Wagner Richard K, Puranik Cynthia S, Foorman Barbara, Foster Elizabeth, Wilson Laura Gehron, Tschinkel Erika, Kantor Patricia Thatcher
Florida State University and Florida Center for Reading Research, Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Read Writ. 2011 Feb 1;24(2):203-220. doi: 10.1007/s11145-010-9266-7.
Alternative models of the structure of individual and developmental differences of written composition and handwriting fluency were tested using confirmatory factor analysis of writing samples provided by first- and fourth-grade students. For both groups, a five-factor model provided the best fit to the data. Four of the factors represented aspects of written composition: macro-organization (use of top sentence and number and ordering of ideas), productivity (number and diversity of words used), complexity (mean length of T-unit and syntactic density), and spelling and punctuation. The fifth factor represented handwriting fluency. Handwriting fluency was correlated with written composition factors at both grades. The magnitude of developmental differences between first grade and fourth grade expressed as effect sizes varied for variables representing the five constructs: large effect sizes were found for productivity and handwriting fluency variables; moderate effect sizes were found for complexity and macro-organization variables; and minimal effect sizes were found for spelling and punctuation variables.
使用一、四年级学生提供的写作样本进行验证性因素分析,对书面作文和书写流畅性的个体结构及发展差异的替代模型进行了测试。对于两组学生而言,一个五因素模型与数据拟合度最佳。其中四个因素代表书面作文的各个方面:宏观组织(首句的使用、观点的数量和排序)、产出(使用的单词数量和多样性)、复杂性(T单位的平均长度和句法密度)以及拼写和标点。第五个因素代表书写流畅性。在两个年级中,书写流畅性均与书面作文因素相关。一年级和四年级之间以效应量表示的发展差异大小因代表这五个结构的变量而异:产出和书写流畅性变量的效应量较大;复杂性和宏观组织变量的效应量中等;拼写和标点变量的效应量最小。