Suppr超能文献

公立医院、专科治疗中心和私人提供者之间髋关节置换术住院时间的差异:是选择还是效率?

Differences in length of stay for hip replacement between public hospitals, specialised treatment centres and private providers: selection or efficiency?

机构信息

Department of Economics and Related Studies, and Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, UK.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2013 Feb;22(2):234-42. doi: 10.1002/hec.1826. Epub 2012 Jan 6.

Abstract

We investigate differences in patients' length of stay between National Health Service (NHS) public hospitals, specialised public treatment centres and private treatment centres that provide elective (non-emergency) hip replacement to publicly funded patients. We find that the specialised public treatment centres and private treatment centres have, on average, respectively 18% and 40% shorter length of stay compared with NHS public hospitals, even after controlling for differences in age, gender, number and type of diagnoses, deprivation and regional variation. Therefore, we interpret such differences as because of efficiency as opposed to selection of less complex patients. Quantile regression suggests that the proportional differences between different provider types are larger at the higher conditional quantiles of length of stay.

摘要

我们研究了国民保健制度(NHS)公立医院、专门的公立治疗中心和为公费患者提供择期(非紧急)髋关节置换手术的私立治疗中心之间患者住院时间的差异。我们发现,即使在控制了年龄、性别、诊断数量和类型、贫困程度和区域差异等因素后,专门的公立治疗中心和私立治疗中心的平均住院时间分别比 NHS 公立医院短 18%和 40%。因此,我们认为这些差异是由于效率的原因,而不是选择了病情不太复杂的患者。分位数回归表明,在住院时间的较高条件分位数上,不同提供者类型之间的比例差异更大。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验