是否充分。

方法

本回顾性、横断面、药物流行病学研究比较了德国德累斯顿的一个社区居住人群(CD)和四个养老院(NH)的数据。纳入年龄≥65 岁且诊断为动脉高血压的个体。对人口统计学、医学和药物处方数据以及血压(BP)值进行了分析,并在按年龄和性别匹配人群后进行了描述性比较。

结果

每个人群均包括 209 名患者(平均年龄 80.4 岁[±6],70.3%为女性)。NH 显示出更多的疾病[7(5-9)vs. 5(3-7);p<0.001]。NH 的 BP(<140/90 mmHg)控制更好[61.0% vs. 48.1%;p=0.015]。降压药物的中位数数量为 3 种(2-4;CD)和 2 种(1-3;NH)(范围:0-9)。最常使用的降压药是利尿剂和β受体阻滞剂。在肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)阻滞剂中,CD 中更倾向于使用血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB),而 NH 中更倾向于使用血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂。两组的二级预防心肌梗死或中风的药物治疗[乙酰水杨酸(ASA)100、RAS 阻滞剂、β受体阻滞剂、他汀类]均较低(CD 21.3%;NH 1.6%;p=0.01)。NH 接受了更多不合适的药物,尤其是镇静剂(31.2% vs. 21.0%;p<0.05)[根据老年人潜在不适当药物(PIM)的 PRISCUS(拉丁语为“年老而受尊敬的”)列表]。

结论

NH 居民的 BP 控制优于 CD 老年人,而使用的降压药物较少。NH 中降压药物的处方可能更具成本效益。然而,不适当的药物使用仍然很高(NH>CD),两组老年人仍需要进行专业的药物评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验