• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估DiaFocus系统用于2型糖尿病综合个性化管理的临床可行性:6个月的试点队列研究。

Assessing the Clinical Feasibility of the DiaFocus System for Integrated Personalized Management of Type 2 Diabetes: 6-Month Pilot Cohort Study.

作者信息

Lind Nanna, Bækgaard Per, Bardram Jakob E, Cramer-Petersen Claus, Nørgaard Kirsten, Christensen Merete B

机构信息

Copenhagen University Hospital - Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juuls vej 83, Herlev, 2730, Denmark, 45 28711435.

Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

JMIR Diabetes. 2025 Aug 25;10:e63894. doi: 10.2196/63894.

DOI:10.2196/63894
PMID:40854092
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12377514/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a complex, chronic condition that requires ongoing management. An important aspect of effective diabetes management is shared decision-making between the person with diabetes and the health care professionals (HCPs) to tailor individual treatment plans. Personal health technologies can play a crucial role in this collaborative effort by providing tools for monitoring, communication, and education.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to test the clinical feasibility of DiaFocus, a mobile health system developed for adults with T2D.

METHODS

This was a single-arm, prospective, 6-month pilot study in a clinical outpatient setting at Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Denmark. The DiaFocus system includes an app for the participants and a web portal for the HCPs. The system collects diabetes-related data, including participant-reported lifestyle surveys, sensor-based measures on physical activity, and participant-selected focus areas, aiming to support communication and shared decision-making at clinical visits. Participants were eligible if they were ≥18 years old, diagnosed with T2D≥12 months, spoke Danish, and had a smartphone (iOS 13+ or Android 8.0+). For each participant, 3 visits and 1 telephone call were scheduled during the 6-month study period. The DiaFocus system's acceptability and feasibility were assessed through retention rates, app usage, participant feedback, and by the CACHET Unified Method for Assessment of Clinical Feasibility (CUMACF) questionnaire. The clinical outcomes were assessed by the following questionnaires: Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS), Perceived Competence for Diabetes (PCDS), Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQs+c), hemoglobin A1c levels, and body weight.

RESULTS

A total of 17 participants with T2D were included in the study, 15 completed the study, and data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The median age was 68 (IQR 56-72) years, 12 (71%) were males, the median diabetes duration was 18 (IQR 11-21) years, and the median hemoglobin A1c was 59 (IQR 49-68) mmol/mol. Participants found the DiaFocus system feasible to support diabetes management despite technical problems, and they valued the ability to set focus areas. The most common focus areas were "blood glucose" (n=10, 59%) and "exercise" (n=9, 53%), but areas such as "sleep" and "mood" were also used. The CUMACF questionnaire showed that 90% (9/10) of the participants had very favorable views of how easy the system is to understand, learn, and use, and 80% (8/10) of the participants agreed or strongly agreed that the system was useful. Feedback was generally positive, indicating participants would use a refined version. Despite these findings, no statistically significant changes in clinical outcomes were observed throughout the study period using the DiaFocus system.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study demonstrated that the DiaFocus system is clinically feasible and acceptable for users with T2D, although there is a need for optimization of app functionality and stability.

摘要

背景

2型糖尿病(T2D)是一种复杂的慢性疾病,需要持续管理。有效糖尿病管理的一个重要方面是糖尿病患者与医护人员(HCPs)之间的共同决策,以制定个性化治疗方案。个人健康技术可以通过提供监测、沟通和教育工具,在这项协作努力中发挥关键作用。

目的

本研究旨在测试为成年T2D患者开发的移动健康系统DiaFocus的临床可行性。

方法

这是一项在丹麦哥本哈根斯滕诺糖尿病中心临床门诊进行的单臂、前瞻性、为期6个月的试点研究。DiaFocus系统包括一个供参与者使用的应用程序和一个供HCPs使用的门户网站。该系统收集与糖尿病相关的数据,包括参与者报告的生活方式调查、基于传感器的身体活动测量以及参与者选择的关注领域,旨在支持临床就诊时的沟通和共同决策。符合条件的参与者需年满18岁,确诊T2D≥12个月,会说丹麦语,且拥有智能手机(iOS 13+或安卓8.0+)。在为期6个月的研究期间,为每位参与者安排了3次就诊和1次电话随访。通过留存率、应用程序使用情况、参与者反馈以及CACHET临床可行性统一评估方法(CUMACF)问卷对DiaFocus系统的可接受性和可行性进行评估。通过以下问卷评估临床结果:糖尿病痛苦量表(DDS)、糖尿病自我效能感量表(PCDS)、糖尿病治疗满意度问卷(DTSQs+c)、糖化血红蛋白水平和体重。

结果

共有17名T2D参与者纳入研究,15名完成研究,数据按意向性分析原则进行分析。中位年龄为68(四分位间距56 - 72)岁,12名(71%)为男性,中位糖尿病病程为18(四分位间距11 - 21)年,中位糖化血红蛋白为59(四分位间距49 - 68)mmol/mol。尽管存在技术问题,参与者认为DiaFocus系统在支持糖尿病管理方面是可行的,并且他们重视设置关注领域的能力。最常见的关注领域是“血糖”(n = 10,59%)和“运动”(n = 9,53%),但“睡眠”和“情绪”等领域也被使用。CUMACF问卷显示,90%(9/10)的参与者对系统的易理解性、易学习性和易用性给予了非常积极的评价,80%(8/10)的参与者同意或强烈同意该系统有用。反馈总体上是积极的,表明参与者会使用优化后的版本。尽管有这些发现,但在整个研究期间,使用DiaFocus系统未观察到临床结果有统计学意义的变化。

结论

这项试点研究表明,DiaFocus系统对于T2D用户在临床方面是可行且可接受的,尽管需要优化应用程序功能和稳定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33de/12377514/77f763eb34b6/diabetes-v10-e63894-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33de/12377514/1c6fa4251632/diabetes-v10-e63894-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33de/12377514/cba54b990bbf/diabetes-v10-e63894-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33de/12377514/6fce1501bb1a/diabetes-v10-e63894-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33de/12377514/77f763eb34b6/diabetes-v10-e63894-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33de/12377514/1c6fa4251632/diabetes-v10-e63894-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33de/12377514/cba54b990bbf/diabetes-v10-e63894-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33de/12377514/6fce1501bb1a/diabetes-v10-e63894-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33de/12377514/77f763eb34b6/diabetes-v10-e63894-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the Clinical Feasibility of the DiaFocus System for Integrated Personalized Management of Type 2 Diabetes: 6-Month Pilot Cohort Study.评估DiaFocus系统用于2型糖尿病综合个性化管理的临床可行性:6个月的试点队列研究。
JMIR Diabetes. 2025 Aug 25;10:e63894. doi: 10.2196/63894.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
Computer and mobile technology interventions for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理的计算机和移动技术干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 23;5(5):CD011425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011425.pub2.
5
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
6
Glycaemic control in labour with diabetes: GILD, a scoping study.糖尿病产妇分娩期间的血糖控制:GILD,一项范围界定研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(41):1-150. doi: 10.3310/KHGD2761.
7
A digital intervention to improve mental health and interpersonal resilience for young people who have experienced online sexual abuse: the i-Minds non-randomised feasibility clinical trial and nested qualitative study.一项针对遭受网络性虐待的年轻人改善心理健康和人际恢复力的数字干预措施:i-Minds非随机可行性临床试验及嵌套定性研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(28):1-27. doi: 10.3310/THAL8732.
8
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
9
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.
10
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Emotional distress, self-management, and glycemic control among participants enrolled in the glycemia reduction approaches in diabetes: A comparative effectiveness (GRADE) study.参与糖尿病血糖降低方法的比较效果(GRADE)研究的参与者的情绪困扰、自我管理和血糖控制。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2023 Feb;196:110229. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.110229. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
2
5. Facilitating Behavior Change and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022.5. 促进行为改变和幸福感以改善健康结局:2022 年糖尿病医学护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(Suppl 1):S60-S82. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S005.
3
Sleep disorders in people with type 2 diabetes and associated health outcomes: a review of the literature.
2 型糖尿病患者的睡眠障碍及其相关健康结局:文献综述。
Diabetologia. 2021 Nov;64(11):2367-2377. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05541-0. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
4
Effectiveness of Disease-Specific mHealth Apps in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Scoping Review.疾病特异性移动医疗应用程序在糖尿病患者中的有效性:范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Feb 15;9(2):e23477. doi: 10.2196/23477.
5
Benefit of Digital Tools Used for Integrated Personalized Diabetes Management: Results From the PDM-ProValue Study Program.数字工具用于整合个性化糖尿病管理的获益:PDM-ProValue 研究项目的结果。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Mar;14(2):240-249. doi: 10.1177/1932296819867686. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
6
Digital health technology and mobile devices for the management of diabetes mellitus: state of the art.数字健康技术和移动设备在糖尿病管理中的应用:现状。
Diabetologia. 2019 Jun;62(6):877-887. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-4864-7. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
7
Integrated personalized diabetes management improves glycemic control in patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: Results of the PDM-ProValue study program.整合个性化糖尿病管理可改善胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制:PDM-ProValue 研究项目的结果。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Oct;144:200-212. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
8
Mobile App-Based Interventions to Support Diabetes Self-Management: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials to Identify Functions Associated with Glycemic Efficacy.基于移动应用程序的干预措施以支持糖尿病自我管理:对随机对照试验的系统评价,以确定与血糖疗效相关的功能
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Mar 14;5(3):e35. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6522.
9
Integrated Personalized Diabetes Management (PDM): Design of the ProValue Studies: Prospective, Cluster-Randomized, Controlled, Intervention Trials for Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Benefit of PDM in Patients With Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes.综合个性化糖尿病管理(PDM):ProValue研究的设计:用于评估PDM对胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者有效性和益处的前瞻性、整群随机、对照干预试验
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016 May 3;10(3):772-81. doi: 10.1177/1932296815617487. Print 2016 May.
10
The effects of high-intensity interval training on glucose regulation and insulin resistance: a meta-analysis.高强度间歇训练对血糖调节和胰岛素抵抗的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Obes Rev. 2015 Nov;16(11):942-61. doi: 10.1111/obr.12317.