Suppr超能文献

开展教育领域的学术项目:医学教师入门指南。

Developing scholarly projects in education: a primer for medical teachers.

作者信息

Beckman Thomas J, Cook David A

机构信息

Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2007 Mar;29(2-3):210-8. doi: 10.1080/01421590701291469.

Abstract

Boyer and Glassick's broad definition of and standards for assessing scholarship apply to all aspects of education. Research on the quality of published medical education studies also reveals fundamentally important elements to address. In this article a three-step approach to developing medical education projects is proposed: refine the scholarly question, identify appropriate designs and methods, and select outcomes. Refining the scholarly question requires careful attention to literature review, conceptual framework, and statements of problem and study intent. The authors emphasize statement of study intent, which is a study's focal point, and conceptual framework, which situates a project within a theoretical context and provides a means for interpreting the results. They then review study designs and methods commonly used in education projects. They conclude with outcomes, which should be distinguished from assessment methods and instruments, and are separated into Kirkpatrick's hierarchy of reaction, learning, behavior and results.

摘要

博耶(Boyer)和格拉斯克(Glassick)对学术成果评估的宽泛定义及标准适用于教育的各个方面。关于已发表医学教育研究质量的调查也揭示了一些需要解决的根本性重要因素。本文提出了一种开发医学教育项目的三步法:完善学术问题、确定合适的设计和方法以及选择结果。完善学术问题需要仔细关注文献综述、概念框架以及问题陈述和研究意图。作者强调研究意图的陈述,它是一项研究的重点,还有概念框架,它将一个项目置于理论背景中,并提供一种解释结果的方法。然后他们回顾了教育项目中常用的研究设计和方法。最后他们讨论了结果,结果应与评估方法和工具区分开来,并分为柯克帕特里克(Kirkpatrick)的反应、学习、行为和结果层次结构。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验