Suppr超能文献

比较针对猫乳球菌和链球菌属 16S rRNA 基因的海鸥粪便特异性检测方法

Comparison of gull feces-specific assays targeting the 16S rRNA genes of Catellicoccus marimammalium and Streptococcus spp.

机构信息

National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Mar;78(6):1909-16. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07192-11. Epub 2012 Jan 6.

Abstract

Two novel gull-specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays were developed using 16S rRNA gene sequences from gull fecal clone libraries: a SYBR green assay targeting Streptococcus spp. (gull3) and a hydrolysis TaqMan assay targeting Catellicoccus marimammalium (gull4). The objectives of this study were to compare the host specificity of a previous C. marimammalium qPCR assay (gull2) with that of the new markers and to examine the presence of the three gull markers in environmental water samples from different geographic locations. Most of the gull fecal samples tested (n = 255) generated positive signals with the gull2 and gull4 assays (i.e., >86%), whereas only 28% were positive with gull3. Low prevalence and abundance of tested gull markers (0.6 to 15%) were observed in fecal samples from six nonavian species (n = 180 fecal samples), whereas the assays cross-reacted to some extent (13 to 31%) with other (nongull) avian fecal samples. The gull3 assay was positive against fecal samples from 11 of 15 avian species, including gull. Of the presumed gull-impacted water samples (n = 349), 86%, 59%, and 91% were positive with the gull2, the gull3, and the gull4 assays, respectively. Approximately 5% of 239 non-gull-impacted water samples were positive with the gull2 and the gull4 assays, whereas 21% were positive witg the gull3 assay. While the relatively high occurrence of gull2 and gull4 markers in waters impacted by gull feces suggests that these assays could be used in environmental monitoring studies, the data also suggest that multiple avian-specific assays will be needed to accurately assess the contribution of different avian sources in recreational waters.

摘要

两种新型的基于鸥类粪便克隆文库 16S rRNA 基因序列的定量 PCR(qPCR)检测方法被开发出来:一种针对链球菌属(gull3)的 SYBR Green 检测方法和一种针对乳球菌属(Catellicoccus marimammalium)的水解 TaqMan 检测方法(gull4)。本研究的目的是比较先前的 C. marimammalium qPCR 检测方法(gull2)与新标记物的宿主特异性,并检测来自不同地理位置的环境水样中三种鸥类标记物的存在情况。在测试的大多数鸥类粪便样本(n = 255)中,gull2 和 gull4 检测方法都产生了阳性信号(即>86%),而只有 28%的样本与 gull3 检测方法产生了阳性信号。在来自 6 种非鸟类物种(n = 180 个粪便样本)的粪便样本中,检测到的测试鸥类标记物的低流行率和低丰度(0.6 至 15%),而这些检测方法在某种程度上(13 至 31%)与其他(非鸥类)鸟类粪便样本发生了交叉反应。gull3 检测方法对来自 15 种鸟类物种中的 11 种的粪便样本呈阳性,包括鸥类。在假定受鸥类粪便影响的水样(n = 349)中,gull2、gull3 和 gull4 检测方法的阳性率分别为 86%、59%和 91%。在 239 个非受鸥类粪便影响的水样中,约有 5%的水样与 gull2 和 gull4 检测方法呈阳性,而 21%的水样与 gull3 检测方法呈阳性。虽然受鸥类粪便影响的水中 gull2 和 gull4 标记物的高发生率表明这些检测方法可用于环境监测研究,但数据也表明,需要多种针对鸟类的特异性检测方法来准确评估不同鸟类来源在娱乐水中的贡献。

相似文献

5
Phylogenetic diversity and molecular detection of bacteria in gull feces.鸥粪便中细菌的系统发育多样性及分子检测
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jul;74(13):3969-76. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00019-08. Epub 2008 May 9.

引用本文的文献

10
Comparative Analysis of Intestine Microbiota of Four Wild Waterbird Species.四种野生水鸟肠道微生物群的比较分析
Front Microbiol. 2019 Aug 20;10:1911. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01911. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验