• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体认知行为干预治疗初级保健中的下背痛:腰背技能训练试验的扩展随访(ISRCTN54717854)。

Group cognitive behavioural interventions for low back pain in primary care: extended follow-up of the Back Skills Training Trial (ISRCTN54717854).

机构信息

Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK Kadoorie Critical Care Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Pain. 2012 Feb;153(2):494-501. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.11.016. Epub 2012 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2011.11.016
PMID:22226729
Abstract

Group cognitive behavioural intervention (CBI) is effective in reducing low back pain and disability over a 12-month period, in comparison to best practice advice in primary care. The aim was to study the effects of this CBI beyond 12 months. We undertook an extended follow-up of our original randomised, controlled trial of a group CBI and best practice advice in primary care, in comparison to best practice advice alone. Participants were mailed a questionnaire including measures of disability, pain, health services resource use, and health-related quality of life. The time of extended follow-up ranged between 20 and 50 months (mean 34 months). Fifty-six percent (395 of 701) of the original cohort provided extended follow-up. Those who responded were older and had less disability and pain at baseline than did the original trial cohort. After 12 months, the improvements in pain and disability observed with CBI were sustained. For disability measures, the treatment difference in favour of CBI persisted (mean difference 1.3 Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire points, 95% confidence interval 0.27 to 2.26; 5.5 Modified von Korff Scale disability points, 95% confidence interval 0.27 to 10.64). There was no between-group difference in Modified von Korff Scale pain outcomes. The results suggest that the effects of a group CBI are maintained up to an average of 34 months. Although pain improves in response to best practice advice, longer-term recovery of disability remains substantially less.

摘要

团体认知行为干预(CBI)在 12 个月的时间内有效降低了腰痛和残疾的发生率,与初级保健中的最佳实践建议相比。目的是研究这种 CBI 在 12 个月以上的效果。我们对我们之前的一项团体 CBI 与初级保健中的最佳实践建议的随机对照试验进行了扩展随访,与单独的最佳实践建议相比。参与者通过邮件收到了一份包括残疾、疼痛、卫生服务资源使用和健康相关生活质量的问卷。扩展随访的时间范围在 20 到 50 个月之间(平均 34 个月)。原始队列中有 56%(395/701)的人提供了扩展随访。与原始试验队列相比,那些做出回应的人年龄更大,基线时的残疾和疼痛程度更低。在 12 个月后,CBI 观察到的疼痛和残疾改善持续存在。对于残疾测量,CBI 的治疗优势持续存在(平均差异 1.3 分 Roland 和 Morris 残疾问卷,95%置信区间 0.27 至 2.26;5.5 分改良 von Korff 量表残疾评分,95%置信区间 0.27 至 10.64)。改良 von Korff 量表疼痛结果没有组间差异。结果表明,团体 CBI 的效果可维持长达平均 34 个月。虽然疼痛会因最佳实践建议而改善,但残疾的长期恢复仍然大大减少。

相似文献

1
Group cognitive behavioural interventions for low back pain in primary care: extended follow-up of the Back Skills Training Trial (ISRCTN54717854).群体认知行为干预治疗初级保健中的下背痛:腰背技能训练试验的扩展随访(ISRCTN54717854)。
Pain. 2012 Feb;153(2):494-501. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.11.016. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
2
A multicentred randomised controlled trial of a primary care-based cognitive behavioural programme for low back pain. The Back Skills Training (BeST) trial.一项基于初级保健的认知行为方案治疗腰痛的多中心随机对照试验。背部技能训练(BeST)试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Aug;14(41):1-253, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta14410.
3
Treatment compliance and effectiveness of a cognitive behavioural intervention for low back pain: a complier average causal effect approach to the BeST data set.治疗依从性和认知行为干预治疗腰痛的效果:对 BeST 数据集的遵从平均因果效应方法。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Jan 14;15:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-17.
4
Group cognitive behavioural treatment for low-back pain in primary care: a randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.群体认知行为疗法治疗初级保健中的下腰痛:一项随机对照试验和成本效益分析。
Lancet. 2010 Mar 13;375(9718):916-23. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62164-4. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
5
Supporting self-management with an internet intervention for low back pain in primary care: a RCT (SupportBack 2).在初级保健中通过互联网干预支持腰痛自我管理:一项随机对照试验(SupportBack 2)。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Apr;29(7):1-90. doi: 10.3310/GDPS2418.
6
Yoga treatment for chronic non-specific low back pain.瑜伽治疗慢性非特异性下腰痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 12;1(1):CD010671. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010671.pub2.
7
Explaining How Cognitive Behavioral Approaches Work for Low Back Pain: Mediation Analysis of the Back Skills Training Trial.解释认知行为方法对腰痛的作用:腰背技能训练试验的中介分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Sep 1;42(17):E1031-E1039. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002066.
8
RESTORE-Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.有或无运动传感器生物反馈的恢复认知功能疗法与慢性致残性腰痛的常规护理对比:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 18;9(8):e031133. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031133.
9
Predicting response to a cognitive-behavioral approach to treating low back pain: Secondary analysis of the BeST data set.预测认知行为疗法治疗腰痛的反应:BeST 数据集的二次分析。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Sep;63(9):1271-9. doi: 10.1002/acr.20518.
10
A Mind-Body Program for Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.一项针对慢性下腰痛老年人的身心计划:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Mar;176(3):329-37. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.8033.

引用本文的文献

1
Enablers, Barriers and Practical Applications of a Group-Based Pain Self-Management Program for Patients Receiving Medical Cannabis: A Qualitative Study of Patients and Clinicians.医用大麻患者基于小组的疼痛自我管理计划的促进因素、障碍及实际应用:一项针对患者和临床医生的定性研究
Pain Pract. 2025 Jun;25(5):e70052. doi: 10.1111/papr.70052.
2
Clinical Examination, Diagnosis, and Conservative Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review.慢性下腰痛的临床检查、诊断及保守治疗:一项叙述性综述
Life (Basel). 2024 Aug 29;14(9):1090. doi: 10.3390/life14091090.
3
Do recommended interventions widen or narrow inequalities in musculoskeletal health? An equity-focussed systematic review of differential effectiveness.
推荐的干预措施是否会扩大或缩小肌肉骨骼健康方面的不平等?一项关注公平性的差异有效性系统评价。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Aug 25;44(3):e376-e387. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdac014.
4
What can we learn from long-term studies on chronic low back pain? A scoping review.从慢性下背痛的长期研究中我们能学到什么?范围综述。
Eur Spine J. 2022 Apr;31(4):901-916. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07111-3. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
5
Interventions for the Management of Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: Revision 2021.干预措施治疗急性和慢性下背痛:2021 年修订版。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Nov;51(11):CPG1-CPG60. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2021.0304.
6
The influence of cognitive behavioral therapy on lumbar spine surgery outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.认知行为疗法对腰椎手术结果的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2021 May;30(5):1365-1379. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06747-x. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
7
Evaluating the impact of a champion on implementation of the Back Skills Training (BeST) programme in Canada: a mixed methods feasibility study protocol.评估倡导者对加拿大背部技能培训(BeST)计划实施的影响:一项混合方法可行性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 30;10(11):e040834. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040834.
8
Can Acupuncture Improve Chronic Spinal Pain? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.针灸能改善慢性脊柱疼痛吗?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Global Spine J. 2021 Oct;11(8):1248-1265. doi: 10.1177/2192568220962440. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
9
Effects of hypnosis, cognitive therapy, hypnotic cognitive therapy, and pain education in adults with chronic pain: a randomized clinical trial.催眠、认知疗法、催眠认知疗法和疼痛教育对慢性疼痛成人的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Pain. 2020 Oct;161(10):2284-2298. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001943.
10
The Recent Trend in Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain.慢性下腰痛的诊断与治疗新趋势
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2017 Dec 20;1(1):1-6. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.1.2016-0022. eCollection 2017.