• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公立医院、专科治疗中心和私人提供者之间髋关节置换术住院时间的差异:是选择还是效率?

Differences in length of stay for hip replacement between public hospitals, specialised treatment centres and private providers: selection or efficiency?

机构信息

Department of Economics and Related Studies, and Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, UK.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2013 Feb;22(2):234-42. doi: 10.1002/hec.1826. Epub 2012 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1002/hec.1826
PMID:22223593
Abstract

We investigate differences in patients' length of stay between National Health Service (NHS) public hospitals, specialised public treatment centres and private treatment centres that provide elective (non-emergency) hip replacement to publicly funded patients. We find that the specialised public treatment centres and private treatment centres have, on average, respectively 18% and 40% shorter length of stay compared with NHS public hospitals, even after controlling for differences in age, gender, number and type of diagnoses, deprivation and regional variation. Therefore, we interpret such differences as because of efficiency as opposed to selection of less complex patients. Quantile regression suggests that the proportional differences between different provider types are larger at the higher conditional quantiles of length of stay.

摘要

我们研究了国民保健制度(NHS)公立医院、专门的公立治疗中心和为公费患者提供择期(非紧急)髋关节置换手术的私立治疗中心之间患者住院时间的差异。我们发现,即使在控制了年龄、性别、诊断数量和类型、贫困程度和区域差异等因素后,专门的公立治疗中心和私立治疗中心的平均住院时间分别比 NHS 公立医院短 18%和 40%。因此,我们认为这些差异是由于效率的原因,而不是选择了病情不太复杂的患者。分位数回归表明,在住院时间的较高条件分位数上,不同提供者类型之间的比例差异更大。

相似文献

1
Differences in length of stay for hip replacement between public hospitals, specialised treatment centres and private providers: selection or efficiency?公立医院、专科治疗中心和私人提供者之间髋关节置换术住院时间的差异:是选择还是效率?
Health Econ. 2013 Feb;22(2):234-42. doi: 10.1002/hec.1826. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
2
Do the poor cost much more? The relationship between small area income deprivation and length of stay for elective hip replacement in the English NHS from 2001 to 2008.贫困人口的医疗费用更高吗?2001 年至 2008 年英国国民保健服务体系中小面积收入剥夺与择期髋关节置换术住院时间的关系。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Jan;72(2):173-84. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.001. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
3
The effects of surgical volumes and training centre status on outcomes following total joint replacement: analysis of the Hospital Episode Statistics for England.手术量和培训中心状态对全关节置换术后结局的影响:基于英格兰医院事件统计数据的分析
J Public Health (Oxf). 2006 Jun;28(2):116-24. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdl003. Epub 2006 Apr 5.
4
Satisfaction with joint replacement in public versus private hospitals: a cohort study.公立与私立医院关节置换满意度:一项队列研究。
ANZ J Surg. 2012 Sep;82(9):616-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06113.x. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
5
Is it financially efficient to lose the ring-fenced elective orthopaedic ward?失去隔离的矫形外科特需病房是否具有财务效益?
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Apr;11(2):151-4. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0018-0.
6
An ecological study of NHS funded elective hip arthroplasties in England from 2003/04 to 2012/13.英格兰 2003/04 至 2012/13 年 NHS 资助的择期髋关节置换术的生态学研究。
J R Soc Med. 2019 Jul;112(7):292-303. doi: 10.1177/0141076819851701. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
7
Hospital stay amongst patients undergoing major elective colorectal surgery: predicting prolonged stay and readmissions in NHS hospitals.接受大型择期结直肠手术的患者的住院时间:预测 NHS 医院的住院时间延长和再入院率。
Colorectal Dis. 2011 Jul;13(7):816-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02277.x. Epub 2010 Apr 5.
8
Patient choice and private provision decreased public provision and increased inequalities in Scotland: a case study of elective hip arthroplasty.患者选择和私人供应减少了苏格兰的公共供应,增加了不平等:以择期髋关节置换术为例的研究。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2017 Sep 1;39(3):593-600. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdw060.
9
The effect of the public or private status of health care facility in acute coronary syndrome: data from Thai ACS Registry.医疗机构的公立或私立性质对急性冠状动脉综合征的影响:来自泰国急性冠状动脉综合征注册研究的数据
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Oct;90 Suppl 1:98-108.
10
Public versus private health care in a national health service.国家医疗服务体系中的公共医疗与私人医疗
Health Econ. 2007 Jun;16(6):579-601. doi: 10.1002/hec.1185.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) reform on cost homogeneity of treatment for patients with malignant tumours.诊断相关分组(DRG)改革对恶性肿瘤患者治疗费用同质性的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 11;14(1):21212. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71917-y.
2
Factors Associated with Prolonged Length of Stay in the Ambulatory Care Unit of a Tertiary Government Hospital.三级政府医院门诊护理单元住院时间延长的相关因素
Acta Med Philipp. 2024 Jul 31;58(13):45-49. doi: 10.47895/amp.v58i13.8086. eCollection 2024.
3
Patient outcomes, efficiency, and adverse events for elective hip and knee replacement in private and NHS hospitals: a population-based cohort study in England.
私立医院和国民保健服务(NHS)医院择期髋关节和膝关节置换手术的患者预后、效率及不良事件:一项基于英格兰人群的队列研究
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Apr 17;40:100904. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100904. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Mixed Methods EvAluation of the high-volume low-complexity Surgical hUb pRogrammE (MEASURE): a mixed methods study protocol.混合方法评价大容量低复杂度手术中心项目(MEASURE):一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 19;14(4):e086338. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086338.
5
A systematic review of the accessibility, acceptability, safety, efficiency, clinical effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of private cataract and orthopedic surgery clinics.私人白内障和矫形外科手术诊所的可及性、可接受性、安全性、效率、临床疗效和成本效益的系统评价。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Aug 1;39(1):e47. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000120.
6
Driving time drives the hospital choice: choice models for pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Italy.驾驶时间影响医院选择:意大利盆腔器官脱垂手术的选择模型。
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Dec;24(9):1575-1586. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01563-6. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
7
Cardiovascular Health Peaks and Meteorological Conditions: A Quantile Regression Approach.心血管健康峰值与气象条件:分位数回归方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 16;18(24):13277. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413277.
8
Outcomes for surgical procedures funded by the English health service but carried out in public versus independent hospitals: a database study.英国医疗服务体系资助的手术在公立医院和私立医院实施的结果:数据库研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Jul;31(7):515-525. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013522. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
9
Divided by choice? For-profit providers, patient choice and mechanisms of patient sorting in the English National Health Service.是否因选择而分化?盈利性医疗机构、患者选择权与英国国民医疗服务体系中的患者分类机制。
Health Econ. 2021 Apr;30(4):820-839. doi: 10.1002/hec.4223. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
10
Awareness of performance on outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty among Dutch orthopedic surgeons: how to improve feedback from arthroplasty registries.荷兰骨科医生对全髋关节和膝关节置换术后结果表现的认知:如何改善关节置换登记处的反馈。
Acta Orthop. 2021 Feb;92(1):54-61. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2020.1827523. Epub 2020 Oct 6.