Departments of Health Studies and Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 May;53(5):536-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02509.x. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
A better understanding of the nature and etiology of conduct disorder (CD) can inform nosology and vice versa. We posit that any prevalent form of psychopathology, including CD, can be best understood if it is studied in the context of other correlated forms of child and adolescent psychopathology using formal models to guide inquiry.
Review of both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies of the place of CD in the phenotypic and causal structure of prevalent psychopathology, with an emphasis on similarities and differences between CD and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). Papers were located using Web of Science by topic searches with no restriction on year of publication.
Although some important nosologic questions remain unanswered, the dimensional phenotype of CD is well defined. CD differs from other disorders in its correlates, associated impairment, and course. Nonetheless, it is robustly correlated with many other prevalent dimensions of psychopathology both concurrently and predictively, including both other 'externalizing' disorders and some 'internalizing' disorders. Based on emerging evidence, we hypothesize that these concurrent and predictive correlations result primarily from widespread genetic pleiotropy, with some genetic factors nonspecifically influencing risk for multiple correlated dimensions of psychopathology. In contrast, environmental influences mostly act to differentiate dimensions of psychopathology from one another both concurrently and over time. CD and ODD share half of their genetic influences, but their genetic etiologies are distinct in other ways. Unlike most other dimensions of psychopathology, half of the genetic influences on CD appear to be unique to CD. In contrast, ODD broadly shares nearly all of its genetic influences with other disorders and has little unique genetic variance.
Conduct disorder is a relatively distinct syndrome at both phenotypic and etiologic levels, but much is revealed by studying CD in the context of its causal and phenotypic associations with other disorders over time. Advancing and refining formal causal models that specify the common and unique causes and biological mechanisms underlying each correlated dimension of psychopathology should facilitate research on the fundamental nature and nosology of CD.
更好地了解品行障碍 (CD) 的性质和病因可以为分类学提供信息,反之亦然。我们假设,任何流行形式的精神病理学,包括 CD,如果在使用正式模型指导研究的情况下,在儿童和青少年精神病理学的其他相关形式的背景下进行研究,可以得到最好的理解。
对 CD 在流行精神病理学的表型和因果结构中的位置进行横断面和纵向研究的综述,重点关注 CD 与对立违抗性障碍 (ODD) 之间的异同。通过主题搜索在 Web of Science 中查找论文,没有对发表年份的限制。
尽管一些重要的分类学问题仍未得到解答,但 CD 的维度表型定义明确。CD 在其相关性、相关损害和病程方面与其他疾病不同。尽管如此,它与许多其他流行的精神病理学维度,包括其他“外显”障碍和一些“内隐”障碍,在同时和预测上都有很强的相关性。基于新出现的证据,我们假设这些同时和预测的相关性主要来自广泛的遗传多效性,一些遗传因素非特异性地影响多种相关精神病理学维度的风险。相比之下,环境影响主要在同时和随时间推移的维度上影响精神病理学的差异。CD 和 ODD 共享一半的遗传影响,但它们的遗传病因在其他方面是不同的。与大多数其他精神病理学维度不同,CD 遗传影响的一半似乎是 CD 特有的。相比之下,ODD 广泛地与其他疾病共享其遗传影响,并且遗传变异很小。
品行障碍在表型和病因学水平上都是一个相对独特的综合征,但通过研究 CD 在时间上与其他疾病的因果和表型关联,可以揭示更多信息。推进和完善正式的因果模型,明确每个相关精神病理学维度的共同和独特原因以及生物学机制,应有助于研究 CD 的基本性质和分类学。