• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估非药物干预措施对控制新发传染病的效果。

Assessing the effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions on containing an emerging disease.

机构信息

School of Automation, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China.

出版信息

Math Biosci Eng. 2012 Jan 1;9(1):147-64. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.147.

DOI:10.3934/mbe.2012.9.147
PMID:22229401
Abstract

Non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as quarantine, isolation and entry screening, are usually the primary public health measures to control the spread of an emerging infectious disease through a human population. This paper proposes a multi-regional deterministic compartmental model to assess the effectiveness and implications of non-pharmaceutical interventions. The reproduction number is determined as the spectral radius of a nonnegative matrix product. Comparisons are made using the reproduction number, epidemic peaks and cumulative number of infections and mortality as indexes. Simulation results show that quarantine of suspected cases and isolation of cases with symptom are effective in reducing disease burden for multiple regions. Using entry screening strategy leads to a moderate time delay for epidemic peaks, but is of no help for preventing an epidemic breaking out. The study further shows that isolation strategy is always the best choice in the presence or absence of stringent hygiene precautions and should be given priority in combating an emerging epidemic.

摘要

非药物干预措施,如检疫、隔离和入境筛查,通常是控制新发传染病在人群中传播的主要公共卫生措施。本文提出了一个多区域确定性房室模型来评估非药物干预措施的效果和影响。繁殖数是由非负矩阵乘积的谱半径确定的。使用繁殖数、流行高峰和累积感染人数和死亡率作为指标进行比较。模拟结果表明,对疑似病例的检疫和对有症状病例的隔离,对多个地区减轻疾病负担是有效的。采用入境筛查策略会导致流行高峰出现适度的时间延迟,但对防止疫情爆发没有帮助。研究进一步表明,在存在或不存在严格卫生措施的情况下,隔离策略始终是最佳选择,应优先用于应对新发传染病。

相似文献

1
Assessing the effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions on containing an emerging disease.评估非药物干预措施对控制新发传染病的效果。
Math Biosci Eng. 2012 Jan 1;9(1):147-64. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.147.
2
Variability order of the latent and the infectious periods in a deterministic SEIR epidemic model and evaluation of control effectiveness.确定性 SEIR 传染病模型中潜伏和传染期的变异性顺序及控制效果评估。
Math Biosci. 2010 Mar;224(1):43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2009.12.007. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
3
An integral equation model for the control of a smallpox outbreak.一个用于控制天花爆发的积分方程模型。
Math Biosci. 2005 May;195(1):1-22. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2005.01.006.
4
Epidemiological models with non-exponentially distributed disease stages and applications to disease control.具有非指数分布疾病阶段的流行病学模型及其在疾病控制中的应用。
Bull Math Biol. 2007 Jul;69(5):1511-36. doi: 10.1007/s11538-006-9174-9. Epub 2007 Jan 20.
5
Joint estimation of the basic reproduction number and generation time parameters for infectious disease outbreaks.传染病暴发基本再生数和世代时间参数的联合估计。
Biostatistics. 2011 Apr;12(2):303-12. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxq058. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
6
Estimating individual and household reproduction numbers in an emerging epidemic.估算新兴传染病中的个体和家庭繁殖数。
PLoS One. 2007 Aug 22;2(8):e758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000758.
7
Non-pharmaceutical interventions.非药物干预措施。
J Indian Med Assoc. 2009 Aug;107(8):540-2.
8
An SIS patch model with variable transmission coefficients.一个具有可变传输系数的 SIS 斑块模型。
Math Biosci. 2011 Aug;232(2):110-5. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 May 18.
9
Isolation versus quarantine and alternative measures to control emerging infectious diseases.隔离与检疫以及控制新发传染病的替代措施。
Saudi Med J. 2004 Oct;25(10):1337-46.
10
Multiple sources and routes of information transmission: Implications for epidemic dynamics.多种信息传播源和途径:对疫情动态的影响。
Math Biosci. 2011 Jun;231(2):197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2011.03.006. Epub 2011 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
One Pandemic, Two Solutions: Comparing the U.S.-China Response and Health Priorities to COVID-19 from the Perspective of "Two Types of Control".一场大流行,两种解决方案:从“两类管控”视角比较中美对新冠疫情的应对及卫生优先事项
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 26;11(13):1848. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131848.
2
Lessons from past pandemics: a systematic review of evidence-based, cost-effective interventions to suppress COVID-19.从过去的大流行病中吸取的教训:系统评价有证据支持、具有成本效益的干预措施以抑制 COVID-19。
Syst Rev. 2022 May 12;11(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01958-9.
3
Travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: an evidence map.
与旅行相关的控制措施以遏制 COVID-19 大流行:证据图谱。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 9;11(4):e041619. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041619.
4
The global dynamics for a stochastic SIS epidemic model with isolation.一个具有隔离措施的随机SIS传染病模型的全局动力学
Physica A. 2018 Feb 15;492:1604-1624. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.11.085. Epub 2017 Nov 21.