Jacobs I, Oram D, Fairbanks J, Turner J, Frost C, Grudzinskas J G
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, London Hospital, Whitechapel.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Oct;97(10):922-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02448.x.
Age, ultrasound score, menopausal status, a clinical impression score and serum CA 125 level were assessed to see how they could best distinguish between patients with benign (n = 101) and malignant (n = 42) pelvic masses. Each criteria used alone provided statistically significant discrimination. The most useful individual criteria were a serum CA 125 level of 30 U/ml (sensitivity 81%, specificity 75%) and an ultrasound score of 2 (sensitivity 71%, specificity 83%). Three criteria could be combined in a risk of malignancy index (RMI) which is simply calculated using the product of the serum CA 125 level (U/ml), the ultrasound scan result (expressed as a score of 0, 1 or 3) and the menopausal status (1 if premenopausal and 3 if postmenopausal). This index was statistically virtually as effective a discriminant between cancer and benign lesions as more formal methods. Using an RMI cut-off level of 200, the sensitivity was 85% and the specificity was 97%. Patients with an RMI score of greater than 200 had, on average, 42 times the background risk of cancer and those with a lower value 0.15 times the background risk.
对年龄、超声评分、绝经状态、临床印象评分和血清CA 125水平进行评估,以观察它们如何能最好地区分患有良性(n = 101)和恶性(n = 42)盆腔肿块的患者。单独使用的每个标准都提供了具有统计学意义的区分。最有用的个体标准是血清CA 125水平为30 U/ml(敏感性81%,特异性75%)和超声评分为2(敏感性71%,特异性83%)。三个标准可以组合成一个恶性风险指数(RMI),该指数只需将血清CA 125水平(U/ml)、超声扫描结果(表示为0、1或3分)和绝经状态(绝经前为1,绝经后为3)相乘即可计算得出。该指数在统计学上与更正式的方法一样,在区分癌症和良性病变方面几乎同样有效。使用RMI临界值200时,敏感性为85%,特异性为97%。RMI评分大于200的患者,其患癌背景风险平均为42倍,而评分较低的患者其患癌背景风险为0.15倍。